Pic...what hippy is talking about and what you did are two different things.You did it with graphics and content margins.He's talking about being able to specify a specific size for the elements of the start menu.(like the skinny places menus)
Show-off!
hmmmmmmmm.... [Message Edited]
WinCustomize Forums
Why the difference between CRT and TFT?My video card is only giving me the option for 1280 x 1024 even tho I am on a CRT.
About 30
WinCustomize Forums
The next one past that is of course 1600 x 1200.Which would be correct.
WinCustomize Forums
Maybe its my ati allin wonder video card,still dosnt make sense.TV is at the same screen ratio as the standard PC screen.
If mathmatically the next resolution beyond 1024 and 1152 is 1280,how come 1280 x1024 is the next available resolution instead of 1280 x960?
I wonder how you contact SD about this?They havnt responded to any of my emails about a problem I've been having for over a month now. [Message Edited]
Not to mention the thousands of people who would then have the "old "version.
Damn SDC wont let me update WB,even if it would and this is the "new" way,I would have to go back and "fix " my other skins and then they wouldnt work right for anyone who hadnt or couldnt update. >
way cool!
The real problem here is not how to make it work(we know how to do that),it is why are we even having a problem at all?They should be rendering the same across the different versions.
Didnt know you had posted stephen..
Did it work?
Wont work...still wont line up unless the "places "graphic is made to line up with either 28 or 30.The best you could do would be to have a subskin for the different versions,but why?This shouldnt be happening.Most people wouldnt bother to figure out the difference.They would just assume you had a problem with your skin and load something else.
The setting is in the navigation tree under ...system tray...clock...look to the right and you should be able to specify color and font.The mistake I made in the past was not setting both color settings(Normal wb3x and Normal)I have SS 3.0.0 and WB4.
Chef! congrats Keila!
Bones...what your doing works on your PC but not mine.We think it is because of the different WB versions.If you replace the "more programs "graphic with solid black and take a SS,you will see that it dosnt matter what size the original graphic is,WB's will render it at (probably)...28 pixels tall...(because you useWB 4.1).If I do the exact same thing,I get 30 pixels tall.(because I am using WB 4). This is what is causing a 2 pixel shift in the original romulus WB.It works for WB 4.1
Crap! it was late...# 27 I got exactly backwards.Stephen ,Im not helping much am I? >
Stephen I think we got them confused.I know I am now.Post#33 should have said "places" instead of "programs"
They are different in each one on purpose.It is the height of the more programs graphic that we are trying to line up TO.(with the different "programs "graphics.)(thats why one is called 150 and one is called 152).If the "more programs graphic is 28 pixels tall then the "150 "version works.If it is 30 (like on myPC),then it HAS to be the 152 version.We think its because I am still using WB4,not 4.1.Now does it make sense? <img src="http://images.stardock.com/images/smiles/joke.gif" border=0 ALIG
Bones your not getting this for some reason but thanks for trying.Thanks Koasati!
To make this perfectly clear...the problem is really how many pixels high is the "more programs " graphic.On my PC (withWB4)it is exactly30 pixels.On pictoratus's PC it is apparently 28 pixels tall.Thats why the 2 versions with a difference of 2 pixels.We want to know which version works on your PC and what version of WB's you have.
We know how to make it work,...we want to know WHY is it different on different systems.It seems to be one way forWB4 and another for WB4.1.So far everyone with WB4 can use 150.Everyone with WB 4.1 needs 152!This is a major drag when your designing a skin!