I didn't put words in anyone's mouth. Did you happen to notice the question marks at the end? I'm asking him if that's what he believes.
davad70
Apparently liberals are no longer the only ones who are tiring of Ann Coulter's sick "sense of humor". It appears that her comment regarding poisening Justice Stevens was going too far. Even people who rationalize and defend her comments as satire, should have issues with her claiming to be a "devout, faithful Christian" and making comments like she does. The
I read something a while back that asserted that of the 5 senses, smell was most closely tied to the parts of the brain that provide memory recall. I certainly am not familiar with the scientific specifics of it, but I remembered doubting it at the time. Maybe I just haven't come across that many smells that really took me back, but it's always seemed to me
This isn't directly related to your post. I saw the link to your audioblog. While I don't agree with most of what you say there, I wanted to let you know I thought you did very well. It was very nicely done.
There's a pretty good article today at WSJ.com about this. CIA-Leak Case May Hand War Critics Momentum, But Legal Issues Are Slim By ANNE MARIE SQUEO and JOHN D. MCKINNON WASHINGTON -- The disclosure that Vice President Dick Cheney may have authorized his former chief of staff to release classified information to justify the war in Iraq has political consequences for the White House, but the legal fallout may be muted. "The president can declassify anything," Wi
So it's all a lie? The court documents with the statements about Cheney from Libby are fake?
It's going to be really interesting to see if it truly plays out as you outline Baker. I could cite some polls that show that people don't trust the GOP in general these days, but people around here don't seem to take too kindly to those. So....we'll just have to wait and see.
Now you want to answer the question? I am tired and going to bed. After all, there is nothing here. As soon as you identify what the question is I'll be more than happy to.
Okay, but you still haven't answered the question. In none of your last statements say "anything" about him being indicted for anything even resembling leaking classified info. No one said he was indicted for leaking classified info. What's your point? <TABLE cellpadding=8 width="95%" align=center bgColor=#FFF394 class="mb-Body-Quote-Ta
The classless was not by me. Better recheck your history. In the time I've been around here, you are definitely the only one who has spoken of shitting on a user's mother's funeral. What promises are you referring
I have noticed you throw stuff out there with not a single fact to back up what you try to put forth. What exactly have I "thrown out there" without facts. That's particularly amusing coming from you. I don't think I've seen too many links in any of your posts. They seem to all be "Ramblings of a twi
I don't doubt he was attempting to make a point, I just think it was an unnecessarily hostile and trashy way to do it. Perhaps I'm just too "old school" and don't appreciate bringing people's mothers into arguments where it has no place. In addition, I think even in an online forum, people shouldn't say things to people that they wouldn't also say directly to their face.
I can hear the whining now: Had FEMA imposed rigid verification checks & made people show up tomorrow or next week or whenever with the proof, we'd be listening to the Ben-types squealing about the unconscionable delays in getting the poor victims the relief they deserved. The whiners just sit back & wait, then bitch about which
What part of some have made seems incomprehensible? And where do you see me saying that you've personally made such statements? Since you were quoting me and that was a response to a statement I made, I thought it was directed at me personally....my apologies. <img src="http://images.stardock.com/JU/sm
Ok, that is a good point. Where can I shit on your mothers funeral? You are definitely one classless individual to make a statement like that. What's the matter buddy....too much pent up rage against your mean, spiteful, dumb boss? Need to do another "rant" to get it out? <TABLE cellp
Call it a pre-emptive strike against the generic "Bush hates all black people" type messages that most would anticipate, and which some have made. If you can show me any statement I've personally ever made around here that even remotely resembles that...that would be great. If not, I'd appreciate you a
Bombardment? Please give links and attibutions. I am breathlessly waiting to see this. It will be a good show. What are you talking about? Waiting breathlessly? You really don't have much of a life do you?
"Bombarded"? Two threads are a bombardment? As opposed to the probably 20 threads on the Muslim/Cartoon/Mohammed stuff. In my thread I never said that he did it to save his ass; "So yes, they did only leak a portion. It just so happens that in this instance, that the portions they leaked served to cast doubt on the credibility of Wilson." And since you want to start spouting legalese. He wasn't only indicted for pe
I was a Christian throughout most of my childhood...up until I was about 20. The contradictions in the Bible always drove me crazy . That was a minor issue involved with some major ones in deciding that I just didn't believe it any longer. I just couldn't get over the following contradiction; God is infallible, therefore the Bible is infallible as well because men wrote it with God guiding their hand and their hearts. If you accept that as fact, t
I'm curious where you get all your information from. I'm not doubting it, just curious and there are no links.
I'm seriously asking, but you better bring hard proof to your claims and not just conjecture. Bring it on if you want to make the blustery statements and accusations. I'll get back to you on this, but in the meantime would you kindly point me to any "blustery statements and accusations" I made.
Then do tell us what King stood for and how Bush's positions are different. Are you seriously asking, or are you trying to be funny?
I would think that since the anti-Bushites are the ones making the accusation, they'd have to prove that the Bush administration didn't officially sign off on it. I don't happen to have access to that information, but as I said above, I'm sure it will come out in the trial. <img src="http://images.stardock.com/JU/smiles/Wink.gif" border=0 ALIGN="
Actually since they work for the president, there still is no case. Do you have some precedent or law that you can cite that states that anyone who works for the President is auth
LOL... your girls are beautiful, Davad... and inbloom's right -- they got ya smile! Thanks HC