Hypothesis: The above is 100% true. Effect: None.
BulbousHead
Again, the exception of one group vs. the rule of another, they are different. Translation: "I refuse to address the question you pose." Representative government is
It's possible to believe in God (and therefore not be an "atheist" or an "agnostic") but not consider yourself religious, so I consider the first question poorly worded. I'm also not sure what it means to support or not support the "War on Terror." I support many facets of it but hate others.
So Bush rushes into the wrong things and waits for all the wrong things, and Kerry just flip flops on everything to appeal to as many groups as he can. Lesser of those two evils: Kerry
I don't entertain the argument because I find it rediculous. Then consider exactly two couples, a pair of 25-year-old homosexual men, and a man and a woman, both 75 years old. They are equally unable to have children. Why can the latter marry and the forme
I just highlight the quotation in the original poster's reply, and then I click the 'Q' button. Yes, but what code do to mark what is in <TABL
Perhaps you should relook then. Congress gave Bush authorization to conduct the war on terror. The Iraq action, btw, also had congressional approval. So does renaming post offices in Wisconsin, but that doesn't make it a war. <TABLE cellpadding=8 width="95%" align=center bgColor=#FFF394 cl
Boulbous, are you essentially admitting that you are against Bush's environmental policies even though you don't actually know what they are? I didn't say that. I didn't say I was against anything. aconservative asked how they affect me. Since I live in the environment, Bush's policies are relevant t
Steve- How are you getting the quotes to work correctly? Omnipotence! I don't put any HTML in; I just type like in a word processor. That seems to allow the site to "sense" the quotefulness.
Didn't I just state that intelligent discussion on such issues must be in the realm of generalizations to be held as realistic by those that actually are looking to be informed. Comparing all homosexuals to the exceptions of heterosexuals is laughable. Not when your objections are very specific. You ob
the environment, energy and national service have affected you. I live in the environment. I use energy. I don't know what you mean by "national service." What's h
No, we're not supposed to dismiss them as silly Aw, c'mon, Bobby. Freedom Fries? The Administration wanted us thinking that France and Germany were completely irrelevant. In light of this, the coalition doesn't impress me. <TABLE cellpadding=8 width="95%" align=center bgColor=#FFF394 cl
Nope. Actually I already said that I did think it would be just as negative. If you mean "the reaction of the media machinery of the anti-Bush forces," then perhaps you are right. But if you mean "the reaction of the average American who was offended," use some common sense. jeblackstar and I are oppo
I do apologize; it's Brad's job to accuse every liberal of wanting to attack Bush for anything at all. Meanwhile, you did ask whether the reaction would be less negative. I think you have to admit that the reaction would be less negative if the ad were just words on a screen telling us that September 11 was bad. Also, it's "bated" breath, not "baited."
Here is a list of the countries that participated in liberating Iraq That's all well and good, but this "list of countries" is frequently used by the Administration to further their hypocrisy. While one side of their mouths is telling us that France-and-Germany-can-go-to-hell-because-who-cares-what-the
jeblackstar : You really think that reaction would have been less negative had Bush used words instead of images? I think this would have happened regardless of the format. IMHO, the Bush opposition was waiting for any reference to 9/11 in his campaign with baited breath. I disagree entirely. The whole
The point was more that their lack of ability to procreate goes agianst basic survival of the species and is therefore a logical and common sense reason to assume that it is unnatural. Should incurably sterile couples be allowed to marry? What about elderly couples? <TABLE cellpadding=8 w
FDR had a pin in his reelection that said "I remember Pearl Harbor". So I guess the Democrats can use Pearl Harbor for their reelection but Bush can't use 9/11 for his reelection? Typical liberal double standard don't you think? FDR did not have a pin with a picture of Pearl Harbor being blown to bits.
This is the word of our God. Nobody loves me.
There is also: 4. The Bible is NOT a nice story and should be largely disregarded as a guideline for anything.
It gets to a point where you don't even have to look at their posts to know what's inside them. The title says it all. When the whole board seems to be covered with this kind of stuff, it gets depressing. And sickening. There... are you happy? Solution: Stop coming to JoeUser.
Of course you don't have to keep fast on St. Patrick's Day. It is after all the feast of St. Patrick... Plus it's best not to drink on an empty stomach.
Name one instances whereby Bush policies on the environment, energy and national service had affected you personally. You sound more stupid by the day. I'm beginning truly to believe that you're a twelve-year-old.
In america the Declaration was signed by all the different extremists groups No, in the US, the Declaration was signed by a bunch of rich white guys with a common goal, financial freedom from English taxes.
It's pretty depressing seeing their posts and the negativity they produce Solution: Stop reading their blogs .