[quote]I was just hoping to remind you of your humanity.[/quote] Oh,my, I must be misreading this![e digicons]:karma:[/e] I'm just as sick over the inhumane treatement of women over there as you are, but frankly, I'm worried more about the rampant abuse of women and little girls in our own country.[e digicons]k1[/e]
Finance committee on healthcare in introducing its infinite amendments to amendments is indicative of lawmakers sophistry and insincerity, reducing the Senate to brazen dysfunction and embarrassment. Republican members clearly favor protecting the rates and profits of the health industry under the aegis of the free market, while the Democrats contort reform with double talk by insisting on “change” that barely changes anything because it is constr
JoeUser Forums
[quote who="Nitro Cruiser" comment="17"]Obama love is in the air [/quote][quote who="Nitro Cruiser" comment="17"]Obama love is in the air [/quote][quote who="Nitro Cruiser" comment="17"]Obama love is in the air [/quote] Lots of bleeding heart for you to suck up.
JoeUser Forums
Huge blunder on Obama's part. Don't ignore the "enemy"; face up to them, see the white of their eyes and stick it to them. Pitch to murderers' row of Beck, Coulture, O'Reilly, Hannity and the like; perhaps even walk them if you can't strike them out.
JoeUser Forums
[quote]o yea, I’m sure they’d love to see the idea of health insurance paid for by tax payers, because it’s free for them.[/quote] This is precisely the point of the so-called reform to get the freeloaders to at least pay something, in lieu of flooding Emergemcy.
I think I've stated it somewhere else that emotions get in the way of debating an issue sincerely most of the times and that it is a dangerous road to use emotions and aggrevating each other as a campaign strategy because emotions always blur things - but it is the american way. You're kidding, right? I mean, you do know you're in Joeuser land?
Does a finely manufactured product really need the Martha Stewart signature? Won’t any thick bath towel dry the rump as well? Though I was a devout fan of Ted Williams, I thought—granted, testimonials were rampant— it imbecilic for Sears to have him endorse all its sporting products. Unfortunately, I didn’t think that way when at thirteen years of age, I "walked a mile for a Camel" on Joe DiMaggio’s say-so.
What’s wrong with a change of heart? For seven years Bush never had a heart in Afghanistan, but when Obama "dithers" even though he had committed forces there as one of his first acts in office, now he’s hesitant over committing more. Bravo. However. It’s wrong to keep troops already there in suspension. I say, just get the hell out of there, including Iraq. Nor is there any point—in order to win—in bombing them back to the Stone Age because Afghans have never le
[quote who="Daiwa" reply="3" id="2186861"] Good for you except for big government which is needed to keep the scattered children from mischief Curious perspective, given that it was the 'scattered children' which enumerated and granted limited powers to that government for specific purposes only in the first place. [/quote] Very good! However, it took strong founding fathers to get them in line.
Good for you except for big government which is needed to keep the scattered children from mischief--except Texas of course as it will soon be seceding.[e digicons]:beer:[/e]
[quote]LIVE here[/quote] But they do live here and set up business elsewhere to avoid taxes.
"rich people don't pay much in taxes because of the loopholes" No, it applies to almost everyone, but because the well-off have more bucks and have many avenues of shelter they manage to put away much more for a rainy day than do most others. May I suggest you look up Daschle's tax consultant? You might be able to write off your <a href="https://forums.joeuser.com/imgres?imgurl=http://cars.88000.org/wallpapers/80/Porsche_Boxster_987,_TechArt
I just assumed frogman was a Stardock partner. I had no idea Brad liked being a chameleon. I suppose #1 doesn't change. btw, today I have posted a blog on Nanny.
You don’t hear much today about the nanny state even though it is displayed in the full dress of overwhelming force. Criticism of nanny is ordinarily directed toward the welfare mother, pubic housing, government employees, social security and Medicaid, Medicare, even national emergency handouts, which has now become financial behemoths as too big to fail, when in faith we are told, the free market is capable of taking care of itself. Much like insurance companies notorious for exorbitan
Hey, man, no argument from me afterpleasantly agreeing with me!
I like the rhyme.
Spam
[quote]And who will be paying the Chinese when they cash in their T-bills?[/quote] By then they will have owned half the country.[e digicons]:cylon:[/e] Unless, of course the great big finance market comes to realize that investing in America as China does, inste
[quote]So you are calling him a liar?[/quote]Certainly not, nor do I know who Frogman is. The fact remains he must have lousy tax consultants.[e digicons]:pig:[/e]
[quote]According to the current administrations philosophy, we should tell the kids, let someone else study hard, and it will be their responsibility to take care of you.[/quote]Ho-hum, Just another tired rant against the alleged nanny state.[e digicons]:annoyed:[/e]
[quote]So in exchange for his military service he gets a progressive disability for the rest of his life and people acting like he's shit because he gets disability. [/quote] In spite of all the grandstanding about supporting our troops, these hardship scenarios are still prevalent. [e digicons]#:([/e]
[quote]Your half right this is the land of Oz, oblivious to what is happening. But it's not lions, tigers, and bears that concern me. It's Obama, Pelosi, and Reid oh my, that is the real nightmare.[/quote] Touche! to the man behind the curtain.<img class="mceIcon" src="https://forums.joeuser.c
First of all, I don’t want to hear anymore about the poor sacrificing US taxpayer shelling out hard earned money for bailouts—it’s the hard working Chinese tax payer who’s doing the bailing out. Sure, our great grandchildren will eventually get the bill in the mail, but by that time it will be inconsequential inasmuch as China shall have claimed ownership of the good old USA. As for Geithner it’s too soon to judge—in light of current up
[quote]Looks to me like they were doing their job and upheld the Constitution instead of changing it.[/quote] Looks to me like you're really going strong in exercizing the mind.[e digicons]:)[/e]
[quote]okinawa from a couple years back.[/quote] Aye, and I was on Okinawa; the closer to their homeland the fiercer they got.