APPLEDONG?????? Where the hell did that come from? I must need another cup of coffee. Sorry bout that, apdelong. Cheers, Daiwa
Daiwa
appledong - That picture of Bush is great! Probably doctored, but great anyway. Cheers, Daiwa
she always looks like she has personality You should have seen this, Myrrander - the message on her face was "You so better lose, John Kerry. This is my last lunch." I wasn't really looking for this, it just looked really odd as it unfolded. And I really don't mean to pound on her, she looked how she
I wonder if there's a county where you have to do one of those "If you can draw this turtle you may have what it takes to become an artist" drawings? That would be mean.... <img src="../images/smiles/smile.gif" border=0 ALIGN="absmiddle"
Just caught some TV footage of Kerry & his wife having their "traditional" post-vote lunch at an oyster bar in Boston. Kerry was smiling, a bit animated & seemed at least somewhat upbeat. Thereza was absolutely stone-faced, wooden, seemingly distracted and just plain droopy, looking like she would have given anything to be anywhere but there. I supp
I'm not 100% sure, but I don't think the ballot is actually shredded, just damaged in such a way that it can't be put back through the vote-reader again. I don't think the ballot cards themselves are individually identifiable, at least our mail-in ballots were not. The signature is on the outside of the envelope which contains the affidavit of identity so that election officials can verify eligibility and make certain only one envelope per voter show
The euphoria of the Democrats will fade and give way to the biggest disillusionment ever to suffer the Democrat Party, parallel with the shame a girl would feel with sleeping with a creep to make her ex-boyfriend jealous. Gotta love that one. Cheers, Daiwa
T_Bone! What's Up? We agree! Yo, Bro! But why are we debating the opinion of an Aussie, with all due respect to Australia, a country with so much to recommend it? I don't believe we should be opining on PM Howard since we don't live there. I believe we should leave the Aussie's to make up their own minds about their internal politics without our meddling. And I would appreciate reciprocity. Just my opinion. Cheers,
Apparently, Deep Throat is still alive and feeding blogic. No other way I can think of to "know" all this stuff that can't be proven. Cheers, Daiwa
Grim & Zoomba - The 3rd party thing is interesting to me. Here in Arizona, Bednarik's ads seem to be targeted primarily at Bush, with an actor reciting a short litany of reasons not to vote for Bush and saying, almost in passing, that he "can't vote for Kerry." Technically, that's campaigning against both, but it sounds much more anti-Bush in the playing. Maybe in other states where Kerry is leading his ads are targeted at Kerry. Perhaps s
An amazing thing. I'm sitting here watching Bill O'Reilly's interview with Bush that took place prior to the first debate. Bush had no foreknowledge of the questions & handled them with aplomb & confidence, even tough ones about "Mission Accomplished" and the "divider vs. uniter" question. Had Bush been anywhere close to as effective in the first debate, there'd be very little doubt about who would win tomorrow. Cheers, Daiwa</f
And we now know that Kerry commissioned a poll to figure out how best to respond to the "little gift". What a man of conviction & character. Cheers, Daiwa
Let me get this straight: You cite an article which claims an anonymous source says that Powell's friends are saying that Powell is saying. And that equals "Even Powell says"? Your logic is more convoluted & irrational than even I imagined. The expected leftist final pre-election onslaught is in full swing, even here at JU. Cheers, Daiwa
Tough choice, here, Brad - Good for game, bad for Bush. Bad for game, good for Bush. Hmm... This having been a year of remarkable surprises in many spheres, perhaps TPM is missing the boat. If I remember correctly, Howard went to the polls either in a dead heat or with a very narrow poll lead in Australia & came out with a rather comfortable win. We can always hope. Cheers, Daiwa
Myrrander - I do what I can to help stevendedalus out. Cheers, Daiwa
he'll hitch his dwarfed star to anything to sell copy Kinda like.... Kerry, to get votes? Cheers, Daiwa
Kerry is not very offensive in his campaign, it may be costing him a lot of votes, but really it shows that he is not as ruthless as other politicians and may be wanting an honest change. Considering what a dishonest, offensive and ruthless politician he is, that's gonna be a tough sell. Cheers
Maybe not diplomacy with the terrorists, but better relations with the UN and our allies, which Bush has alienated. Just who has alienated who, my friend? For my money, the French, Germans and few others have alienated me , thank you very much, not to mention the schemers at the UN who would love
The video ya'll talking about only shows seals, not what's behind them. Although I haven't seen confirmation of it, it appears likely that the presence of an IAEA seal meant that the bunker housed materials either capable of being utilized in the production of WMD or so highly explosive as to merit iden
See what happens when government gets too deep into micromanaging healthcare? The nightmare only gets worse the more we try to "fix" it. Cheers, Daiwa
T_Bone - That confirms that at least one of the bunkers (somewhere) had a seal with a series of numbers that "a former IAEA inspector" says he "remembers" being used at Al Qaqaa. Another unattributed source without definitive confirmation. Very thin substantiation, if you ask me. Can't the IAEA give us the specific numbers for comparison? That would be helpful. Let's go ahead and concede, for purposes of argument, that the video i
It is very sad that partisan politics can actually be used to hide the enormity of this situation on both sides. Neither side actully seems to care that a dirty nuclear bomb could now be assembled by terrorists, they are too focussed on how they can spin this to gain votes. You are quite wrong, there, S
You are defending "freedom of speech" for companies, the cost of which is then passed on to consumers. An awfully big industry (advertising and all the dominoes further down the chain) would be out of work quick if that "freedom of speech" were denied. Nothing's ever as simple as it seems. Che
Congress is really the problem, along with the immutable law of unintended consequences. Over the past 16-18 years my industry has seen an incredible proliferation of unfunded regulatory mandates that have driven my overhead from about 50% to nearly 70% of gross revenue and had the effect of denying access to previously-available revenue streams. That's partly due, also, to the fact that my industry has price controls which have prohibited me
It's just a Pentagon tactic to try and "muddy the water" enough to create doubt. T_Bone - The Pentagon didn't try to "muddy the water," the truth of what the Army unit did inconveniently muddied the water. What they reported was absolutely factual and they didn't try to spin into someth