polyandry is specifically one woman with multiple husbands so she has several men who sit around and watch sports, won't give up the remote and refuse to ask for directions? lol
excellent post!!!! i have the same disease...maybe it's a burgh thing? lol i printed this and gave it to the wife,,,she'll be glad there's finally a diagnosis as well, lol an insightful bump is in order as well.
Today, it was reported that a "tearful" Dennis Nifong will resign as DA. It's about time. Months ago, when ethics charges were finally formally brought onto Nifong, I wrote how maybe justice might be finally on it's way to being done in this case. Today's resignation, combined with stirring testimony from one of Nifong's victims, were a step in that direction. <B
rowan tree here...hmmmm.
I will ask you this straight up, Sean: do you support the same rights for polygamy or polyandry? Assuming that ONLY consenting adults are part of the relationship? IF not, Why not? honestly gid, i probably don't know enough about all of those types of relationships to make a call one way or another. but i certainly would hear their side of the equation and see if it applies to what i believe is constitutionally protected. maybe since those typ
Assuming there isn't military bias against it, even in nations that allow it, is irresponsible. But, then, so is using a man from 200 years ago as a hand puppet to promote one's own morality... just the fact that you consider homosexuality a "morality" is why we can't talk about this. it has nothing to do with morality. being gay is not a choice. and the only people who do think it's a choice are quite frankly, morons on this issue. and i don't kno
You guys are straining hard, lol. It would be perfectly resonable to allow those born here citizenship until they prove unworthy of the title American. ladies and gentleman,,,put your hands together for the thought police!
Hey SC...if you're going to talk about America, do it right. America is a representative republic not a democracy. SC, I apologize. It would seem that what I was taught in school is now considered incorrect. From Wikipedia: i'm not sure what your point is, but thanks for the input. it is true we get caught up in all these terms when talking about our government, our society and whatnot. it can get conf
P.S. You might also want to take into consideration that Washington was a military leader, as well. It might put a different spin on what attitudes he might have. I don't think you can for any reason assume he would have opposed a ban on gay marriage. Nothing you have there seems to lead to that conclusion none of our allies in europe have any ban on open homosexual people in the military. assuming all military are against it is false. as barry
not by what some judge decides by himself in his chamber somewhere. if the judge is following the constitution and honestly (notice i didn't subscribe to any particular ideology there) interprets the law as they are sworn to do, then there is no problem. you are combining issues and assuming the judge is going to simply "do what he feels like." the judge represents the people as he is the arbitrator, mediator and interpreter of our co
Does his website show how he manipulated clips to make people look like they were saying something different too? How about the other the "facts" that have been shown to be false and manipulated by Moore? i dunno, why don't you ask him. i'm not defending his total accuracy...just that he defends his claims. this talk of "caving" and such are just more right wing spun up bs. his documentaries are entertaining, but that doesn't mean he
It was meant to protect both the the religious and the athiest, neither is greater than the other by means literal or implied by the constitution. i can agree with that statement.
YOu cant choose your family. ONly your friends. well put guy
we were set up as a majority rules country there's a lot more to it than that according to our constitution So do I get special protected status for my preferred sexual positions, too? i said nothing about a protected status. i just support giving equal status to same sex couples. and i defend your right to f*ck in any position you like without interference of the government. <img src="http://images.sta
I'm a liberal, the next day I'm neocon i don't believe i have ever called you a liberal. show me where i have done that. Fahrenheit 9/11 was challenged on so many factual errors that even Moore finally caved and referred to himself as an entertainer, not a documentarian oh really? then why does moore have a 7 section line by line fact check on his site for the movie? here's the first few tidbi
Treating gay rights as a civil rights issue is essentially spitting in the face of every minority in this country, Sean. i absolutely disagree with that. every american citizen deserves the same rights regardless of their personal beliefs. limiting civil rights only to a race thing might serve you well. but it applies to a whole host of personal decisions. It is pretty hard to call a vote on a State amendment a "
guess you are at stage 2 of ghandi's formula.... 1st they ignore you then they laugh at you then they fight you then you win
ya got iran and korea in your gulf too gid, lol...but at least canada has never been so balmy!
blah, blah, blah,,,same ol rhetoric ...anyone who won't damn anyone who disagrees with the far right wing nut jobs is a "left wing loon" what a joke!
Last night, Texas Representative and Presidential candidate Ron Paul brought his "Constitutionalist" message to the Colbert Nation. Here's the showdown... <embed FlashVars='config=http://www.comedycentral.com/motherload/xml/data_synd.jhtml?vid=88505%26myspace=false' src='http://www.comedycentral.com/motherload/syndicated_player/index.jhtml' quality='high' bgc
Marriage should not be a government institution ultimately, i think i would have no problem with that.
Moore is known for propaganda films, and is one of most partisan propaganda film makers out there, so no I won't give him the benefit of the doubt. only with the neocons and far right. to the rest of us, he is a documentarian. an academy award winning documentarian. that's not to say that everything he has ever contended has been dead on balls accurate. but just because you disagree with his premises or points of view does not make him a propogandist.
I find it kinda funny that you picked my comment to say something about it when it was Baker all along who has been pointing this idea out. sorry charles, it wasn't personal. i disagree with anyone who wants to start stripping citizenship because of their deeds being deemed unworthy by anyone. i disagree with criminals losing their voting rights after they have paid their price. if they truly pay the price, the right should be restored. it is j
oh, come on now, please i am now out of ideas i can't even finish this with a verse containing 5 syllables unless you count the fact that i had "5 syllables" in the text of this last sentence.
JoeUser Forums