Madine
I tried deleted all the files and redownloading. Still the same problem: Stardock SmartException Logging Information ------------------------------------------- OS Version : Windows 98 Video Card : NVIDIA GeForce2 MX/MX 400 Application Exception code: C0000005 ACCESS_VIOLATION Crash Addr: 00505AEE 01:00104AEE C:\PROGRAM FILES\STARDOCK\DRENGIN.NET\POLMACHINE\POLMACHINE.EXE Processor Registers (x86): EAX:00
I didn't mean that we needed to pull the rug out right away. I meant that in the long term, our strategy needs to be for there to be change in Saudi Arabia. Obviously we can't just go around knocking over governments left and right.
Sending food is easy. The hard part is securing and distributing it.
Or it could be time for France/Germany to step up and do something constructive. I'm not holding my breath though.
The images of abuse in Abu Ghraib alone would disqualify America as a credible bringer of democracy to the Middle East. That's a stupid statement. A handful of criminal soldiers doesn't reflect an entire nation. The Saudi regime definitely has to change. The article is very right that Western n
The big reason I never even considered owning an Apple computer was the lack of software available. Of course, most software comes from 3rd party developers.
Many of you may not be aware of a colorless chemical that threatens everyone in America and the world. Despite its dangers, Dihydrogen Monoxide (DHMO) continues to be commonly used by industry and the government. A helpful website, DHMO.org , provides further information. Here are some of the dangers acco
you will find China at the top as of 2001 with 409 million barrels a day with Norway and the UK in third and fourth, Mexico at eigth. That list includes oil products, not just crude. Norway, UK, and Mexico are all major producers of crude oil. <TABLE cellpadding=8 width="95%" align=center bgC
This is quite silly. Maybe I could understand why we might not want to, say, feed food made in Israel to Muslims. But bullets? "It's ok to shoot these people, but we better not use Israeli bullets."
Of course the US is not stealing Iraq's oil. The idea of stealing was presented as a hypothetical. The point about Iraq's oil exports is the following: "It is rediculous to suggest that the US invaded Iraq to gain profits from oil because even if the US stole all of the oil Iraq is exporting, it would take years to pay off the $100 billion+ the US has already spent on Iraq." I fail to understand how Iraq's pre-war exports are
Hey Drag, did you ever notice how those exports are post-war estimates? You'd be amazed what conquering a country can do to the economy of said country. No kidding they're post-war exports! IF THE US IS FIGHTING A WAR TO STEAL OIL, HOW ARE THEY SUPPOSED TO STEAL IRAQ'S PRE-WAR EXPORTS? Anything o
The goal of the occupation is to keep Iraq from getting out of control until an Iraqi government and security force is strong enough to handle the situation on its own. The basic problem with the insurgents isn't that they are willing to die, but that they are well hidden and/or hiding in religious sites. The challenge of fighting the insurgency isn't overpowering them, it is locating them.
Recently, the insurgents have mainly been attacking Iraqis, not Americans. if it wasn't then the interim authority would have authority over american forces. Although the troops are still under American command, the interim authority is in charge.
5. Decides that Iraq shall provide UNMOVIC and the IAEA immediate, unimpeded, unconditional, and unrestricted access to any and all, including underground, areas, facilities, buildings, equipment, records, and means of transport which they wish to inspect, as well as immediate, unimpeded, unrestricted, and private access t
Come on now... When something bad happens, it is because the Bush Administration is incompetent. When something that seems good happens, it is part of an underhanded conspiracy by the Bush Administration. What do you think the Reagan/Bush administrations did that was so terrible?
Can we please stop pretending the war in Iraq was to do with terrorists. It wasn't, so don't weaken the arguement by suggesting it was. Saddam funded terrorism. Saddam had meaningful contacts with Al Qaeda. (see this NY Times article, registration required). <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/25/po
What's BQ?
What bugs me the most is that people I see on TV issue mild compliments while tap-dancing around the issue of the movie's distortion of the truth. "Poetic truth", "thought-provoking", "interesting opinions". Give me a break.
The maximum income for a couple to receive any benefits is $16,000 Wrong. That is the maximum income for someone to get a $600 credit to assist them with drug costs. However, medicare beneficiaries above that income can still save money with a prescription drug card.
Worldwide, there is much opposition to the Iraqi war. It has been said many times that Saddam was not a serious enough threat to warrant an invasion. It is often not mentioned that a major reason why Saddam wasn't an imminent threat was that harsh measures were imposed upon Iraq because of the Kuwait invasion and the subsequent failure to participate in weapons inspec
Didn't we just pass a new prescription drug benefit that spends billions of dollars to reduce prescription drug prices?
Your assumption is that my choosing Libertarian is baseless. The most flagrantly baseless generalization you have is voting for women. I don't consider party affiliation to be a baseless generalization.
Is anyone going to actually read this cover to cover?
When I think of an entrepeneur in the business sense, I think of someone who starts a very small business and builds it into a medium or large business. I looked up the definition of entrepreneur on Google, and I found 3 common themes in the definitions. 1. Risk I think a good evaluation of an entrepreneur is how much of their personal wealth was/is invested in the enterprise. Putting their personal livelihood at stake