Chemicalkinetics

Reply to Michael Moore to film sequel to Fahrenheit 9/11 in Politics JoeUser Forums

I do not mean to insult you. Sorry. It is just that when you say you don't want to waste time to find the source. It implies that your time is more valueable than mine. Doesn't it? Anyway, I will porivde you a source now from CBS news: "But last night the city's political heavyweights -- well, the Democratic ones, at least -- greeted Moore with open arms as they turned out en masse for the Washington premiere of his new film Fahrenheit 9/

Reply to Michael Moore to film sequel to Fahrenheit 9/11 in Politics JoeUser Forums

I'm sorry, but everything in your post, with the exception of Michael Moore being at the convention, I do not agree with, nor do I believe your assertions. I would ask that you cite something saying Daschle delayed his floor vote, I would ask for a cite saying that "many democrat polit

Reply to Michael Moore to film sequel to Fahrenheit 9/11 in Politics JoeUser Forums

Michael Moore does not speak for myself, any democrat I know, or the Democratic Party as a whole Really? Than why did the Democratic Party embraced and promote Moore? Why did Democratic politians used Moore's "facts" to discredit the

Reply to Michael Moore to film sequel to Fahrenheit 9/11 in Politics JoeUser Forums

Well, perhaps another figure will emerge from the darkest wings of the Right to serve that purpose... Nah. The Michael Moore factor is more than just Michael Moore himself. It is the fact that many Democrat establishment actually embrace Michael Moore. Many Democrat politicans attended Moore's Fahren

Reply to New Moore's Movie in Politics JoeUser Forums

Hello there

Reply to Michael Moore to film sequel to Fahrenheit 9/11 in Politics JoeUser Forums

I posted a similar article before you, historyishere. How come everyone response to yours, and no one response to mine. Maybe they were all asleep when I wrote that (5:00AM)

Reply to Is the party over? in Democrat JoeUser Forums

Psikotik: First, the Democratic Party doesn't sponsor or control Michael Moore. No, they don't. But the facts that the Democratic establishment praised Moore and used his movie as factual reference to attack Bush's policy and the washington hill democrats gathered and showed up to the premier o

New Moore's Movie in Politics JoeUser Forums

Michael Moore is making a sequal to Fahrenheit 9/11 movie, calls "Fahrenheit 9/11 1/2." Is he further going to weaken the Democratic Party by marginalizing it? After George W. Bush re-elected, the Democrat Party (espeically the DLC) has done alot of soul-searching to understand how the Republican Party has gained seats in executive, legislative branches and governorships in two elections -- inevitably the judicial branch as well. Many liberal column

Reply to Bush's Morals are Top Notch! in Politics JoeUser Forums

delete this message

Reply to Bush's Morals are Top Notch! in Politics JoeUser Forums

Incredibly informative, the best argument for the Iraq war given at JU. I guess we will never convince each other's point of view. Although I am sure our conversations have help us understanding the concerns from the other side. Certainly, this is not a black-and-white situation as many believe. Bes

Reply to Bush's Morals are Top Notch! in Politics JoeUser Forums

Incredibly informative, the best argument for the Iraq war given at JU. I guess we will never convince each other's point of view. Although I am sure our conversations have help us understanding the concerns from the other side. Certainly, this is not a black-and-white situation as many believe. Bes

Reply to Bush's Morals are Top Notch! in Politics JoeUser Forums

Moreover, the oil sanction didn't work for 12 years That's what we are told, but in reality, we suffered no detriment from them as opposed to this conflict. I don't think you get the purpose of a preventive war. According to you, we should have never attacked German in World War 2, since they didn't

Reply to Holy SHIT!!! in Politics JoeUser Forums

Yes, it's true! If all votes are counted in Ohio, Kerry will win the presidency! Try this link: http://bellaciao.org/en/article.php3?id_article=4201 Is that what we have become? We site a communist site for proof that Bush has lost? Should I go to some neo-nazi site and show that

Reply to Bush's Morals are Top Notch! in Politics JoeUser Forums

I am sorry the Darfur argument doesn't buy you anything. It doesn't show the invasion is wrong Of course it doesn't prove the invasion itself wrong, it simply shows the lack of consistancy in foreign policy with the precedent set by invading Iraq regarding the humanitarian mission. By the way, I

Reply to Bush's Morals are Top Notch! in Politics JoeUser Forums

In regards to the oil sanctions, it was less a cost to Americans to engage in economic warfare and keep Saddam down then plunder ourselves attempting to do something George H.W. Bush himself stated was impossible to do - invade Iraq and withdraw easily while accomplishing the mission. Now we are paying the price. For what? I don'

Reply to Bush's Morals are Top Notch! in Politics JoeUser Forums

First of all, if you want to blame the 6000 children deaths per month to Saddam, why can't I also blame the Iraqis deaths during the Iraq invasion on Saddam? I blame the deaths in Iraq on the dictator who starved his people and failed to provide them with food though it was avail

Reply to Bush's Morals are Top Notch! in Politics JoeUser Forums

Sudan. USA is involved, and probably the most involved country. So why attack the country which try to help the most? http://www.azstarnet.com/dailystar/relatedarticles/38273.php http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/africa/06/30/sudan.powell/

Reply to Bush's Morals are Top Notch! in Politics JoeUser Forums

I blame the deaths in Iraq on the dictator who starved his people and failed to provide them with food though it was available through the oil for food program Saddam abused. You are aware of this. You are also aware that though there are people in Darfur suffering humanitarian neglect:

Reply to Bush's Morals are Top Notch! in Politics JoeUser Forums

U.N. inspectors have identified dozens of U.S. firms, some that received U.S. export licenses, that supplied Iraq with equipment used in missile programs and chemical, biological and nuclear weapons programs. That will be a tough one. Because US never has a biological weapon program known. I am

Reply to Bush's Morals are Top Notch! in Politics JoeUser Forums

Thanx, J.E., from saving me the time explaining that and for providing a credible source link. ChemicalKinetics, I like your reasoned post...let me reply later... Hmm, I don't and haven't denied we have sided with Iraq. I only disagree with you on "we sell them arms". Technically, we didn't. A

Reply to Bush's Morals are Top Notch! in Politics JoeUser Forums

During the Iran-Iraq war, the united states were supplying arms to Iran (Iran-Contra conflict), while they were aggressively bitching at everyone else to stop selling weapons to them. However, the CIA gave the Iraqi government intelligence information throughout the war via the Saudis and trade credits and dropped any objections

Reply to Bush's Morals are Top Notch! in Politics JoeUser Forums

This was the fault of Saddam, a guy Rumsfield gave 60 billion in food and arms (chemical weapons at that) to in 1982. Today, instead of letting the senile dictator die off, we bleed our treasury dry bombing the infrastructure of Iraq to smithe

Reply to Liberals Immersed in Night Logic in Politics JoeUser Forums

in technologies Japan and South Korea are either already ahead or rapidly catching up. You can't be too narrow in your definition. It is very true that Japan and Korea has and probably supassed us in many technological industries such as automobile and TV and DVD. However, if you look closely they sur

Reply to Bush Won? in Democrat JoeUser Forums

While you might be correct the numbers have changed. It's Bush 52% Kerry 47% I heard that too, but haven't read the number yet.

Reply to My Quotes: Election Aftermath in Politics JoeUser Forums

The vanity of war takes precedence over the drudge of diplomacy. Diplomacy for 12 years?