I still feel like I have paid for fixes that should have been free anyway. Support for the previous release has been dead for how long ? 2 years ? To state my point :
Jan71
I had a working 1.9 (with a workaround to get everything working on Vista 64) and paid a few months ago for the new beta. Except a slight improvement of stability, and no issues on 64bit installations (I mean no workaround needed) I really don't see a difference between both. This one product is very promising, has always been, but as it is, it looks as development is dead. Asking to pay for a beta just to get the issues ironed out of a official release (which I already paid f
to little-whip what do ou mean ? As far as I know, the latest and greatest is still Vista. Windows7 is only available as Beta. I don't see my dad or mum install that. So the previous version would be XP. So you claim that no regular, non-weenie ypes have tried XP ? It has been there for, what, seven years ? On top, many people I know got scared of Vista because of the negative "geek press". Once they installed Vista - surprise - they found it perfect for their needs. Just
Ok, this time installing from Stardock Central did work. Thanks for the tip. (Altough I tried this before and then it did not work ? Software behaves strange sometimes). First thing I did was to make a backup [e digicons]:andrew:[/e] . What I am concerned, they can take all the time they need to get OD+ to release 2.0 succesfully, now.
[e digicons]X|[/e] The thing is, it was working fine before ... I know there is no such thing as bug free software, not even in the pinky Apple world or Linux. I am not bashing the product, only that I bought a working product, somehow it got broke after an update and now there is no way to restore it to the previous working version. P.S. I found a workaround in another thread on this forum to get the Start Button working again. create a new
Messiah, please stop. I checked my settings in Impulse, and Archive before update is Checked. But there is no backup available ? It looks I was hit by two glitches in two different softwares, both coming from Stardock. Seen the status of the project, I think they (Stardock) lost their backup as well. Otherwise I don't see a reason why they can not to put that working version online again. Seen the high number of complaints here, I think it is time they (StarDock) get their act
I can not speak for the others, but I put of buying OD+ until it was reporting working under 64bit. And one mont after I paid my good money, it suddenly stopped. No more systray, no more start button. I tried to go back to the previous update, but couldn't. I tried everything to get the "Start button" working again, but I couldn't. And I am not a computer Noob that does not know what he is doing. So I am stuck, I could as well have stayed with the free version of
"I believe that if you were to uninstall OD+, and reinstall an earlier version of it through Impulse or SD Central, you should have your tray support again. I haven't bothered to try it cuz it's not a huge deal to me personally." Yes, but for some obscure reason, Stardock removed the old vista x64 capable version from the servers, and refuses to put it back. Some people could roll back with SD Central (SD Central makes local backups), but I uninstalled tha
I was on the same track and have the same problem. I wanted to downgrade OD plus because after installing the latest version from Impulse, after I lost my systray icons on my vista 64 system (what was not really a big deal), now I can not use the Start menu anymore ! Message : this funcion is not supported on 64bit. I swear it was working before ! And this is really annoying, because I do a LOT with the start button. End result, I uninstalled OD for the time being, until
I have Vista Ultimate, and I am not vexed at all. It was only a matter of time before someone else unlocked this "feature" on all Vista editions. I mean, the possibility is there (Vista Aero). As long they don't use the same code as Dreamscene, and charge money for that, I don't see a problem. And I run most of the time with it turned off anyway, because of the "driver stopped working" messages
or just boot into linux command line. Do not install Gnome or the like. at least you get a full fledged streamlined modern OS without any overhead running. I doubt you can use the full potential of your 4 GB Ram and 64 bit processor with DOS.
and who is going to buy a top brand name PC without OS ? I prefer to pick the parts myself, last pc was 2/3 of the money for 3/2 of the speed
same problem here. as a stardock customer for years now, this message came as a bad surprise. please get it fixed ... Jan
For me the real OS/2 started with 2.0. That is when Microsoft got out. The OS was vastly superior to anything Microsoft produced until windows XP. It took them 15 years to catch up, and a lot of cash ! Only to say how important marketing is in our modern world. Microsoft cheated by adapting the win32 API regularly, so IBM was always playing catch up on the compatibility side. And apparently they blackmailed PC manufacturers to install windows : if they dared to pre insta
Again and again and again. Please define normal daily functions ? For me that means : surfing the web, do some office work, play a game, chat, ... . Modding Windows is not part of my list "normal daily functions". Installing programs is not part if this list neither, as it can be dangerous (virusses, trojan horses, ...). Stardock Central is designed to change programs and settings on my hard drive. Windows by no means can know who initiated those requests (it can ev
And I have moved back from IE7 to firefox 2, even tho I switched to Vista
Because at one moment or another we will see 64 bit applications appear ? Because I have a 64bit Intel processor, and want to use it to it's full capacity ? Or maybe just because I like to brag At one point of time I made the mistake of not buying a 32 bit processor, but choose for the "faster "16 bits. That was, until the 32 bit applications began to pop up. Especially when playing games, it w
"Why the f*** does it have to prompt me when I go into display properties?" I just checked it for you, it does not prompt me. Right clicked on the desktop, and went right in. No UAC bugging me. I double checked, yes I have UAC activated. So I made a second, standard user to be sure. Only got prompted when I wanted to check if UAC was activated - while logged in as this new user- to enter my password. Which is expected, because I could deactivate UAC from here. I really don'
Rabidrobot, thanks for this instructive article. Unix users are for years used to the Administrator (or Super User) concept. People have been bashing Microsoft because Windows was so vulnerable to viruses and, more important, users. Finally they come up with something that has been proved in the industry times and times again, and they get accused of delivering a broken piece of software ? I really don't get it. As you stated, most users will only rarely be confronted with th
I vote against such practices. This is nothing different as the super user account in a NIX environment. Every program that has acces to system files and has the intention to change something, like the majority of Stardock programs, should first ask permission from the user. I turned this back on, and unless you want to change something on the system, this UAC thing does not pop-up : it does not pop up when performing work (Word, Excel, ...), it does not pop up when accessing the in
Just bought it to see if it exceeds my expectations. it is still downloading ... Brad, what most people put off, me too when I first saw the prize tag, is the fact that in all communication towards the public MS and Stardock came forward as one team. I read somewhere that Microsoft contacted Stardock to help them to create first class content. In this light, most people expect you getting paid by Microsoft to do this. Especially as this dream in particular was showed off by Micro
and with that, Hawk999, I have to agree . People are afraid, afraid to lose their jobs and the good life they have. They are afraid of immigrants, of mondialization, of worldscale polution. And they blame industry and the market place for that. Can you blame them ? They hear about it on the news daily. And so they turn to the state to protect them against blind kapitalism. But I am sure there is a narrow path between what you call cultural Marxism and kaptitalism. J
Well, then I am happy the "elite" like you state is, is so big in Europe. I am from Belgium, and I can tell you that here, everybody can go to the university, and if you can not pay for it, the state will help you financially to do it. The only limit is your will to succeed. In the US everybody can go to the University ? If you or your parents can pay for it, yes. And where is the difference with the Grandes Ecoles in France ? Harvard, Princeton and Yale are examples that spring to mind.
The European system of education and government greatly inhibits your ability to develop products the world really wants. hum. may I point out that, as someone mentioned above, the ipod was developed by an englishman ? may I point out that, if Boeing surpassed Airbus last year, that means that Airbus had the market before ? the co
this is interesting, but there are things I can immediately think of that lack. First of all, currently every normal person has everything organized in folders. It would be awesome if you could put a link to a folder on that 3D space and that it creates automatically a pile. Also subfolder could be accesible like a book (flip through its contents). Someone else already mentioned the lack of labels. Another suggestion : your running