TasT

TasT

Joined Member # 171
2 Posts 26 Replies 25,548 Reputation

/me was thinking. Ya I know scary Maybe instead of having walls in the newest additions list there should be a Newest walls list or a link to a page that shows the 25 newest walls with thier stats........ One of those should satisfy the wall lovers and keep walls out of the list....

21 Replies 11,423 Views

I am just wondering why when I upload a wall does it not show in the "newest additions" list? the wall in question are: Cerebration https://www.wincustomize.com/skins.asp?library=8&SkinID=17707 Meanie https://www.wincustomize.com/skins.asp?library=8&SkinID=18429 I am a level four user and a journeyman so I have instant post privileges. btw if I remember correctly when I upload a WB skin it shows up in the new list. If my wall are that bad just tell me

21 Replies 11,423 Views

I agree with mack those of us that have been faithfull to stardock are feeling squeezed. We renew are subscription every year and are happy to alpha and beta test your software and report the bugs ( note: We don't fuss about them like most others would, we just report them) and applaud you when the bugs are fixed. Stardock does update most of the ODNT software regularly but it's normally DX, Skinstudio, WB and IP, the ones that draw people to Stardock to begin with or in skinstudio's c

73 Replies 35,034 Views

When a WB skin is downloaded your browser should ask if you want to open it and if so WBload will unzip and install the skin and even give you a popup asking if you would like to apply the skin.. Stardock has improved the accessability of the app by leaps and bounds over the last couple of years.

73 Replies 35,034 Views

BTW looks like some great retention rates Also the power user bundle sounds like a great Idea. Another reason I like ODNT is Stardock central, I love being able to start up one app and know if my software has been updated, that's one reason I don't like the not attached apps. even though they show up in SDC I always seem to mess them up somehow? <img src="http://images.stardock

73 Replies 35,034 Views

Froggy, Someone above said there should be different levels of ODNT and that my friend is an excellent Idea. I would have no problem dropping another 5-10 bucks a year to get the extra programs. Then for those who want the standard SD suite (known set of appps with no additions) leave the price the same. Look at it this way you get free beta and alpha tester like with ODNT. And also you'll have a way of enticing subscribers to move up a level. Also we won't ever have this conversa

73 Replies 35,034 Views

Syonin Says "When I say OD+ should be apart of ODNT it has nothing to do with the price. I have gladly paid for just about everything Stardock has done since 1998-9. It's about 2 or 3 of my favorite pieces of ODNT getting barely any inovative changes in about 2 years, and out comes some seperate product that does everything I wanted in both the CC/TLP. Either go back to CC/TLP and get them some nice inovative features or have OD+ replace them in ODNT. " TasT Agrees. I'm all for sta

73 Replies 35,034 Views

I could really care less about OD+ but it still does bug me that it wasn't added to ODNT. Mainly because when CursorXP was added to stardock the excuse for not adding it to ODNT was that it was not a productivity enhancing app. Here with OD+ we have an app that is much like Tab launch pad On roids. But instead of making it an upgrade to TLP it becomes a seperate app. I have supported stardock since near the start of ODNT even bought a wincusto account that I never use ( don't like th

73 Replies 35,034 Views