Sean Conners aka SConn1

Sean Conners aka SConn1

Joined Member # 1037211
0 Posts 4 Replies 1,122 Reputation

Knock. Knock. You don't get to control what I write. If you don't want me to respond to your blog, say so, and I'll oblige. you are more than welcome to respond. but you will play by my rules on my blog, just like every other JU'er. just stop using that term "homosex" which is about as ignorant as it gets. this isn't about me as you are trying to spin it into. it is about you preaching filth and crying foul when you are called on it. <br/

88 Replies 36,919 Views

Most definetly on the Colmes part. He is soooo far out in the left field, he's outside the fence looking in. And clueless to boot! it's not his politics that i am talking about...it's his lack of debating skills and his children scaring face. he's essentially a prop for hannity to walk all over.

18 Replies 7,845 Views

Now it is Sen. Lugar that is saying it is time for us to withdraw from Iraq. When people with the experience and stature of Sen. Lugar split with Bush you know the game is OVER! i thought lugar spoke some interesting words today. but every time i hear that guy's name, i can't help but think of what a crass slang term it is for "sperm."

13 Replies 6,923 Views

Speaking of abortion, I was wondering Sean, how much you know about the trafficking of baby parts? There's quite a cottage industry going on there. Planned Parenthood not only gets hundreds of millions of our tax dollars, and plenty from the abortion industry, but also more revenue by selling baby parts. will you stop with the inflamatory BS like i asked you to do earlier? stop trying to make planned parenthood out to be some evil organization that greed

88 Replies 36,919 Views

She'd not only kill them in a debate, she'd cut them up and feed their innards to the buzzards. i'm not sure she'd kill em...hannity esp. is a pretty skilled debater. (a master, if you will, lol) . rush possibly, as he tends to lack fact and stick his footin his mouth on a reg. basis. rehm is a very skilled debater as well, it would be interesting. the one person i'm sure would lose the debate is colmes.

18 Replies 7,845 Views

Col, the election was in 2000, it's time for you to let it go and seek help. Bush won, get over it. true,,,there is no point in going over that over and over again. it's done, it's history. but coming from the crowd that embraced the swiftboaters and their lies when they wanted to trash john kerry...even tho his service, award reception and everything were every bit as settled is ironic , to put it mildly.

26 Replies 21,685 Views

Big deal, losing his licence to practice law is a slap on the wrist. This man stole and destroyed federal documents. Had you or I done that, we'd be doing hard in a federal pen. Yet all he gets is losing his licence. yep...big deal...the whole story was kind of a yawner to me. but the point was,,,it was settled, and now ya can stay true to your word and start jumpin on Dick. <img src="http://images.stardock.com/ju/T_JU/smiles/Wink.gif" border=0 align=

26 Replies 21,685 Views

look at that list again. notice how many are food critics, entertainment beat reporters and other journalistic endeavors that don't have squat to do with politics. whereas some (a minority) of these reporters probably should steer clear of donations, most of them don't work in political journalism. and also, note that some of these people's contributions don't really reflect their perspective. joe scarborough gave to republicans, yet

7 Replies 4,741 Views

but what is more comical is how this conversation from the religious right ended up on the same old cliches...abortion, gay marriage and the french. ya'll need a new batttle cry, lol.

88 Replies 36,919 Views

How does government regulate marriages presently? By issuing Marriage licences for one the federal government doesn't issue marriage licenses. so, by unconstitutional, do you mean that you have researched every state's constitution and deemed each and every one of them unconstitutional in issuing any civil union for any same sex couple?

88 Replies 36,919 Views

And they wouldn't have been burned at the stake by that point in history....you're wearing your "persecution hat" too tight. oh really? better tell this guy that... WWW Link

88 Replies 36,919 Views

well my rebuttal lula, will be brief. (hopefully) ... your position is abhorant in my view. in the above post, you essentially show that you simply don't want homosexuals to exist. you actually manage to throw people who either have or perform an abortion in with them, like they are some kindred spirits or something. the 2 issues have NOTHING to do with each other, except for the fact that you are against both. i'm done talking abortion in this thread, if others wish to scream

88 Replies 36,919 Views

This week, Judge Pearson walked out of court with nothing. He wasn't reimbursed in any way, and justice for the Korean couple who ran the dry cleaners he sued was served. Judge Pearson was one of those unreasonable customers all of us who have ever had the pleasure of dealing with customers occasionally run into. The customer who is wrong and trying to bull

6 Replies 4,640 Views

For the Republican who does not want a President who leads by polls, Mitt Romney is not their guy. So far, Mitt has shown his ability to out flip flop John Kerry by reversing his positions on abortion, gay marriage and most of the policies of his tenure as Massechucetts Governor. And now Mitt has "done it again" by declaring that this nation "is on the wrong

13 Replies 6,923 Views

Since when have I acted like abortions weren't happening before 1973? Of course there were abortions performed, just not to the tune of 4,000 per day and 6,000 on Saturdays here in America. Most Americans have no idea that 45 million abortions and still counting have been performed ever since 1973. i'm not doubting your numbers at all. you seem to assume that people who are pro choice politically are "pro abortion" as if they celebrate that. most people

88 Replies 36,919 Views

the fairnmess doctrine is actually one of the really decent examples of government knowing when to "take their mitts off" when they did so in 87. the doctrine did serve in the early days of broadcasting in ensuring that 1 powerful, rich group didn't monopoloize the airwaves. but by 87, we were looking at the internet in the future and cable was beginning to explode and diversify. it was time for the doctrine to go. and the government did the right thing. as thomas paine once s

18 Replies 7,845 Views

I wonder, would the "fairness doctrine" require a member of the "moral majority" to be on Howard Stern? I mean, as long as we're mandating balance here good example...that's why i brought up the daily show. the world of "news" is much fuzzier than it was in 87 when CNN was the only cable news network and most people got their news from only a few places that were all large and corporate. imus considered what he was doing to be "comedy." others

18 Replies 7,845 Views

I really wanted the chorus to be shouted out the first time around. The music built up but the vocals just sort of fell off. actually, that track, unlike the others, was recorded with one of my old bands, "Joe's Garage" a few years back. it was a live performance when the song was 1st being performed. i probably do scream it out more sometimes, and i'll keep that in mind for future performances. the other tracks are all me with overdubs. the ex

17 Replies 4,024 Views