I'd buy tens of copies of Windows 8 at that price but I only need it on one computer! (maybe two)
Savyg
The spyware argument is ridiculous. Steam 'spies' on your system more than Origin does. Heh. I can't believe people actually believe that garbage, but whatever floats your boat.
[quote who="Tridus" reply="37" id="3188751"]EA's stock is going down because The Old Republic cost a ton of money and isn't holding a large enough subscriber base to make it back. I don't think there's a lot more to read into it then that.[/quote] According to the conference call it's still holding at about 1.3 million subscribers. Considering people are still throwing numbers like 500k about I'd think there's a lot of misinformation going around.
[quote who="AgentExeider" reply="34" id="3188414"]The reason EA's value is tanking is because it's going down to where it's actually worth. EAs network in recent times has been based on acquisitions and NOT natural and actual growth, the company has been operating in the RED for years. [/quote] http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ:EA&fstype=ii Apparently, now they're not. I
Back to pretending to be serious then... I only use Antec Sonata cases myself. Mesh lets the noise out when I've used it (CM-690)
[quote who="DrJBHL" reply="8" id="3188226"]Yeah. Suicide's much better. Note: Only if drugs and all other dangerous treatments fail.[/quote] What other dangerous treatments? Beating em with a stick? [e digicons]:|[/e] Anyway, I'd personally love to have something like this though I'm not suicidal. Just not sure I couldn't find a better way.
I wouldn't trust DBS any more than I do pacemakers. Obviously they can be necessary, but enough of em screw up to make you worry. Mind you it sounds like a great idea, just a tiny bit dangerous.
Arriving at my place Tuesday damn holidays [e digicons]:grin:[/e]
[quote who="Daiwa" reply="9" id="3187045"]It's a feather balanced on the edge of a piece of paper now, so not looking for any slight breezes.[/quote] As XP always has been [e digicons]:grin:[/e]
[quote who="GIEST310" reply="19" id="3187849"] that put intrusive software on your machine that fucks it up [/quote] yeah, Steam installs that 'intrusive' software called Steam on your machine and allows you to fuck it up at your leisure which you probably already did given your attitude heh
It had no issues whatsoever when I played it, but I was only really playing it to tide me over til The Secret World came out.
The Secret World Just Cause 2 Saints Row 3 Crackdown 1 Burnout Paradise (I love the newer Need for Speeds as well but they don't do the full on city thing.) And Arkham City deserves an honorable mention.
[quote who="Galacticruler5000" reply="26" id="3187757"]C&C 2 is Tiberian Sun, while somewhat buggy, its till better than C&C 3 because it was developed by WW, but budget and time were limited by EA and it got cut 75% through development.[/quote] If you say so. I thought 2 sucked hardcore. 3 was actually pretty damn good except for being a remake. 4 was just...ugh. I'm seriously hoping Generals 2 is a 64 bit only title, but I doubt it. We&#
I mean seriously, "I'm sorry your game is going to lose us millions and be a major black eye in our portfolio, here's a raise do it again!" does not seem like it would've been a logical response.
[quote who="seanw3" reply="22" id="3183360"]UbraAngel makes a terribly meaningless point. We are not mad because new influences drifted the games we loved. We are mad because EA took these franchises and crapped all over them with zero quality control. Go ahead and try to play C&C4. It is two games spliced together and neither well implemented because EA cut funding to both and then merged the teams, firing a few employees just before release and the whole rest of the team after. Great jo
they've had this problem since 2005 and still haven't fixed it? I wouldn't believe it if it was anyone but Dell [e digicons]:rolleyes:[/e] [e digicons]:rofl:[/e]
[quote who="Daiwa" reply="12" id="3185215"]Thanks for the link, Savyg. Hang in there with us. Some of us are trainable. [/quote] I love y'all, I'm just busy and irritable. The Secret World demands my attention!
http://windowsteamblog.com/windows/b/bloggingwindows/archive/2012/07/02/upgrade-to-windows-8-pro-for-39-99.aspx Probably deserves its own thread, but can't be arsed to participate on this forum much anymore.
[quote who="GFireflyE" reply="21" id="3179636"] If Win8 won't allow multiboot with winXP, I won't be getting Win8. Wow....that was surprisingly simple. [/quote] It will. You simply disable the secure boot feature. Assuming the vendor is following UEFI guidelines, it's that easy. Having an option for the user to disable it will not take away MS certification. While we're here. http://www.neowin.net/news/windo
Good lord people! THIS WAS NOT DESIGNED BY MICROSOFT. They are using an EXISTING security chain in UEFI to do this. They are not blocking out Linux by making their OS more secure. You should be able to disable UEFI Secure Boot on any machine (depending on the OEM) to install Linux. Making MS out to be the bad guy because they're using something already available to computers is retarded.
[quote who="velcro89" reply="16" id="3173679"]One year later... Ive owned a laptop with a 5650 for a few months. Id say the performace of the card is a fair bit greater than some people realise. Running Max Payne 3 on High-Very High Specs ( dx 9) @ 30 + FPS! Yes you have to lower the aa and anisotropic filtering, and the ati catalyst can be a temperamental piece of crap, but in then end its more than good enough to play games
[quote who="XATHOS" reply="184" id="3172865"] Talking about companies that solely publish, not people that also develop, as well. He's implying they're like leeches, and just shit on the little guy (from their experience, you always have exceptions to the rule).[/quote] Publishers certainly had their share of shifty business tactics in the 90s and still do somewhat today, but 90% of the time they're aboveboard now. Pretty much everyone knows what t
[quote who="XATHOS" reply="176" id="3172075"] So, you're trying to say is fuck publishers? Yeah, I can see that.[/quote] Considering they're a publisher...uhh...yeah, that's it, sure.
[quote who="Satrhan" reply="59" id="3168182"]Taxmoney is going to be spend on stuff you don't like, deal with it.[/quote] Yes it is, and thats why people vote on things. So that when people decide spending is wasteful they can stop paying it as a group...and some people are always going to bitch about whatever was stopped just as some people are always going to bitch about paying for it in the first place. Personally, if SETI had produced any results I'd see the
Now that I have it downloaded finally, it's a pretty decent game. Much better than you expect from an indie team so I'm wondering what their other games are like.