[quote]So who will run? I think moderates now want a conservative candidate, and by "conservative" I mean "normal"; something in the general Bill Clinton - George H. W. Bush - Ronald Reagan region. Someone who will run the economy as it used to be done but is totally open to gay marriage and other new causes. And it seems to me like Americans want a somewhat stronger foreign policy than current.[/quote] I don't believe we'll know until the first or second quarter of next ye
Nitro Cruiser
Well if an entrepreneur's business doesn't make money they get a pay cut. Perhaps we need performance based salaries in government. 10% unemployment and the must give back 10% of their pay. Over budget spending by 15%, then a 15% pay cut. Things would straighten out in a hurry.
[quote]Republicans will likely run Sarah Palin against him, still not realising that moderates and liberals simply won't vote for her and those[/quote] I doubt she runs, unless something drastically changes.
[quote who="Dr Guy" reply="1" id="2712120"]In answer to the question - Is Chavez listening - the answer is a deafening NO. What is happening in Venezuela is not something new. It has been seen in numerous countries in the past (and present - see Zimbabwe). [/quote] DG I don't believe this author responds to comment.
Well at the very least you got a good story out of the whole thing. I could see telling it to acquaintances over the years. Nobody got hurt that's what is important.
I believe the state should be responsible for the Senator or Congressman's salary and that of their entourage. Voters might take it into consideration then. At the very least it would cut out those late night "pay raise" votes. I wish I had a job where I decided the amount of my regular pay raise.
[quote]hmmmm so that means no babies will be named George in the near future? I don't see any little Judas' or Adolph's running around. So I guess George will be next on the list of what NOT to name your baby.[/quote] Just feel bad for the brief batch of "Barack's", they'll have it very rough. Not too many other examples to fall back on. Even "Jimmy" was a safer bet. [e digicons]:rofl:[/e]
[quote]The first is to create social programs to counteract the effects of poverty in the lower class, and the second is to tax the upper class.[/quote] This has been done (and it continues increasingly to this day), has it eliminated poverty? Has it reduced it? When you make everyone poor, who pays those taxes then? Some how, I don't believe that (if indeed you are of working age and are employed) you asked your employer to give you only what is needed for pay or you use only the min
[quote]Socialism looks good on more than paper- look at Norway and Sweden's labor parties. The whole purpose of socialism is to overcome the evils of corporate ownership.[/quote] Well Sweden doesn't seem to have a problem pushing Skandia and Saab (to name a few) abroad. I guess it's OK to be a capitalist outside the country. Population: <td style="padding-left: 0
[quote][disclaimer]This comment is in no way to be taken as insightful, because after all, I play too many video games and watch too many cartoons.[/disclaimer][/quote] Agreed! [e digicons]:thumbsup:[/e]
[quote]I'm glad there are folks out there to pray for the rest of us, it can't hurt. And this is not only smart but very nice to say. [/quote] [quote]you got that right and I'll put you on "the list." [/quote] Thanks! [e digicons];)[/e]
[quote]The sad part is that you can only find open and honest articles like that in foreign newspapers. The American MSM will not touch their golden boy.[/quote] I wonder when/if realization will (ever) set in? When exactly does self-preservation kick in? Or will they continue to deteriorate into irrelevance?
Interesting. One government job that I used to hold (as a defense contractor) a while back, all employees were instructed not to say Merry Christmas, Happy Easter, etc., unless the client said it first. It was punishable by termination and was mandated by the government SLA's. The statement looks like some PC BS to let this particular group know big brother "cares". Touching.
[quote]The only man-made fusion device yet to achieve ignition is the hydrogen bomb, but you can just take a 93 million mile jaunt and pick up a handful for yourself.[/quote] BT actually they have been able to achieve a controlled fusion (the Joint European Torus produced 16.1 megawatts of fusion power sustained for over 0.5 sec in 1997). Sustaining it is the problem. I hope they figure this one out because it will solve many problems but it still won't elimin
As an outsider looking in, the list of accomplishments looks like more burden for the taxpayer. Socialism might work well for small population countries with vast natural resources, good luck with it.
[quote]I personally can't equate a state capable of only administering most of it's internal affairs and none externally, with the rest of the world, as a nation. The globalists at the UN are attempting to move us towards a one-world government set-up. It's called Globalism. Country after country will give up their sovereignty and people will be forced to give up their property rights. The education system is teaching globalism now. [/quote] Lula, you know I do understand w
[quote]Nitro..I concur with your reply #46. In fact, I could have written most of that myself including the fact that I don't call myself religious either. Although admittedly it is one of my favorite topics because I think there is just way too much confusion in this area about the difference between those who profess to be a believer and those who truly possess a true faith. People automatically think because you're religious, belonging to an upstanding church you must be good. [/quote]
I don't blame the cops, though I think putting you up against the car, not face down on the ground would have been enough. As pointed out you're not a minority so your civil rights weren't violated, not that I believe they were no matter what color your skin. Mason, s ounds like if you would have stayed for one more beer at Applebee's, all would have been good. Glad you weren't out for a walk without an alibi. Didn't the cite the kid for false accusation?
[quote]It would be culturally acceptable! So would that mean we would be recognizable to the world? [/quote] Many Native Americans burned their enemies alive on open fires. We could do that citing "cultural" reasons. Bless those liberals, they would place a napkin around the neck of a cannibal before being eaten.
Socialism is wonderful until the elites feel they don't need to share, or are above the rest. With capitalism, the consumer decides which corporations will be successful. Build or produce crap that nobody wants, their gone. One system rewards success, the other distributes it and stymies innovation. Here's a simple way to tell, look at which systems have produced the most innovations benefiting humanity. History is full of Socialist failure. If capitalism is in trouble, it's because too many
[quote]All evidence that you have shown on these boards applies to each and every diety [/quote] Probably because most religions tend to borrow elements from earlier ones. It is evolving as we speak... splinter groups, policy changes, etc.
[quote]Are there black holes? Have any been detected? Don't think so. The "black hole" is an extreme theory for which there is no substantial evidence.[/quote] Lula, I'm going to disagree here. I believe scientists have observed the gravitational forces of these phenomenon. I haven't researched it myself, and I could be wrong, but I seem to recall something about it on Discovery or the Science channel.
[quote]Hey it was your choice of words in your accusation that I wanted to just eliminate christianity.[/quote] My choice of words? I just quoted you. What would give me any indication that anyone wanted to eliminate any religion, unless they stated it themselves? Not something I would believe would come up in a casual conversation. [quote]Also, define insightful, because the definition I'm picking up from you is nodding my head up and down in agreement with e
[quote]I note with amusement that they list "No Religion" and "Atheism" separately. Seems that atheism is a religion.[/quote] Perhaps they are trying to differentiate between Atheists and Agnostics, I assume there are subtle differences, or maybe there are some that are just unaware of any particular religion.
[quote]also, Nitro, the fact that you are completely incapable of understanding sarcasm concerns me for your future. Maybe when you grow up a little bit you can participate in the adults' conversations.[/quote] Perhaps you should take your own advice about an "adult" conversation, as this one markedly went juvenile at comment #5. Oh, is this quote more sarcasm? [quote] I plan on eliminating all the cults, oh sorry Religions, because none of them have done