No. They weren't scared of us back then. They had a saying. "You kill one Chinaman, 10 more take his place". To them soldiers were expendable and they potentionally had a lot more of them then we did. I thought it is 100 more take his place. Anyhow I don't think Chinaman is a very good term, maybe you
Ok, let me phase this correctly. You said you don't think China will get in the next Korea War between US and Korea because China will be too scared. If so, why did China got involved in the first Korean War? Why wasn't China scared of USA back then? What I am saying is that whatever make China got in the first Korean War is as good as the reasons for the next Korean War. That is why I said, "What make y
Outright the most ridiculous articule I read.
Now if we took on North Korea, China would most likely keep out of the picture out of fear of starting World War IV and being attacked from two different directions and Russia might step in as well against China, than again who knows. You mean if USA attacks N. Korea now, China would not defend N. Korea
No offense. But exact how huge the chinese army was there? You think there was a 10:1 army force difference? Chinese army was not known to be well-equipped. Are you telling me that the Chinese has a huge army in Korea and that the Chinese government somehow has enough equipment for a huge army. Anyway, these are not my main points. You have to agree on the War on Terriosm, we have every statue
I don't like FOX News. It's too biased. That's why I read the New York Times instead. Speaking of New York Times, did you hear how they've officially endorsed Kerry? Yes, that makes very good sense, since NY Times is more baised as a media than FO
Hey you can use Vietnam, but Korea is a different story, improperly equipped soldiers fighting an army that attacked in waves. My Grandfather hated the Chinese Army until they day he died because of Korea, but if it came to us fighting China again, we would not hold back. Not to mention
Hey LIttle Whip, Ha ha ha. Don't be so personal. I am a strong supporter of the Bush adminstration. I was simply pointing out that the terriosts aren't exactly looking at the WW2 generation. They are looking at our failure in Korean and Vietanam War as examples to how they can defeat us. Why would anyone use the WW2 as example, that generation is slowly dying. On the other hand, the Korean
To be honest, Moore is anti-American. That is not only because he is against Bush and the Iraq War. Afterall, he also against the Afghansistan War. He simnply against everything American stands for. He is against free market society, he is against free specch (except his speech), he plays racial card all the times. The guy is just ANTI-?
Word of warning though, continue to piss us off and we are likely to lose our civilized minds and if you think hiding behind a mask will protect you, you have never seen a pissed off America, ask the Japanese and Germans what happens when you make us really mad. Yeah, but what about the more r
Ok. Thank you for the clarification. Do you have a reference for the poll you mentioned? Thanks. I got the number either from the Gallup poll video or a Gallup poll article. Unfortunely, Gallup poll is being a bit cheap these days. You can look at the new poll for free, but any poll older than a day,
You are mistaken. Catholics traditionally, from FDR to Kennedy, voted for Democrats, but for Nixon, Reagan (twice), and Bush-41, they voted for Republicans. In 2000, the Catholic vote was roughly split between Gore and Bush. You are correct. In term of the 2000 result, I was refering not the election r
Hi CK, I think I was fairly clear I was talking about Bush's popularity in other countries, not domestic
I can't believe this is even an article. It is not surprising that Kerry lead the Catholic vote. It is unsual for Bush to be that competitive among Catholics. Catholics have always voted for Democrat presidential candiates. Kennedy, Clinton, Gore.... by huge marign. This is like an article telling me that Kerry has black voters...
Well, I said sort of northeast because she has been living in Washington and Boston with her husband and family and that is "sort of" that area. I understand she spends a considerable amount of time on the road too, hehehe. I am refering the fact that she is not born here and not raised here. It is lik
Myrrander, Bush is kinda of popular in US. His popularity is at least above 50%. Go read Gallup poll. Regarding Allawi, it is not simply about you trust him or not, the question is "Do you have to work with this guy?". I don't like the a lot of foreign leaders, but that doesn't mean the USA should start calling them liars.
My god. You seriously think Allawi was happy after hearing Kerry called him a liar, and that John Howard really simle when Kerry campaigned against him.... In that case, maybe Bush should have called the French and German liars and campaigned against them. That will make them h
Look, I am not asking you to prove to me beyond the reaosnable of doubt. I am just saying if you know at how Bush offended the German and the French, and the way how Kerry is offending the British, Australian and Iraqi. Kerry is more offensive. Kerry campaigned against John Howard for god sake. He was campaigning for the Auastralian party which would have withdraw the troops (that was the labor party's pr
Ok, how is Kerry going to build the grand coalition. I am not getting that? The French and the new Spanish governments have already said they won't send any troops in Iraq, no matter who wins the election, and I don't blame them. Countires do what is best fit for their interes
Yeah, I can understand how Bush changed his policy because in his mind the world has transformed into a more dangerous place after 9/11. National security suddenly surpass everythinh else. Because of that, foerign policy negotiations will be placed after national security. It is like the priorty changed if someone realized he has lung diesase. He may quits smoking. What I don't understanding is
Latour, I agree. I know US try to influence foreign election and other countries have tried to influence US election. However, it is not a openly embraced issue. It is like I know murdering occurs, doens't mean we should embrace murdering. I was trying to say we should not embrace influencing a US election from outside. It is just wrong. I don't care if it is the French's pro-Kerry movement or the Putin's pro-Bush speech. They are unn
Sally, I apologize for the mistake. Maybe I read your article wrong. I thought it is one of those British thing, which I heard recent, to rally British people to write letter to American to change their mind in our nelection. Sorry.
Texas Wahine, Good luck with the cookie and tell me later if you like them later.
Texas Wahine, I think my link (in the previous post) has the exact receipt for Laura's chocolate oatmeal cookie. Sounds very tasty, but probably unhealthy... with all those chocolate..... Oh my, I just read her receipt, it seems unhealthy but tasty. Hahahahah. Alot of sugers and eggs and...
No one think Laura has the toughest job in the wholewide world. But the point is that teacher is certainly considered as a job and Teresa accidently forogt about that fact is weird. I believe Teresa didn't know the question of the inteview ahead, but she certainly know the interview will include "How do you compare you to Laura Bush?". Typically, campaign manager will inform candidate before any interview.
JoeUser Forums
PolMach Forums