JoeUser ForumsAnyway, even if, and this was my underlying point, even if Daschle and others supported it, they were clearly rejected by the people. Since your comment w
85 Replies
27,843 Views
Chemicalkinetics
0
Posts
0
Replies
187
Reputation
Let me be simplier for you, jeblackstar. Find out the meaning of "Democratic Establishment" before you respond. You said you are a professor university professor. I hope you don't teach any social science, especially not politics. I will shot myself in the head if a professor of political science does not even understand the words "Democratic Establishment". </
85 Replies
27,843 Views
No, did the leadership of the democratic party, by the way, Daschle is out of a job come January, the head of the DNC will probably be out of a job soon, sympathize with Moore in his Bush bashing? W
85 Replies
27,843 Views
TBone has contributed some of the most factual and articulate articles seen here Someone who relies on factual proofs and is articulate in his expression should certainly understand what a "personal attack" is. Thus, it is more confusing for him to charaterized little_whip in that manner. If you only
6 Replies
2,905 Views
Hmmm...nope, not gonna happen. But I'm sure it's a nice dream for you to have. I'm fairly sure there were people simular to you on the left who thought something much the same after Clinton won his second term. But no. The Democrats will restructure, rebuild, and come back to retake power, hold it for a while, then it'll go back
13 Replies
10,125 Views
To be honest. I have no idea what happened between the two of them. However, by just looking at the two posts you put out there. T_Bone4Justice either mistaken little_whip as someone else or he completely zoomed out. There was no personal attack in that by little_whip. Personal attacks are like: calling someone a liar or a moron. Assasination of personal characters. little_whip didn't do that in the post. T-Bone4Justice, you completely overreac
6 Replies
2,905 Views
Just keep looking at that map and the sea of red you're drowning in. What some people don't realized is that the South is increasing under the control of Republican Party. Twenty years ago, the south votes republicans for presideny, but vote for democratic senator, house of resprensentative, governors
13 Replies
10,125 Views
That is a horrible analogy rhetorically speaking.... Let me rephase it then: Let's say I sent a lady a donzen roses. Do I really like her? Probably, but you won't know for sure. Did I publically show my affication to her? Yes. Does the DNC sympathize Moore by going a merry-trip to his movi
85 Replies
27,843 Views
That is a horrible analogy rhetorically speaking.... You mean it is illogical? How so?
85 Replies
27,843 Views
I am going to cut and paste some defintion of a neocon here. I think some not all reader have no idea what a neocon. Neocon, in fact, are mostly FDR Democrats. Later, they are joined by Teddy Rooverselt Repubicans. Democrats got changed so much they forgot who they once were. Anyway, Rumsfeld and Cheney are not FDR Democrats and they are not neo-con. They were in power when Nixon was president. How can
41 Replies
23,217 Views
GW Bush used a man hated by his dad. hmmmm ill let that one simmer a while uncommented; it really is too tempting but... Seriously. The inside story is always that HW Bush and Rumsfeld dislike each other alot. Just as today, you hear Powell and Cheney dislike each other. As for the fac
41 Replies
23,217 Views
5. The critic picked on the really unimportant points in an attempt to discredit everything Moore says. I've lied on occasion in my life, most of us have, but that doesn't mean I can't speak the truth. Didn't I point out an important point? If Moore implies that Iraq War is a distraction to capture the
41 Replies
23,217 Views
imply? hell if one of the founders of project for a new american century and a signatory to the pnac's 1998 letter calling on clinton to invade iraq and ov
41 Replies
23,217 Views
Wow, even more blatent arrogance than yelling at me for saying Cheers. You are not correct, the three people who were mentioned in your post, and the article, are not, or will not be soon, affiliate
85 Replies
27,843 Views
So you don't think that
85 Replies
27,843 Views
I read your article. I am not going to comment everything, but one thing is out of place. Rumsfeld is not a neocon and your artcile seems to imply that. People who doesn't know what a neocon would say that. Also Rumsfled was not in power for a long time. He did start early and regained power in his late age, but he was powerless for a long time. Nixon hated him. George H. W. Bush dislikes him alot, sup
41 Replies
23,217 Views
endorse /indorss/ (US & Law also indorse) • verb 1 declare one’s public approval of. 2 sign (a cheque or bill of exchange) on the back to specify another as the payee or to accept responsibility for paying it. 3 Brit. enter an endorsement on (a driving licence). It is clear that the Democratic esta
85 Replies
27,843 Views
I don't think there is much argument about the fact that the Bush family is into Oil, and you can't be in the Oil Business with out being tied with the Saudis Greatest logic written here in Joe User. I mean I am j
41 Replies
23,217 Views
I think it is an endorsement. When they all show up to his film premiere. How is that an act of sympathy? It would be an act of sympathy if the Democrats think his movie is going to be unsuccessful, so they better go and cheer him up. Yet we know that is not the philosphy behind it. The reason the Democratic senators and representatives went to the preimere is to endorse the movie -- is to hope more people will see the movie and thus unseat George
85 Replies
27,843 Views
I think it is an endorsement. When they all show up to his film premiere. How is that an act of sympathy? It would be an act of sympathy if the Democrats think his movie is going to be unsuccessful, so they better go and cheer him up. Yet we know that is not the philosphy behind it. The reason the Democratic senators and representatives went to the preimere is to endorse the movie -- is to hope more people will see the movie and thus unseat George
85 Replies
27,843 Views
If as you said that you have done your research, then you should know Michael Moore is a liar. If you don't even know that, then you should go back to do some more researchs before posting an article. To be honest, I am embarrassed for you, and you should too. For one, Moore in his film points to the decision to wage war on Iraq has made us relocate the military power from Afghanistan to Iraq, thus caused
41 Replies
23,217 Views
Let's just face it. I am correct. The Democrat establishment was closely tied to Michael Moore and enorsed his movement. You don't get to see a bunch of Republican senator meet with Sean Hannity in his book signning. You won't get to see Rush Limbaugh sit next to ex-Presdient in the Republican National Convention. The degree in which the Democratic politicans embrace Mr. Moore is unprecedent.
85 Replies
27,843 Views
PolMach ForumsHelp me historyishere. He kept on saying "Cheers" to me. I am depressed and distressed and sacred. Save me!
85 Replies
27,843 Views
parts of your statement are correct as well, but they were phrased so as to be misleading Hey, my previous statements were not misleading. My statements were more specific than yours. I clearly used the word "Democratic establishment" and "Democratic politicans". Your words are more vague, like Democ
85 Replies
27,843 Views
Anyway, yes, in a manner of speaking, my time is more valuable than yours in this case. You've got the cite, however you found it, and are hoarding it, and I wouldn't even know where to start looking for it. Actually when the Democratic establishment attene
85 Replies
27,843 Views