/me backs up to the wall.....heh np




[Message Edited]

That guys site is very intriging. I am going to be reading it for a while: http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/PSCINDX.HTM

Thanks Skins Factory for leading me to one of the gems of the internet

the writer of that webpage debunks a lot of movies too. Explains how badly they break scientific laws etc. Good stuff.

Yeah Travis i'm actually good to have around the boards... When i'm around you get some drama/action (see people need to chill thread), you get some interesting web links (see this thread) and you get some sexual inuendo (see any thread i spot china on)

i joined this way too late.. but uh.. wouldn't the earth's magnetic field deflect what energy we sent at it?

it blocks out much of the sun's, afterall.. if you were to send similar radiation back from the moon it would just bounce off and make pretty colors.

bush just wants to get to the moon again so Pepsi can pay him to put a billboard there.

Actually i'm not so sure we did. Explain why the flag was waving/blowing when they shot footage of it on the moon and the moon is zero-gravity? Explain why there was no blast crater where the lunar lander touched down but there was tons of pressure from the engines? Explain why they showed a shot of the astronauts in one place and then shot them in another place that was supposedly 2 miles away and when the photos were superimposed the rocks and hills were exactly the same? Explain the shadow discrepancies between the astronauts, the lunar lander and the position of the sun? Explain how the astronauts survived the trip through radiation belt with little to no radiation protection? Too many unanswered questions to believe so positively.

http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/apollohoax.html

Nuff said. Each point has been refuted.

a link was already given that said the same. In fact a link to the same page is on that page.

And yes TSF your presence makes the boards more interesting...in a good way

I just thought of something: Wouldn't the Moon be a hard place to colonize because it get hit with space rocks and other material very offten?

I just thought of something: Wouldn't the Moon be a hard place to colonize because it get hit with space rocks and other material very offten?

Not anymore. Moon still has craters because there's nothing to make em fade, meanwhile earth has wind, water ( melt/ice cycle is what mostly breaks rocks ) and etc to break craters down.

Armstrong's footprint will be there for millions of years, as long as theres no lunk quake ( very rare ) or rock hits where they landed.

I think the "we did not go to the moon" theorists don't actually believe in their own theory themselves. I believe they are just using it as a subject to sell books. Most "we did not go to the moon" sites I have ever seen to were only ads for books.

you are most probably right Tech Cat.


I am selling a new book entitled "Microsoft is a Extraterrestrial Entity" supporting the theory that Bill Gates is an ugly alien (aren't all aliens ugly? well except for those green chicks from star trek ) and his company is made up of his lunar friends. Visit my site to see more.....
[Message Edited]

Well that's true, isn't it?

Damn....looks like TSF is one of the twits to which I alluded....

They don't make enough tinfoil hats to protect us from all the conspiracy theorists on this planet....

Oh oh......is that a Black Helicopter I hear?.....

Damn....looks like TSF is one of the twits to which I alluded....

What! You never saw 'Capricorn One'?????

Damn....looks like TSF is one of the twits to which I alluded.... They don't make enough tinfoil hats to protect us from all the conspiracy theorists on this planet.... Oh oh......is that a Black Helicopter I hear?.....

cute real cute. Hey at the time it seemed convincing. I was sitting there going: "yeah why is the flag waving in zero-gravity!!"

i learned something interstign the other day, from MSN.. apparently they found out that at least 1, and liekly the first, of the earth's major 5 extinctions (yes, the earth has had up to 75% of all life out at least 5 times) was caused by a star exploading and zapping the earth with a ray of ultraviolet radiation. just zapped.. wiped out the ozane layer, crisped everything on the planet, then covered the world in a thick brown smog.

and they said its likely to happen every few hundred million years they said "it could be tomorrow, or hundreds of millions of years from now..." but it can be expected again.

kinda reminds me of the Matrix.. where the architect tells neo the matrix is in its 6th phase. we're in our 6th phase.

from MSN.. apparently they found out that at least 1, and liekly the first, of the earth's major 5 extinctions (yes, the earth has had up to 75% of all life out at least 5 times) was caused by a star exploading

must have upgraded to SP1 which caused extinction in 50% of all XP OS's it was applied too Damn MS has been around a long time

There's the proof! I knew MSN was evil...

hey all-knowing all-seeing Jafo: how do i get my master apprentice user class to show?

TSF....sorry, but you can't....you aren't one....

i learned something interstign the other day, from MSN.. apparently they found out that at least 1, and liekly the first, of the earth's major 5 extinctions (yes, the earth has had up to 75% of all life out at least 5 times)

That is a matter of opinion. I personaaly believe the earth is less than 10,000 years old and was created so...it really is a opinion thing.

Please no debates here about creation or whatnot.
[Message Edited]

TSF....sorry, but you can't....you aren't one....

I wonder why...that's a no brainer.

actually i am. Unless i got bumped down.

um. have you checked your profile lately tsf?

why?