the first post of yours is a RESPONSE to my post in the morning (the one that you rushed and deleted minutes after i posted it) the 2nd, you claim "you haven't seen me all day" which is an intentional lie because you replied to me not 1 hour before. you are a liar, again. and one that can't shut her lying mouth, now adding lies upon lies. keep diggin whip...
Sean Conners aka SConn1
Hmmmm, none of these predatory tactics will stop me from NOT SIGNING THE CONTRACT failure to return deposits; failure to return a customer's own vehicle; these 2 are tactics use to force that signature. by delaying the deposit or the vehicle's return, the sales staff and management can use the time to further manipulate the customer. misrepresentations of a consumer's right not to go forward with a purchase; i think
from the thread i can't even fairly post on... For the record, Sean, don't you EVER pretend to speak for me again. My question to Tex was asked, and answered to my satisfation. You want to start declaring jihad on people on this blog site, do it without me. K? Gid. i wasn't speaking for you for one moment. i did agree with your position as i stated, that's it. get off your high f*ckin horse pal. i have not done 1 goddamn thing to yo
'Reporting' outright lies is not bias. It's lying yep lil girl, it is. and you have proven yourself to be just that. (Citizen)little-whipMarch 29, 2007 11:08:57 btw, Sean, since you've seen fit to delete my posts on your threads, expect the same treatment here. In other words, don't bother. Just go write another long sob story about how badly misunderstood you are, how unfair JU Admin is, a
Cancer is not a political football, and I think some (not here at JU) on both sides of the aisle are trying to use both Snow and Edwards in that regard. i'm sure a few have, but fortunately i haven't seen much of it boil to the surface. this is one case where i think at least many can agree that the "MSM" has actually served as a pretty good "filter" in these cases by not giving the yahoos a bigger stage by ignoring the "cancerous rema
We have heard the stories of babies being abandoned in dumpsters, on doorsteps and other places. When these events happen, like they did here in Delaware a few years back when 2 University of delaware students conspired to have a baby in a cheap, interstate motel room and then simply "throw it away," emotions always run high. Emotions ran high around here.
the following is a hilarious comedy routine by the President. it is as funny as any daily show I have ever seen. It's nice to see the President can still poke fun at himself. enjoy! <!-- Ju-A
by the way, i never got to thank grey for his comments here. much appreciated:)
and now i've had to delete the same vile comments a 4th time from the liar.
(Citizen)little-whipMarch 29, 2007 11:08:57 btw, Sean, since you've seen fit to delete my posts on your threads, expect the same treatment here. In other words, don't bother. Just go write another long sob story about how badly misunderstood you are, how unfair JU Admin is, and what meanies me and my 'cronies' are. but on Tex's thread she says this... little-whipMarch 29, 2007 11:51:49 I wonde
my comments and instructions to amicably discuss that matter can be found here... Link
and i have been forced to delete the same vile comments for a 3rd time
i have now deleted your vile and feeble comments again whip. you have now clearly and braggingly admitted that your sole purpose is to harrass me, a clear TOS violation. i have not responded since stardock asked me not to yesterday. you have shown your inability to show anything mutual in your continued stalking both here and on tex's post. some people are just too eager to prove the points i made in the article,,,surprises me even sometimes,
a big salute to you soldier! we will be waiting and praying for your safe return. thank you for your service.
No one cares what your dad does. In my experience, often the most uninformed, naive people are children of successful parents. Saying your dad was a success doesn't suddenly, as if by magic, endow you with knowledge of how the real world works. i know ya don't care. and i'm not asking ya to. what it does show is that i haven't just been around the rich for just a few years, but my whole life. that was the only real point there. and you a
must have miss George Will commenting in this discussion. ya know brad, you are 100% correct there. my error. actually, guy and i have been discussing the same topic on another thread where i referenced an article talking about that. and if ya look back into the responses in the 40's back there i believe (i'm guessin and don't feel like jumping back and forth anymore), guy and i got into some back and forth discussion on this thread,
as was i truly,,,thanks for the comments:) and staying out of politics is probably the smarter option, lol...take care:)
Hillary clearly stated she wants some sort of universal health care if she's elected. Now you can nitpick the details all you want but she clearly stated it. she also clearly stated that there is a difference between universal care and "nationalized care." the latter is how everyone who hates her defines it, ignoring what she has said and sticking withtheir "1/2 truth." With that we can go back to the discussion tha
gid, i know what you are saying and the definition you cite, but i have never seen an example of anyone in any nation being jailed for not buying into a health care plan. if i am wrong, and there are those "political refugees" out there. therefore i don't think the definition is accurate. tho it does make for good rhetoric. Sean. As Libertarians, it does not serve the party well if we rely too heavily on "talking points" from the big two, as you are doing
Well, the writing is on the wall as they say LH, there are people out there who ARE too stupid to do the right thing and read the fine print and do the other stuff that they're supposed to do to cover there asses! That's the point! you ignore and diminish how much a salesperson can manipulate them. it's not all about the contract and ignoring the rest of course will bring you to that conclusion, but unfortunately, there's more to it.
i've made my point on your blog tex, and i assure you, unless you or your lil cronies start more bs with me... i have no problem steerin clear of your blog well, i guess whip couldn't "respect" that. but that's no surprise, as she is incapable of any genuine respect anyway. i guess i shouldn't expect more from an out of work telemarketer sub. Tex, write to Karma about Seans refusal to honor your request and stay the hell off your blog. Admins
Remember this, Sean, you can spray perfume on a turd all day long, that doesn't make it smell like roses, just a turd with perfume. seems like you are speaking from experience. enjoy your perfume! umm, whip i am deleting your post as it has nothing to do with this. if you want to fight tex's position, go to her thread and i've had enough of your hi-jacking tactics and other b.s. ...buh-bye!
I've practiced in the equivalent of a single-payer system with a captive audience - the military here we go again...geeez...
evidence shows that a large portion of the uninsured population could get coverage if they wanted it. talk about disputed. these claims have never been properly substiantiated in my view. and whether you want to dispute the 47 million by a few mil is moot to me. if it's 10 million, if it's 1 million,,,i would want to find a way to get them the care they deserve. you seem to think that i am defending hillary's "plan" and that ain't so... <b
Regardless of the specific details she wants a national healthcare system, and that alone is a bad idea. no , she doesn't necessarily. show me her plan that endorses "nationalized healthcare" and the details were you cropping her statements to make it look like she was all for the single payer option. People are free to make their points here, so go on with that nonsense. lighten up francis