talk about trolling,,,,lol...annonymous, lol...figures...and from what i can tell, in their hateful rage, they even spelled their name wrong, lmfao....oh well...
Sean Conners aka SConn1
yes it is phantom, lol:)
wah hit the shark square on the nose....the giggling comes from a lack of self confidence...ironically, i had a g/f back in my college age years that had the same problem. my parents would comment on what a distasteful trait that was to them, and after a while, it got to me too. just like wah's girl, my gal eventually found her legs and confidence and the tick dissappeared...for her it took a public speaking course and some success in life that i am su
i ended up more screwed up than i expected on the 1st test and in the 2nd level of hell on the 2nd test...woohoo! for us "lustful" types:)
thank you phantom:) much appreciated:)
for someone who was so bored and had such a hard time reading it,,,i noticed you managed to read all of it and bothered to write a bunch,,,kinda funny,,,i'll pass on your thoughts to Sam, tho I doubt he'll care. i didn't make any moral judgement in the story, just reported a scenario that happened...fact is that he didn't get busted and has never gotten busted and has flown many times before and after 9/11. and i agree with him that airline se
xx,,,i did do the research, and stand behind the facts presented...thank you for your comments:)
thank you deference:)
i'm dissapointed nothing of this came up in the after noon either...
update....i have gotten literally thousands of requests for the website address and other information....unfortunately, the information you seek is protected under the 1st ammendment of the constitution. i'm not here to get anyone busted and am not looking to give some other writer all my research for free. obviously with all th email i get still on this article, many people would like to know more,,,unfortunately, i would need someone to ste
well,,after the morning hearings...no mention of this knowledge since 1995 of plans to fly airplanes into the WTC et al...
oh, and the main source would be conservative columnist robert novak,,,guy seems to know a lot, lol...this column can be found at townhall.com in their archives..just look up novak and his articles are in chronological order,,,this one is dated sept 27, 2001. i hope that answered your question (between the 2 posts) xx...thank you for your comments:)
maybe you can ask the people i put in bold print....the following is what i see as the crux of the article...i can't believe that since this was reported, everyone seems to have forgotten about it... The shape of what happened Sept. 11 dates back to 1995, when chemicals intended to destroy U.S. commercial flights in mid-air exploded in a Manila apartment used by convicted terrorist Ramzi Yousef (now serving a life sentence for the
In my research, I stumbled across the following column...Quite revealing...I wonder if this will come out at the 9/11 hearings today...According to Novak, a highly respected conservative columnist who is so inside with the administration that he was able to get at least 1 White House official to give him classified information concerning CIA operative Valarie Plame (J
i agree deference, but not all our time,,,thanks for your thoughts:)
Recently, while doing some research, I stumbled upon some of Bill O'Reilly's writings. I have been taking special notice of what certain writers on both sides of the spectrum had to say before 9/11. As this very innapropriate "Bush vs. Clinton" battle rages on in the 9/11 commission investigation, I took special notice of the famous "non spinning" O'Reilly and his com
thanks again for the link wah,,,i finally got to check out the sight,,,some interesting articles, but a little too "conspiracy" oriented and i had a hard time with the overall perspective. good writing, but not exactly a prudent perspective and as much as they accuse everyone else of being wrong and their research unreliable, i had a hard time with some of their reasonings and sources. but it was interesting reading, and i always enjoy hearing
nitpicking one irrelevant thing like the typo issue and ignoring the rest (which you indeed did do) has become a trademark neocon tactic...make a big deal out of nothing, create smokescreens...anyone can read what i wrote, despite your denial,,,the typo crack was just a sidenote stuck in the middle...you ignored the points made concerning miller's track record in govt. and how people measure repect in others....you above this post again try to make it
thanks for the link wah, i'll check it out
i understand, thanks sherye:)
i'm not saying these are all the facts sherry,,,just ones that back up ones that do prove it. if you check out some archives of conservative, especially neoconservative journalists, you see some patterns. i gave examples using frank gaffney cause he is very well respected in those circles. and bob woodward, with his long credible track record. i think that while republicans and democrats are taking swipes at each other , some obvious stuff, w
after watching Rice for 3 hours,,,i am more convinced of his and the other's overall credibility.
after listening for over a week, i must say my favorite show is the randi rhodes show, 3-7 est. mon-fri. this gal will have you ready to march on the white house after 10 minutes. great host,,,i would like to see her get some more exposure.
i was happy to see Moveon.org respond to my concerns and change the ad,,,i like the new one much better:) in the new ad, they have someone imitating Bush, but it isn't underhanded, it says that in bold large print the entire time he speaks. they also use the quote, but not clarke's voice, which is much more acceptable if he doesn't want to be a voice on the ad. the words are testimony and i will concede that they are fair game, espec
you only corrected that after i pointed it out,,,the article was up there for some time..and no, that wasn't the main point,,,that was just having some fun at your expense and pointing that out...typos in the article are one thing, not spelling words right in the title are alittle more unprofessional. i was pointing it out for you to correct it in a crass way....i think the only one having a hissy fit is you here...there is nothing in my words that wou