i disagree guy..thank you for your opinion
Sean Conners aka SConn1
The 1st commandment of the Lord reads that we shall not worship any false gods in place or in leiu of Him. The Catholic Church, who claims to be the true church, mostly based on a loose interpretation of a vague phrase, blatnatly defies the Lord's commandment. They defy the Lord when they openly worhip and pray to Jesus's mother, Mary and the folks whom the
If I tried to write an article on this subject, i'd only end up plagarizing Keith, so i'll just let his words stand... OLBERMANN: And now as promised the special comment about the president‘s visit to Vietnam. It is a shame and it is embarrassing to us all when President Bush travels 8,000 miles only to wind up avoiding reality again. And it is pathet
The 1st commandment of the Lord reads that we shall not worship any false gods in place or in leiu of Him. The Catholic Church, who claims to be the true church, mostly based on a loose interpretation of a vague phrase, blatnatly defies the Lord's commandment. They defy the Lord when they openly worhip and pray to Jesus's mother, Mary and the folks whom the corrupt college of cardinals deem to be a "saint." They try to justify it thru dogmatic decrees and writings to their naive and ma
my last post translated into "pittsburghese" would be this... (1st part)it's in my blood..i was weaned on arn and perogies, lol. (2nd part) ak shooly, ats da 1 picksburgese phrase i always detested. it sounds uneducated and ig'nernt to me. ironically, i usually use "ya'll" wit not so much of a southerna accent. in this (philly) area, people say "yous" as if making "you" plural only required adding an "s." it sounds equally as ig'nernt to me as yins does. so i've stuck wit "ya
So your Steelerness comes naturally it's in my blood..i was weaned on iron city beer and perogies, lol. Do you say "yins"? actually, that's the 1 pittsburghese phrase i always detested.
Yup sounds like Bush is in for a ride until he's out in 2009. he may be. but i have been impressed with the democratic leadership including harry reid, whom i'm no big fan of. he and the others have been outspoken about being bi partisan and "treating the republicans as a minority as they would have liked to have been treated instead of the way they were (when the democrats were a minority party)." some pundits poo-poo that and claim "now they are gonna think congress is gonna b
i came out midland, but the 2 dominant red lines were the inland north and north central. philly was at the bottom for me. i guess that makes sense since i was born and raised in pittsburgh and philly accents are very noticeable to me.
thanks guy, funny, wasn't it?
Four United States Presidents get caught up in a tornado and off they whirled to the land of OZ. They finally made it to the Emerald City and went to find the Great Wizard. "What brings the 4 of you before the great Wizard of Oz?" Jimmy Carter stepped forward timidly and said: "I've come for some courage." "
what confuses me is that, if i understand what they are saying correctly, they feel the goverments of the states should send the 2 senators and not the people. i'm not sure i can agree that having the goverment appont or elect the 2 senators instead of giving the power t o the people of the sttes is a bad thing. and i'm not sure federal highway funds are strong enough of an argument to justify taking away power from the people. </fo
All depends on what the meaning of "is" is, after all. yeah
Sure, he was only confined to house arrest for life, but in the middle ages, that was how you could effectively silence someone. he couldn't "blog from the inside" or "broadcast from home" to get his messages out. the church essentially imprisoned him but sent him to the modern day equivalent of a minimum security prison instead of throwing him in the regular, maximum security prison. if someone is "house arrested" today, they can still communicate outside the house. In
thank you for your opinion daiwa:)
unfortunately lulabelle has been reduced to "legalisms and carefully worded denials" as a basis of her faith...pretty sad. if any church was "one true church" they wouldn't be full of scandal not only in aincient times, but in modern. and the scandals aren't superficial. the inquisition was about as brutal and inhumane as anyone in history has been. they were essentially catholic terrorists on a jihad for christ. as were the crusades as a whole...today, the church covers up every possi
Not inevitable? It's already happening, Sean. Read back on a few of Gideon's articles about CPS. i've read his stuff,,,some i agree with, some i don't. but again, i'm not looking to rip scabs off of old wounds and go round and round. i see the issue differently obviously and it's based on a lot more than a few blog articles. it's the result of m
"Well, why have you been doing it?" Because the stakes are high you might have interpreted it differently, but i took that as admitting to lying.
Actually, if I call you out by name in the text of my article, I can technically be considered to be violating the Terms of Use, Sean. You should know that by now. i thought that was in the title, not the text. i see plenty of people refer to one another in the text. and on th e"faith in government" thing. my faith is not with them to th
A few weeks ago, the owner of this site, was in a debate over at "instapundit" with famous comedian Rush Limbaugh. At the time, Rush called JU owner, Brad Wardell an "amateur" for not using his real name. Brad quickly changed that, eliminating Rush's point. But more importantly, Rush accused Brad and other conservatives of disloyalty and worse to the GOP because he, l
Go write another rant about it, and sit there and talk to yourself. You're getting as bad as jennifer with that crap. whatever whip...you go round here stirring things up, getting involved in other people's disputes and now when it comes time to own up to anything, you get all self righteous and huffy...it's the same old pattern from you...you and mm are 2 of a kind, ones who can dish it out, but can't ever admit their own errors. it's
that wasn't an answer. simple fact is that neither of you can show any evidence of me ever questioning his service here or anywhere. it would be easy to find, just go to the articles and responses.... or admit that you were wrong. cause i "apparantly" never did anything like you said i did in any way shape or form.
Let me help you. One is voluntary, the other isn't. and if ya wanna go there...it does appear from the way the events unfolded, that rumsfeld was encouraged to submit his resignation or be fired. Colin Powell resig
And your point is??? it was a response to someone else's statement. just pointing out he did what they said he shouldn't "have the right" to do. Since the man wasn't "fired" to begin with that
you suddenly believe Bush we all have our political beliefs, and i believe the new oversight in congress along with both sides desire not to look bad in the next two years will keep him more honest. as far as the past goes, we'll see where the investigations lead. i hope the democrats don't go witch hunting. i have said all along that in the end, and esp after the elections, regardless of result, that then it will be important for us al