kenwas

kenwas

Joined Member # 645129
0 Posts 105 Replies 1,617 Reputation

Sorry about the bad link in previous post. You might want to read thw fine print of what you agree to when you use the browser. http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-10030522-56.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-5

50 Replies 62,414 Views

Thanks for the tips. Some look great. The link however was not about add ons but about the things expected in the new 3.1 version when released as far as speed improvements are concerned. Thanks again for the add-ons!

34 Replies 122,570 Views

The advance of Trace Monkey promises some significant improvement and edge for FF. You might find the attached of interest. [link="http://prosenjit23.wordpress.com/2008/08/25/the-new-faster-and-better-mozilla-firefox-31/"]WWW Link[/link]

34 Replies 122,570 Views

[quote]It has always been accepted practise to allow such OS copying/porting and, as far as I can recall there has only been two formal objections from the IP owners - both adhered-to.[/quote] If porting in this manner, cloning, or whatever we are calling it, is not improper use of others images why were the request for removal adhered to? [quote]Now, if skinner A were to make a variation of BeOS to 'skin' Windowblinds that's fine and dandy. If skinner B then did the same no-o

49 Replies 44,280 Views

[quote]Difference is partly, one is a private entity and the other is corporate.[/quote] I do not sell skins but if I did, I would certainly take in the revenue via an LLC at the least for a whole variety of reasons. Unless, by corporate you mean publicly traded and I see no difference there. A company might decide that the stopping of a skin causes more bad PR than it is worth, but that is another matter entirely as it is merely a temporary decision until they decide otherwise. They

49 Replies 44,280 Views

[quote]Since Day One in skinning it has always been acceptable practise to port an OS graphics to another program. The earliest I can remember was Amiga to Litestep....that was around '97 or '98. Currently you have Vista's default graphics ported to Windowblinds so they end up on XP, say. There is one proviso, however...on any of these 'ports'. If and when the OS 'owner' decides it is not acceptable the offending work is removed.[/quote] I struggle with the logic here. Would it also

49 Replies 44,280 Views

[quote]One of the "causes" is that people are resetting the skin dates for minor updates, that has been addressed with the moderators. Much of this stuff is not for public consumption because it leads to flames and other issues that are not related with the problem at hand.[/quote] Fair enough!

72 Replies 193,398 Views

[quote]You were quick to jump on the misbehavior but seemingly ignored the causes.All I got was "we see all,we know all".pffft[/quote] It is my view that the causes were never fully addressed in a definitive manner and that led to the frustration and "misbehavior". Even now, the conversation remains about forum etiquette rather than addressing the questions raised by IR, vstyler and others. If a group of masters feel that something is amiss and needs correction, I view that as

72 Replies 193,398 Views

[quote]It seems that I always miss the posts that lead up to these threads.[/quote] It wasn't a post but a string of comments on a WB upload, which seems to have been deleted from the main gallery at this point.

72 Replies 193,398 Views

In relation to the work involved Master skins are incredibly inexpensive. This concept of "free" is always amusing to me as if anything worth having was ever truly free. Somebody is paying somewhere for everything. The exchange of dollars for services/goods is a blessed event.

99 Replies 214,648 Views