[quote]I just love the idea that you can now recolor your icons.[/quote] I just hate the idea that with new IconPackager version AND new Icondevelopper version WE CAN'T RECOLOR ANYMORE ICONPACKAGES and save them as Iconpackages
France 3 points, France three points :LOL:
More info : [link="https://forums.wincustomize.com/308090"]WWW Link[/link]
[quote]Just to try it out Neo can you try though Impulse?[/quote] I didn't want to install Impulse for now (very bad souvenir from big problems when SDC came out and Component Manager was still there ...), but i finally did ... well tried to because installation feels strange (:( 1°) when i enter my serial (copy and paste fron SDC) for Object Desktop, i've an error message telling me [I]"The registration you have entered is invalid. Please check your select product, email adr
It seems there's a glitch with downloading latest Iconpackager Version + Icon set through SDC ...
I think there may be kind of alternative solution : if you see explorer background there is two places in: one coresponding to "name" and the second for the other column titles ... Though if there's an option in WB which let user define if he want's to apply explorer backgrounds just on first part (name) it will be ok ... well not all the explorer background will be covered but at least one part ... :NOTSURE: (of course that's a cheap solution and there's probably better to do for de
:LOL: That's what i'm asking for : having both explorer backgrounds [B]AND[/B] shell images displaying correctly :p [quote]or,get shell images to support translucency[/quote] I think it will not be possible as they are .bmp's (:(
I also have the same trouble (since one week) with latest [B]IconPackager[/B] version on SDC (and i also clear cache, reset XML data and so ...) i've not Impulse installed and still on XP SP2 32 bit... with same kind of error message, just change the name off downloaded application in the error message as well as the logfile.
[quote]They were working fine on my machine[/quote] They have been working like it's figured on the screenie since the begining of "Explorer Backgrounds" with WB6 on my XP SP2 :SURPRISED: but with the same trouble of shell-pictures displaying and it's also the same with latest beta version which didn't change anything for me ... Wizard1956, do you mean that on a XP machine you had correct explorer backgrounds with correct shell_pictures ? no texture/color difference ? :SURPR
[quote]Maybe more resonses would have happend is this was under Stardock Support[/quote] Though everything (or nearlly) should be in Stardock support ... :LOL:
Who cares ? BUMP
It's a nice to have back in WindowBlinds features the possibility of Explorer Backgrounds ... I don't know how it's going on Vista but on XP, for special folders (pictures, music, control panel, ...) it's bringing a glitch because of shell images .bmp defined in skins ... example: ... and in that skin it's not too ugly because the s
WinCustomize Forums
[quote]Last I heard IE7 dosnt skin with windowblinds on XP...so no thanks. If I must go there,I guess it will be Firefox...but it dosnt skin with windowblinds properly either so... In other words,WB has precedence. (maybe while I'm suffering on Vista,IE7 is already there and skinned)[/quote] Same, but in french :LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL:
[quote]I have the newest version of ObjectDock[/quote] There's a new version of ObjectDock ? :SURPRISED:
[quote]If i am unsatisfied with a product that i have bought is there anyway to get my money back???[/quote] You'll have years to cry all your tears :LOL: :LOL: :LOL:
[quote]Something may be wrong, i just can't archive Version 3.99.144 ...[/quote] 1°) Ok i've been able to restore V 3.20.128 without activatin trouble. BUT after a reboot, as i want to download and archive V 3.99.144 (before updating IP) here's the .log error message: [copy On] -- [Application] ---------------------------------------------------- Name: Stardock Central Path: C:\Program Files\Stardock\SDCentral Version: 2.54.522, build: 167 -- [
[quote]neophil, how many times do you uninstall/reinstall softwares or [B]reformat your PC[/B]?[/quote] I think last time was on july last year, but uninstall/reinstall Stardock softwares much more times (specially WB and IconPackager ...) [quote]and almost never unsinstalled/reinstalled the soft from SD[/quote] Lucky guy
[quote]Activation thresholds are only to discourage piracy and a permanent activation file for that individual PC is created in the software directory of your purchase.[/quote] I don't really understand why it's neccessary for ODNT subscribers as a verification is already down with Stardock account ... [quote][B]It is labled as sig.bin and by simply placing it into the directory of the software[/B] (on the same PC it was created on)[/quote] I know that, though why is
Something may be wrong, i just can't archive Version 3.99.144 ...
Will this bad joke continue a long time ?
[quote]here's the mail i send to support @ stardock: [copy ON] Hi there, Again, i've got a message "maximum activation reached" or something like that when trying to install a correct version of IconPackager (Note that IP V 3.99.143 is still with the old graphic interface and that previous version in new one does not allow me to change language. I resume: V 3.99.143 ==> old interface with french / V 3.99d[ b ].062 or previous ==> new interface but can't apply french la
up up
... and up ... :d
up again :(
As too much often, i've had a problem with "excessive activation ..." silly message on Saturday. I've immediately send an email to [email protected] but did'nt receive an automatic answer as i used to, giving a ticket etc ... [copy ON] Hi there, Again, i've got a message "maximum activation reached" or something like that when trying to install a correct version of IconPackager (Note that IP V 3.99.143 is still with the old graphic interface and that previ