I don't consider that Bible a history book.. well I do but to an extent. The old testament is basically a history book. And the new testament are the records of Jesus's life. So yes, it is a history book in the least. Umm... Jehovah's Witness... that's a christian cult.... it's pseudo-chrisitian. I can get them frustrated, too.
Capt Cornbread: I'm a computer engineer but also have my masters in electrical engineering--cuz it's not that much more effort-- And your very welcome. threead: Was that question asking what evidence did the designer --God-- leave behind? ... um... the universe. And the whole thing about the Nazi stuff. Yes. agreed. It's dissapointing. ><
I'm also posting the Teleological Argument: The teleological argument is also known as the argument from design. Quite simply, it states that a designer must exist since the universe and living things exhibit marks of design in their order, consistency, unity, and pattern. A typical analogy of this is the Watchmaker which was given by William Paley (1743-1805). The argument goes as follows. If you found a watch in an empty fie
The Bible was inspired by God; therefore true. If you believe that the bible is completely fictious then your wrong, as JillUser said. You can at least see it as a history book. I can probably defend Chrsitianity a little better than cpt. cornbread did. And the whole fairy tale thing is ther cuz i don't understand how things around me work or cuz i'm poor and low class.... well no. I'm actually an engineer who believe a lot in science and middle cl
JoeUser Forums