By invading Iraq, we've angered the entire arab world, all we need is one more invasion and then we'll have a huge jihad on our hands... No, we are not. If anything we anger the Western European more. Having you read my link to you earlier? By the way, yo
I was not trying to delete your post. I accidently submit the same post twice. Since I cannot delete mine second "duplicated" post. I simply edit it as "delete".
nvm, just forget I said anything... oh, and btw I know alot about war, also, we didn't need to bomb Hiroshima or Nagasaki. Why not just somewhere the Emperor could see it clearly, but not on top of many civilians... But the bomb was necessary to keep the Japanese from using their 7600 hidden jet planes... Also, I know that war is
delete
I am unsure if your last reply is about Iraqis suddenly get killed on the street or American GI suddenly get killed on the street. In the case, you are talking about Iraqis. I suppose today Iraqis are killed by sudden event instead of a gradual death. First of, I still like to point out the death caused by oil sanction is 100 times more higher. Second, I rather get shot on the street then starve to death.
Ok..., but I thought your earlier article said Iraqi was safer before the Iraq War, which is not. That was my point. Look, Iraqis beleive the invasion is justified. We have to ask ourselve what kind of horrible life they had for a nation to "prefer" an invasion. The death rate during the oil sanction was horrible. I hope you read my link. Those are figures which everyone agreed. The UN, the Clinton adminstration also agree. Quote in a
Ha ha ha . Good question on politicans. Well, maybe because there are more white people. There are only 13% blacks (mayeb 15%). I do see about 10% of the politicans are blacks. A better question should be men versus women because you certainly don't see half of the politicans as females. I understand your argument, but I think you missed mine. You said that coastal people understand terrorism because they have a higher probablity to be a
You are wrong. Iraq was a very dangerous place before the war. Yes, people were not killed by bombs, they were killed by lack of foods and medicine. As to 1996, 5 years after the oil sanction, a millions of Iraqi children straved to death because of us. In 2001, assume there had been 2 millions death. That is only the children. Do you honesty think Bush killed 2 millions of Iraqis? The death rate has d
First off, Ohio didn't vote for Bush because of Terrorism. I think you should get your facts straight first. If you have the wrong assumptions, you are bound to get the wrong conclusion. Ohio top reasons for voting for president is:values and economy. Second, are you telling me the only people in NY can vote for terrorism issue? That is the dumbest idea I have heard today (not meant to attack you persona
But sometime bleeding heart people is not logical. For example, people always talk about the Iraq War kills many Iraqis. Yes, but the 12 years oil sanction killed 100 folds more people, literally. Lifting the sanction without removing Saddam is even worse. He killed his people in millions. I think bleeding hearts do not consider all aspects of life. While they oppose one thing, they fail to see the bigg
You know I was teasing you, right? I was trying to be funny. Anyway, I am a Bush supporter, and I agree with you. What she did is wrong and what you did is correct. I understand it will be difficult to disagree with her since she is your mentor and she doesn't seem like the kind of person you can disagree. You know, there are people who are vocal yet you know you are safe to disagree with. Anyway, there are always people who believe in so
That is why Edwards has the best chance, and having Hillary as VP would have him in the North and Mid-West. Are you kidding. Edwards is good to look at a distance, but he will be destoryed in a real campaign. First of, since you like to look at the past Democratic presidents to show southern democrat
I think Bob Kerrey has a better chance. He's not going to run. My aunt works for him at NuSchool in New york. I heard, but I like him. I also mentioned Powell which I also know he is not ever going to run for President. I like lieberman too, but he doesn't have any chance for 2008. He ran
You know.... you sound like a woman. Can you just make the story shorty without all the details and drama.
And the Religous Right shouldn't be pushing it down the liberal states throat by trying to amend constitution or making laws banning all Gay Marriage everywhere. Why not?
Government make legal binding for marraige. Recongnization of a legal vow/binding is not the same as recongnization of love. First off why are they using a term that has normally connotated love and religion for years? Second off if it isn't recognizing love then why should it be able to judge one more worthy then another
This is exactly why the Democrat has lost. They do not face the truth. When 1960 Nixon lost to Kennedy by 0.2 %. He didn't ask for recount. Is there any reason why Democrat is the only party cry foul all the time? Bush defeats Kerry by 5%. It is a solid lead. Not a landslide, but a solid lead. Whoman, I am not surprise democrats votefor republican candidate in large number. First, we have
Yeah, seems like JU is running rampant with defeatist end times Pseudo-Anarchist (because true Anarchist hate the left agenda along with the right) Bigots and it is sort of pissing me off because I thought I quit pissing in their Wheaties...ah well maybe that is why they are so angry... Some people like to be pissed off and t
Agree. But what you wrote is pretty much agreed by everyone.
Marriage is not always entered into as a holy institute (atheists DO get married, for one thing). Two people need only go downtown and file the necessary papers to be recognized as legally married. No church (or other religious endorsement) is required. Exactly correct. I think some people get confused
JoeUser Forums
doesnt talk to the congressional black caucus, doesnt go to black churches and has not put in policies to help black people Where did you hear that? During the debate, when Kerry and Edwards said those untrueful lies? Do you read news or you simply go to s
By the way, this is a very interesint issue, I like to point out. Nightline Tedd Kroppel said during the elections, he has asked many Americans about different issues such as War in Iraq, tax, eduction.... audiences are always very vocal about their opinions and their reasons, except for gay marraiage. He noticed that most people dislike the nation of recongization of gay marraige (I am not talking about civil union). Yet, people won't talk about it
Texas, Thank you for your kind words. Well, then let's me repeat my old question to you. You may have answered it in another post already..... Have you tried the cookie receipt? If you think the recepit is ok, then maybe I will try it too. If you think Laura's cookie suck, then I can skip it. Best. P.S.: I made a pretty bad ty
And so this community is supposed to also give special rights to these people who are supposed to be in love? Personally I don't think the government should be recongizing any union as more special then another. I get it now. Your going to secure rights with marriage but your going to k
I am unsure when I offended you since I haven't write to you sometime, and last time is about Laura's cookies recepit, so I doubt that offended you. Well, in response to your earlier post, yes, I do understand you are concern for your husband. Maybe I don't feel the same degree of worry and apin, it doesn't mean I don't understand. I am unsure why that is so hard for you to believe that. I know friends who are deployed (yes, you are right, they are
You're about to visit an external site:
Sign up here to get the latest news, updates, and special offers delivered directly to your inbox.
PolMach Forums