Like I said, taste doesn't enter into it. How about an ad supporting gay marriage, showing two men having anal sex, with the caption, "Is this really hurting you?" A
BulbousHead
Hrm, haven't seen any changes suggested that would replace representative government. If you don't like what your legislators do, vote them out and they can make new laws. That's the plan. <TD cla
Done, old boy, done.
I nominate the following: 1. Best Overall Original Blogger - Sir Peter Maxwell 4. Best Newcomer - Sir Peter Maxwell 6. Most Sensible Blogger - Sir Peter Maxwell 8. Most Sensuous Blogger - Sir Peter Maxwell 9. Most Interesting Blogger - Sir Peter Maxwell 11. Blogger Most Likely to Succeed - Sir Peter Maxwell 14. Best and Favorite Overall Blogger - Sir Peter Maxwell
I don't see tastefulness entering into it, honestly. Thanks for not answering the question. I specifically asked you not to address the politics of my hypothetical (since it is obvious that Bush could not have prevented the attacks) but only the tastefulness. <TABLE cellpadding=8 width="9
Alive, with the ability to further adjust things until they are just right. If you lose enough civil liberties, you lose the ability to further adjust things. The De
Tell me, then, would you have any objection to the tastefulness (as opposed to the politics) of an ad that features a video of the collapse of the Towers, followed by a voiceover: "This happened while Bush was President"? As far as "annihilated national landmark", he is reminding people what all the hubbub has been
the democrats would have lambasted him for using the military as advertising, or would have screamed that he shouldn't capitalize on civilian casualites You're grasping at straws. Showing images of the destroyed World Trade Center has NOTHING to do with any of Bush's accomplishments. If you disagree,
As the writer of this article, I am very irritated with some of your comments. Awwwww, poor baby. I took pains to write it as compassionately as I could. <
How about Social Security? Let's hear your scathing diatribe against this most socialist of programs. Let's hear one from any Republican.
Can there be any doubt that sodomy is a very unnatural type of behavior and that it only brings all kinds of diseases and harm to those who engage in it. Smoking is a very unnatural type of behavior that only brings all kinds of diseases and harm to those who engage in it AND the people around them. Bu
We've ALL done something like that I have never done this once. Is Ken Lay still in this country after today's verdict? Ken Lay is a frien
So, BulbousHead, what are you doing with your tax return? Hm?
The jokes you see about Bush on the Tonight Show and SNL might be funny, but they are rarely based in fact. http://slate.msn.com/id/76886/ Conservatives in the 20th
I would think that after 2 or 3 years the mourning process would be over and done with. Maybe you're wrong. Did you ever lose a family member? A child or a spouse? <TD class="mb-Body-Quote-Text"
And yet, the polls show him neck-and-neck with the President. So...we'll see!
Would you care to explain to me, quite clearly, how the human race came into existence, how the earth was formed? Or haven't you spent enough time, had enough patience, and put enough thought and effort into it to know? I didn't say that I know everything or that the human race collectively knows everyt
Leaving things broken isn't a viable option in terms of national security. If maintaining civil liberties means leaving things broken, then broken let them be. What did Franklin say about liberty and safety...?
I'm gonna harden my heart...I'm gonna swallow my tears...
I think that he is okay as long as he sticks to images of himself or his actions. Simply displaying images of the attacks or of the ensuing destruction says nothing about Bush and is therefore necessarily irrelevant and unacceptable.
But he certainly should use images pointing out what HE did as President I agree completely; he has every right to recall his handling of the situation. My only objection is the wanton use of any old image of the destruction just to stir up bad memories. Showing the collapse of the towers (just as an
Since I have yet to post a single blog entry, all my points are based on my (ultra-enjoyable) comments in the Forums. That somehow doesn't seem equitable (unless the points are somehow redeemable for cash, in which this system is perfect).
You are angry because you decided to be angry Ludicrous. No one has 100% control over his or her every emotional response. The rest was a semi-coherent, completely tangential rant on which I decline to comment...
I have no problem with President Bush using September 11 images of himself or of things that he did . How does seeing the debris of the fallen towers communicate anything about Bush? You want to show him at Ground Zero, you want to show him talking to the firefighters, you want to show him meeting with Giuliani, whatever, that's all fine. But just to throw a picture of the destruction itself on the screen is a bit much [michael moore]unless Bu