Petty & nitpicky, the Right is, huh? And the article's not? if you think sex with 8 and 10 year old girls is that, then sure.
Sean Conners aka SConn1
1: All illegals are Latino, and - 2: All latinos are illegal. that is the underlying racism in this whole debate on immigration. it's easy to pick on them, cause they can't really defend themselves on any equal footing. and anyone who stands up for them will instantly be painted as "anti-american" or some sim. charge. and it's also equally as easy to deny the racism charge and claim a host of other things as the reason. and it's unfortunate th
how do you dry up a job that has to be done to make everyone happy. do you close mcdonalds, burger king, or stop building new houses, which jobs do you want to dry up ugh...i'm not saying eliminate the jobs. i'm saying actually enforce the laws and go after the employers who prey on illegals. the swift plant raids out west are a good example. after INS swept the places, the next day, there were more than enough qualified, documented ap
Mitt Romney. well, if we're gona go there...how bout Rudy Giuliani? "most conservative" mayor of NYC ? that's like being the thinnest kid at fat camp.
You see a list of Bronze star and purple heart winners and all you can say is... "there was a draft" for shame sean. no, i'm saying the eras aren't as parallel as you are painting them and a lot of other factors play into that. simply put, all factors aren't even close to being equal, so the comparison is invalid. that doesn't diminish the service of the folks you mentioned, but the context is important if a comparisson is going to be made. you also igno
for Sean oh, the obsession continues...
See the trailer for the movie that Fox news says... 'Sicko' Shows Michael Moore's Maturity as a Filmmaker Sunday , May 20, 2007 By Roger Friedman Filmmaker Michael Moore's brilliant and uplifting new documentary, "Sicko," deals with the failings of the U.S. healthcare system, both real and perceived. But this time around, the cont
sorry mm,,,with few exceptions, most of those were drafted. if there was a draft today, there would be a much different roster in the army. not to mention, ya see any of the army ads today? no "uncle sam wants you" ads that directly called on people to fight the axis. today, we still get the same ads that we got in peacetime that talk about getting money for college and gaining experience for your career. things a wealthy actor really doesn't need. an
how about you start when they find 90,000 in "COLD" hahahahah cash in his freezer.. Personally I come down on lawbreakers from either party. maybe in this case..but who's to say he wasn't framed or someone didn't make that up? i'm not saying he was, and in his case, like you, i don't need a court to convince me that he was up to no good. but MM, another question,,,is the "breaking of the law" the ONLY standard that we judge by? aside from that,
And the MAFIA? What, fighting for Christ hahahahahahahahahahahah! oh my, what a piss-poor analogy. show me a catholic church that doesn't take their money. where 's the outrage? it doesn't exist. eric rudolph survived for years in the carolina hills. the most "outrage " anyone ever showed was 1 general store clerk who simply refused to serve him. he didn't turn rudolph in or report it tho. and only revealed it after rudolph's capture. <br
Tries to write Haiku no ideas coming to mind I think I give up
and this is the reason i am so against the democrats they want to remove all rights except for themselves. lets take that crap at the beginning of the year with rosy and Donald she called him a pimp, which means she called the girls ---------- where was your uproar over that this is exactly what i am talking about dan....it is obvious you can't even get a handle on the don v rosie feud, lol. she called him a pimp meaning that
Immigration has become the neocon battle-cry...a way to appear "independent" after 6+ years of walking in lock step and being a rubber stamp. It's not like this is some new stance by the president. Before the 2000 election, then candidate Bush said this.... From a Speech in Washington, D.C. Jun 26, 2000... Latinos come to the US to seek the sa
oh, and btw,,,miler and the rest of the neocon pundits didn't say a word about immigration until after the 2004 election. i believe miler's first entry into the battle was "conveniently" at the same time the other pundits started showing their feigned "independence" in january of 2005.
Then you really don't pay attention to what I do write. Because I have slammed the republicans too. "Especially" over the dumb-assed immigration bill. And yes that includes Bush with the rest of the dumb-asses. this has become the neocon battle-cry...a way to appear "independent" after 6+ years of walking in lock step and being a rubber stamp. it's not like this is some new stance by the president. before the 2000 election, then candidate bush sa
Ted {I Killed a woman and got away clean} Kennedy is always a good choice. remember this when ya'll are gettin all mad cause someone is trashing a republican who hasn't even been indicited on a charge. and i only make that point to show that everyone is equally as guilty when it comes to throwing bombs based on a public opinion court. whether or not kennedy did anything is irrelevant. the point is that both sides conveniently raise and lower th
how bout bill jefferson..the king of "cold, hard cash."
and i've had my share of cranky wake-ups, so i can definitely relate, lol
we are all americans first, then dems, reps, libs, so on and so on. preach on!
the whole point is that he wanted to shut someone up who didn't agree with him no dan,,,i simply requested that you stick to a subject and not repeat moronic crap over and over. and you were never threatended in any way. you made that up when i asked you to try to not be an idiot in much more diplomatic language than i'm using here. the fact is it is more annoying to put up with your lack of grasp of the english language than anything you have to say. t
rant on brother...speak that truth to power....at least till they kick ya off for a TOU violation that are ignored when someone is spewing the neocon creed or just brown-nosed enough to be included in the ju inner circle.
I read it, it was well after I posted mine. i never said it wasn't. but honestly, i didn't read yours till after it was posted. actually, it sat up on a screen for a couple hours after i read gid's, guy's loca's and rightwinger's "the war as i see it" post that started all this. it sat up in a minimized window on my tool bar while i got some business done and did some other things on line. but that really doesn't matter. cause i was agreeing w