vernment (make it more militaristic as you plan on expanding for example). Paul.
Solitair
ing of modules(cost and production required). The computer then builds the required constructors and sends them to those starbases as required. Paul
players then don't spends large quantities of time mamaging those routes. Paul.
cular large battle with the Drengin fleet your scientists analyse the battle and think they see a weakness. They suggest research into a new wepon type (or tactic). Paul.
techs (instead of pre-requisites), if they have any. This way it's clear to a player that if they research tech X fist, tech Y will be easier to research. Paul.
new colonies should not be allowed as it also encourages the colony rush. A more balanced expansion is definitely what I would like to see. Paul.
e especially important if multiple identical trade routes reduced the value of each trade, as you don't want the human player to have to waste time calculating values. Just choose. Paul.
population and you may want different size ships for different tasks. Paul.
Looking good. The resolution scalability will definitely be a bonus, especially as the windows then allow more information. Does this mean we can play the game without it needing to be full screen? Paul.
nvade or colonise. Paul.
the fun factor. Paul.
o change the starbase spacing. Beta testing will tell. Paul.
bonus' don't reach stupid levels where a race gets +825% bonus to production on a planet. Paul.
reality! Paul.
Anyone familiar with the situation knows that they changed the definition ??? Where do you get that from? Is it a completely baseless personal opinion or do you actually have some legal reasoning behind this accusation? The whole point of the five member panel was to determine if the atrocities in Sudan
romanagement above the current level. Paul.
planets. It's how trade works in reality and also manages to minimise micromanagement. Paul.
so they change the definition No they didn't. They would have had to have re-written the legal law to do what you want. That's the whole point, they applied the law as currently written. You condemn them for suppos
Did they give their victims "due process"? What victims?!?!?!? There is no proof of any wrong doing by these people or else there wouldn't be this problem. They would have been chargd, tried and convicted (of the proof existed). This is the problem. You assume they are guilty without
This allows for a system where a player can actually compete and dominate through focussing on trade. Paul.
f micromanagement. Not an easy task, but one that would be very worthwhile. Paul.
gies or to possibly build race specific buildings on non-colonisable tiles. This would elave all planets useful to all races but allow certain races gain additional development space from the right sorts of planet tile. Paul.
I'd agree that any addition of orbital bombing would have to be done in a way to stop super fleets of planet bombers. So many games are ruined by the huge fleet bomb planet and move on end game. Paul.