shadesofgrey

Reply to The Second Annual Joeuser poll in Blogging JoeUser Forums

Bunch of fucking assholes... But I voted for you.

Reply to From Now On in Blogging JoeUser Forums

hahaha! Nice one. (You're not getting anything outta me, though!) But you'll send me the answer in my christmas card, right?

Reply to The Second Annual Joeuser poll in Blogging JoeUser Forums

Anyway, all you assholes better vote for me as the meanest blogger or I shall kick your virtual asses (with my steel-toed velvet slippers) for the entire new year. Can I change my vote? I vote for LW!! (LW--isn't that voter intimidation? I'm calling the JU Board of Elections!)

Reply to Little Miss Isabella in Blogging JoeUser Forums

Congrats Tex. Sorry I'm late to the party here. She is quite precious--I can't wait to read blogs about her antics. I'm sorry to hear that Adrian had to go back so quickly after the birth--what a bummer!

Reply to Gwyneth Paltrow, English are more Intelligent than Americans in Entertainment JoeUser Forums

Nice San Chonino, nice!

Reply to Gwyneth Paltrow, English are more Intelligent than Americans in Entertainment JoeUser Forums

And nicer asses. really? Suppose I haven't thought of it, but I've definitely seen some hot european ass, too! (just about the entire Portugal and Italian World Cup teams come to mind!) But if you were talking just about British ass--I'll just su

Reply to The Second Annual Joeuser poll in Blogging JoeUser Forums

never mind. i fixed it.

Reply to The Second Annual Joeuser poll in Blogging JoeUser Forums

double post

Reply to The Second Annual Joeuser poll in Blogging JoeUser Forums

For some reason it hasn't been letting me post. MM wonders how long I can be sweet and kind to meg before she pukes. Who says I haven't already? Ok--my votes: Meanest Blogger: Everyone has their moments--but consistently? I'd say Jennifer1 or DrMiler Most disliked Blogger by me: Cutepablo. Ugh!! Most

Reply to The Second Annual Joeuser poll in Blogging JoeUser Forums

Mod: It won't let me post!!! Ugh. I'll try again later--before I forget them all. PS. I've already puked--several times--so there

Reply to The Second Annual Joeuser poll in Blogging JoeUser Forums

Second annual? Pfft... who remembers this? http://gemcityjoe.joeuser.com/index.asp?AID=11676 I distinctly remember being very disappointed that I didn't win on any categories. Oh well I remember that Dan--and your disappointment. I've got t

Reply to Bush continues to give! in US Domestic JoeUser Forums

Uh, excuse me, it takes 51 votes to confirm. He had 58. Dont split hairs here, the democrats filibustered it. Period. They have not had a filibuster proof majority in my living memory. THAT is for the RECORD. Dr Guy--is it possible to have a conversation without you being condescending? I'm not splitting hairs--if Chafee, Voinovi

Reply to Bush continues to give! in US Domestic JoeUser Forums

MM--ah, she wasn't meant to tell! I'm sure anyone else who could have would have done the same. But still, you're free to give me a hard time whenever you'd like! As for the topic at hand--Bolton is appointed through the end of this Congress (so January 2007). There seems to be a misunderstanding of the nomination process--there is no need to filibuster (filabuster sp??) the nomination be

Reply to Spoke too Soon - Whining in Politics JoeUser Forums

MPost: The problem is that 18,000 people in the district appear to have voted in every other race on Nov. 7th, but the Congressional one. This should raise red flags to anyone that there *may* have been a computer malfunction. I'm not saying there was or there wasn't--and because of electronic voting with no paper trail, there is no way to know.

Reply to Bush continues to give! in US Domestic JoeUser Forums

Wrong answer shades! For the record it was the "democrats" filibustering his nomination Most recently, it was Senator Chafee (A REPUBLICAN) who put a hold on the nomination. No one filabustered the nomination because it never made it to the floor. <TABLE cellpadding=8 width="95%" align=center bgColor=#FFF394 class="mb-Body-Quote-Tabl

Reply to Bush continues to give! in US Domestic JoeUser Forums

For the record, Bolton resigned because a REPUBLICAN Senate would NOT confirm him. If the President made another recess appointment, Bolton would have to work for free. It's not just the left that dislikes Bolton. A little research would show that he's caused Secretary Rice a lot of headaches acting on his own instead of representing the policy of the US as formulated by the State Department. Remember, as an Ambassador, he answers to Rice--and she should not be spending her time m

Reply to Gwyneth Paltrow, English are more Intelligent than Americans in Entertainment JoeUser Forums

But I guess Gwyneth likes that - being dull and boring. You're kidding right? I'd imagine that Gwennie has a very unboring life--after all she is married to hottie Coldplay frontman Chris Martin.

Reply to Cheap in America in Current Events JoeUser Forums

PS. I'm also more likely to help those I know (or know of) rather than give to an organization, though I do that too. PPS. Does the study account for time donated? In other words, was it strictly about cash, or did it account for those people who say spend four hours a week in a soup kitchen? Time is often just as valuable to an agency as money.

Reply to Cheap in America in Current Events JoeUser Forums

I heard a segment on the radio with the 20/20 host. I haven't really looked into it, but I do wonder where the source data is from. The previous studies I've seen come from tax returns, which only shows that some people are more likely to ask for the donations to be tax deductible. Personally, I never file my donations on my taxes, and I usually make my donations anonymously (and I'm registered as an independent)--so I guess I'd really just screw up the methodology, eh? Regardless, i

Reply to So Much for Bi-Partisanship in Politics JoeUser Forums

you are allowed to celebrate christmas yes? Why, but of course. Us godless liberals partake fully in the commericalized aspect of the holiday season -- we just ignore that bit about the Savior's birth!

Reply to So Much for Bi-Partisanship in Politics JoeUser Forums

I notice the left refuses to even acknowledge, the exchange MIGHT be impolite. I fully acknowledge that the exchange was impolite. I just happen to think that ther person lacking manners is not the person who you think is lacking manners! Nice to see you back, MM!

Reply to So Much for Bi-Partisanship in Politics JoeUser Forums

How many of the ads did you see/hear? I saw all the ads that Kingbee linked to during the campaign season. Asking about one's children is not cause for a debate. But I guess in new speak it is. That is utter nonse

Reply to So Much for Bi-Partisanship in Politics JoeUser Forums

And please show me ANYWHERE on this site where he lists how many times each one ran? What? What does the number of times aired have to do with what Kingbee said? You said he mentioned "his sons service a part of almost every campaign commercial (except the ones bashing Allen)." You didn't say "in the ads that ran most frequently." Wha

Reply to So Much for Bi-Partisanship in Politics JoeUser Forums

Mistake he was making? Excuse me that etiquette and decorum were also a victim of the last election. I was unaware of the democrats running on a platform to ban it. In polite company you do not bring up topics of conversation that will cause a debate or make the other party feel ill at ease. Webb made an entirely appropriate response to an ent

Reply to So Much for Bi-Partisanship in Politics JoeUser Forums

And continued........Conveniently forgetting the rudeness of his response? What are you talking about Dr.Guy? Your source doesn't continue to discuss Webb's response any further than what Davad said. Bush was completely and totally out of line to ask about his son in "small talk" at this function. Being from the social elite, he sho