Twisting Ideology Ideology was first meant to be science of ideas and policy designed to set in motion societal reform. By the Mid 19 th century it became emotionally charged by religious and political delusions bereft of systemic philosophic coherence and hardly worthy of political theory as in such likes of Plato, Hobbes, Hegel, Kant and the Federalist Papers. Because he aligned his work with Hegel—thereby erroneously
JoeUser Forums
Stop worrying, Rush will never have to face the stern democrat death panels--he can afford private care.
Big money never dries up.
[e digicons];)[/e] And Lee Cheney, the virgin Mary?
[quote]During WWII the media was on our side, since then they have not been and we lose.[/quote]Have you already forgotten the embedded reporters in Iraq, jazzing up the war and waving the flag?
You're getting too intramural for me, boys. One thing: if there's minimum wage, how is it there's not a cap on maximum wage? Oh, on second thought maybe there is and why there are bonuses.
[quote quoting="post"]Just imagine for one second if Reid was a republican. He would be forced to resign, but since Reid is a democrat the media ignores it, and he won't take much heat from it. [/quote] Same tired old cry; the poor republicans are always getting picked on and bullied. The fact is it's just another example of a Biden like gaff. Reid, as well as Trent should know better.
Though it seems rational not to view things by ideology, the happenings of the times is geared to partisanship; Obama's call for bipartisanship fell on deaf ears big time. Take the majority leader's current situation: lefties see it as racism, righties see only the double standard when connected to Trent Lott. The true issue is that both senators—Lott and Reid—are awful wordsmiths. However, Trent Lott is a southern conservative, and perhaps even privately wishes for the good old d
How did his amazing golf focus, a gift from his Asian mother, turn into a sex fetish?
[quote]Let me know when you ask for minimum wage at your next job, so you can give back something[/quote] Let me know when you ask for an outlandish bonus so you can give back something.[e digicons]:beer:[/e]
[quote]Liberals never give, they just take. But they expect everyone else to give.[/quote] I doubt you really believe that.
[quote]Everyone is out for themselves, which seems logical because who else will be?[/quote]Still, whether a dream or not, there has to be a matrix of some semblance of cooperative spirit or we'll all fo the way of the Mideast. Though you seem optimistic here: [quote]Agreed, not all o
[quote]The terrorists were too busy looking for the dead leader they did not have time to attack us.[/quote]Tell that to 250 dead marines. But you're right to a degree; too many of these terrorists thrive on the publicity.
[quote]I'm counting on that being true, Paladin.[/quote]It probably is correct, but the hundreds of arrests are dwarfed by a single incident resulting in disaster. As said many times the terrorists are riding the gamble that it only takes one mistake.
[quote]You cannot keep the adrenaline flowing 24x7.[/quote] Fox and Msnbc try to.
In browsing: "Pension Fund and Illinois shareholder Ken Brown alleges that Goldman's much-criticized compensation plan is not structured in the best interest of shareholders.... Citing New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo's July report, Brown's lawsuit states that "Goldman earned $2.3 billion, paid out $4.8 billion in bonuses and received $10 billion in TARP funding." The lawsuit argues that the bank's 2008 bonuses were subsidized with taxpayer money. At issue in both lawsuits is whether or
Holy Cow!
[quote]You're obviously not following that movement closely[/quote] This much I know: baggers claim greater numbers than actually are but they probably are counting Birthers. You obviously did not follow my satire.
[quote]It was more a generic dissertation for those trying to shame the US for using them.[/quote]Aye, mate, couldn't agree more.
Do you think Tiger Woods would have won even more tournaments had he not been sexting on his rounds?
Obama is over zealous in offering tax incentives or credits for domestic green industries in order to broach the labor famine. What is wrong with this county that it cannot get its citizenry to "ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country"? What industry would not be proud to take part in building the future without expecting handouts. Haven’t we had enough of that since Nov. ‘08? Yet why are so many employers so will
"Failure to connect the dots"—deja vu. What this means is the failure to connect various agencies concerned. Yet even this rationalization doesn’t address the issue of human sloth and incompetence. Perhaps the solution lies in awarding these agencies bonuses when in the unlikely event they arrest the terrorists before boarding the plane. Wait! Just as with the Wall Street Dummies, don’t these government employees already get a living wage? When is enough, enough?
[quote] far more pronounced than the Republican party[/quote] Yeah, right, Republicans are all baggers.
What ever happened to company loyalty. Ah, the way it was!
[quote] then it is many people, not a Feinberg.[/quote] Do you think this Czar will get a bonus?
PolMach Forums