breeders little whip? so , all these people are as you paint them huh? sounds to me like racism is driving your arguement here,,,i've lived in the inner city and the sticks, and good people and lazy ass people are inherent to neither, nor any race or color from what i've seen. some of em may be packed in a lil closer together and easier to spot in the city, but that means nothing. some of the best, hardest working people i've ever known are city dwelle
Sean Conners aka SConn1
in the president's and other folks plans, i have consistantly seen the path towards legalization include paying some sort of restitution. they also put the immigrants "at the back of the current line" of citizenship, so i guess that would mean a good 5-7 years before citizenship would be granted. i have also seen the requirement of english speaking, which i agree with and should be extended to all immigrants seeking citizen status. i have never seen an
Just as the weather is getting warmer this spring, the immigration battle has been heating up...again. I've put some thought into this issue, had some good, and not so good conversations on the topic, and have come away with some ideas. 1st off, it's just plain ridiculous to suggest the deportation on 10's of millions of people. It's not going to happe
Late today, by Washington standards, Porter goss resigned as head of the CIA. the suden announcement raises big question marks. Porter Goss, a critic of the agency, who was hand picked by george Bush to run the agency gave no reason for the resignation. No health reason, no "spending more time with the family" reason or anything else. His tenure was only about a year
lee,,,you make some valid points ,,,one problem,,,most of your analysis is based on "flat world" principles which have only really taken off in the last 10 years,,,and really the last 5 or 6. in the 80's ,, companies weren't nearly as internationally diverse...but still some things to consider ,,,thanks:) i do think that your perspective and belief that none of these companies would ever sell things they knew were being used for weapons...is
whatever guy,,,you obviously have no idea who i am....and i got my degrees (notice the plural) almost 2 decades ago just keep personally insulting me...shows your true ilk..if you want to argue about the ports deal and the logistics of it,,,see the article i wrote about that...and in the discussion of that, notice we got past the lil terminology "gotcha" games you are playin...on your way, notice that i write both pro and con about the left an
"tell me what exactly and how much of it." excuse me???? why do i need to do that? if you are interested in knowing that,,,,do your own research. if your motive is "disproving " something,,,it is a red herring....if you have something that disputes this,,,share with us,,,otherwise demanding research that might not be "at my fingertips" is just a scarecrow arguement,,,c'mon,,,you can do better than that. i have sourced and footnoted w
that's kind of a false bar of measure,,,the orig. "document" is prob electronic, not paper....but that's only speculation and "kind of makes me wonder" and the previous red herring "orig. doc." demand are hardly evidence against it's validity.
ummmm dr is it? i never said they were.
Although some elements of the US media have portrayed the document as faked or fraudulent, no official sources have questioned its accuracy or disputed its authenticity, despite being questioned directly about it on numerous occasions . Both UK and US officials have since either refused to affirm or deny its content, or else have tacitly validated its authenticity (as when Tony Blair replied to a press conference question by saying "That memo
oh geez,,,let's not get into the rumsfeld - hussein meetings....ok,,,here ya go ,,, First brought to the attention of the House of Commons by Labour MP Peter Kilfoyle on 26 February 2003, the Riegle Report details the findings of Senate hearings chaired by Senator Donald Riegle in 1994. The report confirms that when US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld was a member of the President’s General Advisory Committee on Arms Control in the 1980s,
it's not me that believes islam and arabs are the enemy,,,it's what i hear from many americans every day of the week.
and to be clear,,,i am asking questions for the most part here,,,not drawing conclusions necessarily.
about "arabs/muslims,,our enemy"...i was paraphrasing rhetoric,,,didn't mean to infer a quote,,,my bad.
for the record,,,here's a list of American companies that assisted with WMD to Iraq... List of American firms that assisted Iraq¹s WMD program A = nuclear; K = chemical; B = biological; R = rockets (missiles) 1. Honeywell (R,K) 2. Spektra Physics (K) 3. Semetex (R) 4. TI Coating (A,K) 5. UNISYS (A,K) 6. Sperry Corp. (R,K) 7. Tektronix (R,A) 8. Rockwell (K) 9. Leybold Vacuum Systems (A) 10. Finni
A few weeks ago, the nation was debating whether or not the USA should allow the sale of terminals in 6 major US ports to the goverment of the United Arab Emerates. The backlash of this "under the table" deal (the pres. was unaware of it until just before defending it to the press) was swift and severe. The issue found common ground between those on the left and those
i couldn't get past the horrible grammer in this one,,,and the opinions are racist, sexist and just plain strange imho
i couldn't get past the horrible grammer in this one,,,and the opinions are racist, sexist and just plain strange imho
,,,trolling,,,guy,,,by making your 1st line of your 1st post a personal attack on my site,,,was trolling. 2nd off,,,agree or disagree with me,,,i could care less...but don't tell me i don't have a source that i accurately reported on, when i did,,,and you didn't check anything out....when i asked you to,,,you came back by insulting me by forcing your homoerotic fantasies on me....that's trolling. all i did was write an article,,,i ne
keep talkin guy,,,i mean,,,keep trollin,,,LMFAO
excuse me trollmaster???? talk about condescending? i am not a conspiracy theorist,,,nor is there anything that suggests that,,,your "association" arguement is NONSENSE. maybe it's time to admit you were fooled...it's ok,,,we'll understand. my article is based on facts nad 1st hand interviews...i name my source...go fact check it,,,then get back to me.
by the way,,,dustin harmer is not my friend,,,i interviewed him and had no idea he was going to tell me that....he currently works in aberdeen testing military equipment...again,,,feel free to fact check
yeah,,but guy,,,i identified my source,,,you can feel free to fact check me....or stop trolling
Over the past 3 years, The "WMD" debate has raged on. Before the war, I doubted the administration's claims (as did 160 or so congressmen). I was told by more than one congressional staffer "you don't know...they have evidence we haven't seen that PROVES everything" before we invaded Iraq. After the invasion, as our occupation commenced, I was told "we will
In my many political discussions, I often point out my support for people and issues on both sides of the proverbial aisle. Rarely does anyone challenge me on that, and I often wondered why. Recently, someone who was debating me about another issue being hotly contested in our nation's capitol began on the old tired "what about bill?" "bill did this too!" diatribe tha