Don't worry about it. It is to help smooth your letterings.
Chemicalkinetics
Awesome. I have yet to beat Lincoln using Kerry and beat FDR using GW Bush.
Well, when I use a negative ads of "My opponent is against Jobs", the overall importance of Jobs do drop (you can see that on the Zoby Poll page.) I have yet to understand the other two ads as I mentioned. Like I am against this or My opponent is for this. Sure, I am refereing specifically Outsourcing as that is an important issue for Ohio and Penn.
What are the major difference between a positive ads and a negative one? I know if I run an TV ad on "I support War on Terrorism". Not only my rating on that issue will improve, but it will become a more important issue for voter. If I run an TV ads on "My opponet opposes War on Terrorism", the not only his rating will suffuer, but the issue will become less important. But what about the other two? The "I am against ....." and "Opponent is for ...
The weekly change is only for state basis. So having few newspaper can be a cheaper way to beat a TV ads in specific state, espeically issues are less national. For example, Alaska cares for oil drill but no other states care for that. It may be a good idea to post newpaper there. I don't understand your question about national position. Are you talking about how Zoby Poll rates you? It rates you based on how many people believe in you.
Thank you for your response whoman, but that is not the case. As I pointed out, in california, both of our awareness are at 100, and I was ahead on top three issue. Yet, Clinton was leading me in California with 47% to 45% (something like that). I don't get it. I am way ahead on top three issues. LIke 100+ points. Just to also point this out, Clinton didn't put any spin doctors or smearer there. Have anyone else seen this? I have such a easy ti
I have been playing with Kerry and all is fine until I reach Lincoln who gave me a good beating. I then start with George W. Bush and noticed something very unusal and I think someone mentioned this before. My George W. Bush was way ahead in the Zoby Poll in the top 4-5 national issues. Literally, I have 80-90% of the people favor my position, yet I was completely behind in the election (according to the map color). This has happened both when I ra
(1) if the option becomes available after a particular event/date? (2) how I'll be able to tell that the option has become available (does an icon appear in a particular state or does an interview screen pop up?) (3) why the interview function as featured in the game manual has been removed at all? I honestly think that it
I honesty do not get some of these presidential traits. I have a feel for "intelligence", "funding ability", "money", "experience" and others because their noticibility. In the case, of a high rating of "money" allow my candidate to start of the game with larger initial money. High "experience" point allows less expensive endorsement. However, what does "credibility" and "integrity". The game states that these are core issues to voters, and looking at
FOXnews is baised toward Repubican agenda, but its poll is reliable. If you look at FOX poll, the result is much better than liberal news like NY TImes/CBS poll. NYTimes/CBS poll is a joke.
I honesty do not get some of these presidential traits. I have a feel for "intelligence", "funding ability", "money", "experience" and others because their noticibility. In the case, of a high rating of "money" allow my candidate to start of the game with larger initial money. High "experience" point allows less expensive endorsement. However, what does "credibility" and "integrity". The game states that these are core issues to voters, and looki
I am just sick of people who claimed to care about Iraqis by saying the War on Iraq inflicted heavy causalty on them. As oppose to the oil sanction was more humane? Killing Iraqi people at rate ten times faster and target children instead of terriosts. Be realisitic. When you say no to war, you are saying yes to the statue quo, which is the oil sanction.
I wanted to end. In fact, twice. Until you started to accused me of something you did. You accused me of not understanding and distinguish my words and misleading others. I think anyone read the posts know who is person which are confused with words.
Even if it were, are you telling me that we let the guy who orchestrated the attacks get away? Then, six months later, we're done with Osama, and have decided we need to kick Saddam's butt over in Ir
OR wait a couple of months for the inspectors to finish, find out there are no weapons, tell the UN that Saddam needs to be removed, have the support of the UN, have more coutries to share the burden
The font is really bad. However, I can copy and paste the text to somewhere else like right here: I must know: why did America Re-elect a George Bush. Admittedly, Kerry had his weak points, but Bush didn't have a strong point! He lost 820,000 jobs, drove the surplus of the 90's into a multibillion-dollar deficit, hrt education so bad that it's embarrassing, made healthcare a thing of the past, did away with the environment, led us into a blac
Iraq was not a land of happiness before the US overthrew Saddam. That is probably
Here is an article in which Bush was "goofing" around at his ranch with President Jiang, while talking about North Korea's nuclear weapon program. http://archives.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/east/10/24/china.us/
AP May 24, 2004 Fahrenheit 9/11 was the first documentary to win Cannes’ prestigious Palme d’Or since Jacques Cousteau’s The Silent World in 1956. Moore and Cousteau? Isn't this an apples and cumquats comparison? Isn't the REAL issue calling his film(s) a documentary? Isn'
Reply #30 By: Cappy1507 - 11/16/2004 9:47:51 PM If I believ
I think what Moore beli
And yet it is still a cycle. The opposite is happening here in south-eastern Minnesota, just in the other direction and on a much smaller scale. A very conservative and rural area is trending back towards the Democrats, electing new representatives at the state level (and we were sooooo close in my district to ousting a 10-year R
I didn't want to write anymore until you make personal accusation upon me... of how I mislead people. This is your first response to my first post here. Honesty, who is confused? Reply #40 By: jeblackstar - 11/13/2004 2:59:50 PM Nah. The Michael Moore factor is more than just Michael Moore himself. It is the fact that many Democrat establishment actually embrace Michael Moore. Many Democrat politicans attended Moore's Fahre
It would take too long to go back through every post and put down everything you said which proves that point, but allow me to summarize. Many times you u