Nitro Cruiser

Nitro Cruiser

Joined Member # 640074
0 Posts 51 Replies 25,992 Reputation

[quote]How do you define socialism? The Soviet Union, et al were not socialist, any more than Hitler was. Myanmar and Cuba are fascist, plain and simple.[/quote] There is two definitions of Socialism, the real one that exists in history and today, and the imaginary, idealist one that exist as a possibility only in the minds of people such as yourself. How someone can twist an idea into something that has repeated proved not to work is beyond me. Your world would need to wipe all emoti

21 Replies 17,474 Views

[quote who="Dr Guy" reply="17" id="2718525"] It wouldn't affect the outcome (and shouldn't) but I for one think that George W. Bush is a useful moderate voice. Tool Progressively corrected. [/quote] [e digicons]:rofl:[/e] [e digicons]:rofl:[/e] [e digicons]:rofl:[/e] [e digicons]:rofl:[/e] good one!

19 Replies 20,680 Views

[quote]It wouldn't affect the outcome (and shouldn't) but I for one think that George W. Bush is a useful moderate voice.[/quote] I must agree with most of the comments here. Bush's silence shows his class, and just exposes the political ugliness of Carter, Clinton, and Obama. Nobody hates this more than liberals, who believe they have a lock on class and sophistication. I'm positive this drives them up a wall. Plus there are no sound bites to be taken out of context, no unflattering

19 Replies 20,680 Views

[quote]They could get Sharia law in - they would just have to change the constitution first. There is not way, short of an invasion, that they could impose sharia law on anybody.[/quote] Excellent point Basmas. However, it reminds me of the illegal immigrant issue. We didn't hear about that much until the late 70's early 80's. Now the illegals are a large enough group that laws are ignored and some politicians bend over backward to accommodate them. Hindsight is 20/20, but we have ple

138 Replies 313,873 Views

[quote]So while I don't support it I'm not going to actively appose it.[/quote] Long time no see Stubby. Probably a reasonable position since it seems any position seen as overly patriotic (amazing how that post-9/11 solidarity has dissipated so quickly) gets the racist or intolerant label. The only reason I wouldn't oppose it is because it is legal under our laws, despite how I personally feel. I do believe they should look at where the funding is coming from, and if one cent

19 Replies 20,680 Views

You know you just seem to be spouting out other peoples philosophy, and none of your own. Have you been to a socialist country for more than a weeks vacation at a resort? I'm not talking about your pseudo-socialist country like Norway and Sweden, more like Myanmar, Cuba, Nepal or Laos. Then if you're still singing the praises of socialism, I'll refrain from suggesting you trade that Tr in for a P.

21 Replies 17,474 Views

[quote]I had to take a minute to remember this article I wrote so long ago now. You bring up an interesting point Nitro. I was wondering where you were in the discussion as I looked over a few of the pages to refamiliarize myself with the subject matter. [/quote] First, sorry KFC I should have been clearer in my inital comment. It was a comment by Chuck that led me (back) to your article (his comment, not his article, it yours). After re-reading my my comment it just plain comes

184 Replies 76,297 Views

[quote]Realistically, looking at profit reports for many companies seems to show strong returns and healthy business. Simply going out to a mall or a restaurant seems to give plenty of reason to say that the economy MUST be improving, and yet, well, employers aren't hiring. They are -- at least according to reports (which make a lot of sense given what you see when you look beyond the surface -- sitting on their piles of profit/cash and waiting for the market to improve before they decide to

4 Replies 2,412 Views

[quote]When it comes to a pissing contest, gays will lose, and most know it, so they do not go along with it.[/quote] Yeah, I have my opinion on the controversy. I'm not really interested in the right or wrong of it. What does interest me is the position of the commenter's here. Would they support the opposition now that the position is reversed, or keep to the group they support despite the which side of the boycott the two parties are on. I remember this article when it first appear

184 Replies 76,297 Views

[quote]Why insult McDonald employees? They at least have an HONEST job.[/quote] Oh don't misunderstand me, it was a compliment. If an incompetent (even one with a wonderful personality) can be elected to the presidency, imagine what a young, competent McDonald's worker can aspire to? The world is their oyster.

44 Replies 15,298 Views

I ran across this "heated" article and while it is a subject I'm not very interested in personally, I am interested in the human condition as a whole. That said, let me get to the point. Apparently something has occurred in stark contrast to Chucks article here. Target (and Best Buy) has donated a large sum of cash to a Republican, I will assume for his pro business stance. It turns out this Republican politician is not a fan of the gay agenda. Now gay activists are proposing a boycot

184 Replies 76,297 Views

[quote]http://www.religioustolerance.org/worldrel.htm A weird and most interesting table.[/quote] Leauki it was posted entirely to point out to DB that other religions would fill the void once he (hypothetically I assume) eradicated Christianity. The numbers seemed to jibe with other sources, but as far as the descriptive content, I'd probably be the last one to ask if any of it is correct.

103 Replies 282,713 Views

I find it amusing in a way. People that wouldn't piss on a Christian or Jew that was on fire, because it would go against their non or anti-religious beliefs, seem to be queuing up in support of Islam. Is it the school yard crowd mentality (you know the ones that yell fight, fight)? Is it the perception that any enemy of my enemy is my friend? Or is it the perception that religious people are conservative, so normally non-religious liberals or progressives (some not all) just see it as a mean

138 Replies 313,873 Views

[quote] Gawd bless the people of the state of Illinois and the federal prosecutors that will work on putting him away for good, lord knows they'll need the help.[/quote] I say they get what they deserve. Continually vote in scumbags, don't expect an angel. I feel sorry only for the ones to young to vote and then even they are off the list after 18.

3 Replies 3,563 Views

[quote]Why? in 2012 he will have more experience than Obama did.[/quote] DG you know how to set a low bar! I'm seen kids in McDonald's with more leadership qualities. [e digicons];)[/e]

44 Replies 15,298 Views

[quote]I consider a military career good experience for politics. It's as good as having served as a senator for 20 years and better.[/quote] I would agree with that to a point, but still no pass from me. If I had served with the man, maybe I'd feel different, but I'm looking at him like any other person would. I've seen plenty of officers in the military I wouldn't trust to supervise cleaning the floor, let alone be president. For example: At the Pentagon Colonels fetch coffee for th

44 Replies 15,298 Views

[quote]As for US President, I support Lieutenant Colonel Allen West.[/quote] I like the way this guy speaks too, but president? I believe that is a bit premature. I'm really tired of the "man/or woman of the minute" being held up as the solution without having produced many tangible results. I believe the current president is a prime example of that folly. If Col. West can preform consistently as well as he speaks, I'd back him 100% in a heartbeat, but not because he i

44 Replies 15,298 Views

[quote]I do not see them as needing any excuses. They have already demonstrated they are going to do what they want and the rest of the world be damned. Whether the reactor goes into use or not, they will continue to refine the ore for the weapons program.[/quote] My feelings as well. I'm not opposed to any nation wanting nuclear generated electrical power, although Iran certainly doesn't pass the smell test, floating on a sea of oil. One would think building a refinery (

10 Replies 14,270 Views

[quote]If they can do it it removes a huge argument that Iran has for going after nuclear fuel and technology as it will have the nuclear power it says it needs but without the ability to get weapon grade uranium.[/quote] It makes one curious why they insist on refining their own uranium. They can't make the fuel rods that will be used at Bashir.

10 Replies 14,270 Views

As long as Russia is paid for the facility, fuel, and no Russians are killed, it is my belief Russia couldn't care less about the plant being destroyed. In fact it would void any maintenance responsibilities they would be liable for. It's all about cash for them.

10 Replies 14,270 Views

[quote]The propagated myth that Obama is super smart continues to abound, even when all evidence points to the fact he is not even smart. But that is the wishful thinking of the left, egged on by the media. [/quote] If ever there was a clear (and recent) example of this, it is with the proposed mosque near ground zero in New York. The WH released a statement that this matter should be handled locally. It was a smart move, after all does the president have to comment on every event tha

44 Replies 15,298 Views

I don't believe Israel will be bothered if the plant is fueled. Any residual radiation might keep people away. I believe they will wait until the Russians are out of there. Interesting times to say the least.

10 Replies 14,270 Views

[quote]Nitro, you forgot the border up there which falls under immigration mostly illegal immigration. Unless you think it'll be resolved by 2012.[/quote] True, I didn't mention the boarder directly, but I view that issue as an economic one. The cost of doing nothing is huge. I am aware that the left wants to make it a race issue. I'll stick to it being economic with national security overtones. Jobs are still #1 IMO. Conservatives usually put more emphasis on matters of national secu

44 Replies 15,298 Views

[quote]Nitro, they need to be open, otherwise liberals won't vote for them. Liberals will happily vote for a candidate who is against gay marriage (like Obama), but they won't vote for one whom they they cannot present to their friends as an "open-minded" candidate.[/quote] You'd have to show me proof that any liberal will vote for a conservative to begin with (not to be confused with Democrats). Liberals make up about 20% of the population. Liberals want more spending on programs and

44 Replies 15,298 Views