for me will always be T1 t2 t3 and t4 its way + simplefy But fix the right names to each tech .
TAG_Utter
The new build start give me a pleasure now playing.... Well done.
Actualy even something basic like it is i like [e digicons];P[/e]
strategic zoom just dont work. Im 100% for full zoom love it. But i dont now how some players like play a game like this ,only with icons ,you just need to wait and see will be bether options that will alow us enjoy the look. But i dont denied that we need something to understand what it what!!!
At the moment there is lot normal problems with orders that need be fix . So wont be fun play multiplayer for now thats wy you dont found players but wont take long to that happend.
Ok maybe you right maybe you dont . How can you now they not same ? But thats not a problem, important its not share the gameplay until we can. Pass this lets focus again on game :)
1-What do you like to see in a RTS game to make you buy it? 2-Whats your style? 3-What kind eco you want in a rts? 4-What units and lategame options you want in your RTS game ? 5-You only for online, play with friends? 6-You want DLC, expansions? 7-How long you think a game must have to be fun for you? 8-How mush you think DLC must cost? Put your feedback
http://waskul.tv/portfolio/chris-taylor-steve-waskul-2015/ I just post because i think its interesting this interview. What have capture my thoughts its something thats real true like CT says: Right now most important in games its the gameplay and make the player have fun with the game or not matter the quality in renders wont sale.
[e digicons]k1[/e] yes
Yes i like to see the shields and artilhary ,they are part of RTS games long time .
Rules are to respect or dont make part founders team. Plz dont share gameplay videos His name here is BGi
Yes a we need full map zoom out true.
Ty Frogboy . Has always you fast to answer us ,keep the good work.
Maybe to me and other strategists who follow this genre for many years ,we start to wonder something that has concerned us in this game. Maybe it will be working in the future but for now we do not know. There is literally no micro in this game, you pretty much just throw units at each other and let them fight for now. Ashes will be all this ? Can you guys tell us a bit more or the base game basically planned like this ? <p
with this being true ,i will go back to win 8.1 that will have dx 10 and maybe to games its fast then Os 10 that im using.
Yes true i run the Os 10 on ssd its brutal the speed compare to HD even if its a good hard drive like WD Black SSD its the future a bit expensive for now but soon all will change.
Its bether for all the first goal 2v2 and work well. Then a 4v4, because we now all wants that, and all complains because dont work well. Lets make 1 step after another not all same time. FAF got max 6v6 but we all now that in 10 games a usual 4v4 always have 7 games that some one drop or lag...
Well i think i get your point ,and if something that have to be worked its the maps , commands orders ( i have to make severel clicks just to give 1 order),and gameplay ,for now dont seems fit very well in this generic style. We need open field that alow us flow the battles,the maps we have now have too many rocks and Hills that kills the style make it very close to PA maps. But when map editor have full options and work well &
I honestly prefer a good complex gameplay then a lot units just fighting. Dont get me rong but have + 5k units dont mean a game can be good. We (they) only keep talk about FAF because its a game that keep grow after so many years ,and become a professional service like no other with normal players that are work on it without get any kind money ,so we have to respect what they have done. when GPG die , faf has boarn when no one belive could be
Yes this is happend to me . Almost every action i try to make with engeniers units or build dont react to my commands. I have to click several times to make just 1 action, and then the pan view left mouse click, also isnt help , bit confusing.
Im the only that havent problems? Win 10 RTM GTX Strix 980 TI+ GTX 780 to phisics I7 4790k 5.0 ghz on maximus border with watercooling from Crosair 35 gb ddr3 2400 (slow to 1886 because some problems) SSD samsung Im runing on dx 12 with crasy settings and really no problems at all for now but im on 1920x1200 on a lcd samsung 27 Maybe you guys try down the resolution a bit.</
Something i dont like its the too close zoom i cant view all the field has i want ,that will be a problem to enjoy the game and make fast decisions. And i dont like the left click mouse to pan view ,dont let micro and too many mistakes , do we have a option to swap that configuration? The rest bether then i was expect at this point. The music its really awsome where you guys grab the sound ideas, just feel good play with it. And dx 12 its really
Im using dx 12 and windows 10 all work great and really fast.
I havent try yet but, since Nvidea have done this to this game wy not respect them work and just forgot AMD that only have them drivers in 8/12 months. If we will wait to AMD then nvidea will now this game have no respect for them ...or im rong? I think something here in dx 12 AMD vs Nvidea im not get!!!
http://www.nvidia.co.uk/download/driverResults.aspx/89369/en-uk Nvidea released to AOTS the new DX 12 driver Version 355.60 WHQL </stro