LMFAO!!!! touche!
Sean Conners aka SConn1
A lot of rhetoric gets spent in the political arena over our founding fathers and their intent in regards to our religious status as a nation. Many on the right contend that we are somehow a "christian" nation. Others, trying to seem more inclusive, call it a "judeo-christian" nation. But fact is, we're not. I've written in the past on this subject
About 5 minutes ago, my son called me from my desk. He was yelling from our pool out back, "daddy, daddy, look at those 2 planes up there!" When I got out there, I looked up and saw 2 big jets. I'm guessin coming out of Philadelphia International. Could have been BWI or lil ol New Castle's airport, but i'm thinkin Philly, based on the direction and all. The
Not all Hispanics are mexican. Not all Mexicans are illegals. And not all illegals are Mexican or hispanic. i know that guy...but look anywhere this is being discussed. it is all about the "mexicans." some are at least courteous enough to use a more generic term like "latino." and immigration was never a problem when it was europeans comin thru canada cause they couldn't get into ellis. in fact, reagan increased the number of irish immigrants we
Thank you for using foofaraw in a sentence. yeah... i gotta hand it to ya there too guy...definitely the "word of the day" winner.
Then apparently you do not understand what is written, or have not read what I wrote. oh, but i do.
I can't speak for Charles, but for myself: I voted for McCain in 2000. mccain...who's for the immigration bill as well? And on dec 9th of 1999, the candidate (bush) said this... I believe it is far more compassionate to turn away people at the border than to attempt to find and arrest them once they are living in our country illegally. And before the people re-elected him again in 2004, his stance had not changed...from january
This is pandering to the highest degree. They want so desperately to make these illegal immigrants into good registered Democrats that they will use any and all wordplay to justify their position. ya'll didn't mind when it was george pandering for them... Monday, Jun. 19, 2000 By JAMES CARNEY AND JOHN F. DICKERSON/WASHINGTON George Bush--all three generations of him--wants to woo Hispanic voters. Scarcely a week goes by when the Texas
puhleassseee..yer graspin at straws. the point exists and is clear. the smokescreen is from the right on this, lol.
why didn't you comment on that when bush said it in 2000? too busy trashing al gore to notice? Jun 26, 2000.... Immigration is not a problem to be solved, it is the sign of a successful nation. New Americans are to be welcomed as neighbors and not to be feared as strangers.
my apologies...this will be my last post / read of your stuff. i thought maybe ya "woke up grumpy" again..guess not. have a nice day, and i wish only the best to you and yours.
No, as I clearly stated, why get upset over a proposed law that has no chance? the GOP, when it was closer to the "party of principle" that it advertised, would never take that posture. the conservative does not support things just based on their popularity. on abortion, the right has dug in it's stance and refused to compromise because of "moral objections." on gay marriage, they oppose it on "moral grounds." on this issue,
Good point ParaTed that's why i asked him for some input here. i know it's a subject he has spoken on before. thanks ted.
Something about whistle-blowing and whatnot... sometimes the 4th estate is the only refuge a whistleblower has is how i would interpret that.
No, you walk away smiling because you've lost it. Crazy people do that. Our opinions may be equally valid, overall, but at least there's caution in mine that's cheney's "1 % doctrine." it's not the probablility of the threat that matters, that can be 1 percent. it's our response to that perceived threat that matters. As for 100 million Muslims, if that many were truly violent, we'd be dead. As I said, if one percent o
why conservatives were not that concerned. We knew that this crap would not fly through so, it wasn't a principle...it was pure political posturing. lol
The America First Committee was the foremost pressure group against American entry into the Second World War. AFC was established September, 4, 1940 by Yale law student R. Douglas Stuart, Jr., along with other students including future President Gerald Ford , Sargent Shriver and future Supreme Court justice Potter Stewart . At its peak, America First may have had 800,000 members in 650 chapters, located mostly in a 300 mile radius of Chicago. It claimed 135,000 members in 60
This bill stands no chance of passing, the "groundswell" of public outcry is impossible for Congress to ignore. from the conservative think tank, the manhattan institute's poll (done by the republican pollsters "terrance group") in october 2005 of likey REPUBLICAN voters... WWW Link “In examining this data, it is clear that likely Republican voters strongly
oh, so since you can name one where the Republicans voted by party lines, you say that is conclusive? no, i'm not ted. just an example. can you show some examples of your side? i'm not tryin to be a smart ass, but my point is that many of these republicans are now claiming such vast independence from the president and trying to distance themselves like they haven't been in lock step, on the whole, with the president. they act like they were against all
i disagree with your absurd analogy, but it's your dime daiwa,,,thanks for the comments:)
all the other times Conservatives disagreed with Prs. Bush, they always said, "I support him, I just don't agree with him here". i never really heard that before this issue. when the issue was the medicare drug program, a costly, "liberal" piece of fatty pork, the republicans almost wholly went down the party line.. Grouped By Vote Position YEAs ---54 Alexander (R-TN) Allard (R-CO) Allen (R-VA) Baucus (D-MT) Bennett (R-UT)<
for example, i was watching an interview with an ohio official this morning on one of the "24's" who was billing the govt. for every illegal he had to jail. something that few in the current climate would be vocal against. but then he added that he bills mexico somehow in relation to the marijuana he seizes as well. someone needs to educate this guy on where that pot is coming from. i happened to put myself thru school in large part to doing a lot of business with ohio farmers who were
It was not meant to be a statement of belief or fact on either his or my part. i'm sorry...i wasn't trying to infer that at all. those comments were directed at no one specific. i do believe that much of this debate is a racist one in many people's hearts. one that is easily denied with plenty of cover. but again, they weren't directed at anyone specific. i probably over reached by saying "whole debate."
well...paulie survived...and NOTHING happened in the end. count me amongst the majority who thought the ending was frustrating / dissapointing. some talk of a movie, like above,,,we'll see...
I always tell folks that Christian is a verb i like that