Cheap shot? In his own words? he was asking Alito why he could discuss the right of free speech, vs the right of privacy! Alito answered "because one is enumerated, and the other inferred". out of Context? You do try to spin! badly I might add! Dr. Guy, would you please show me where
He gets more credit than clueless Leahy who had to ask Alito where the right to Free speech was! I know it's hard for you to resist, but that was a very cheap shot at Leahy. He was not asking that question in the context that you're framing it.
NSA critics should pry open their minds and at least attempt to absorb the entirety of what he had to say. To be clear, I'm not saying that there is not a necessity for this type of surveillance. If someone here in the US is chattin it up with terrorists, I want the govt. to know about it. I just don't accept that they have to go about it in this backdoor way like they have, when they already had a legal means to do the exact same th
Who does the Constitution say has the power to declare war? Who does the Constitution say is the Commander in Chief? Where in the Constitution does it define how a war is to be waged? You still didn't answer my question.
And sorry to say that the legal standard is not "just" probable cause when it comes to getting a warrant. So the questioner does not have all the info. Still waiting on your response for this one regarding the legal standard in FISA cases being anything other than probable cause, Drmiler.
he got you. While the Amendment does contain the clause of "probable cause", he was never asked if that was part of the 4th amendment. And the General is correct. The Interviewer was the doofus here. It's really sad that a person like yourself, who considers himself "well read" and a patriot would read
I read that Kim will be back at some point this season. Let's hope it's brief.
It's called "time constraints"! Usually when they get a tip like that they do not have the luxury of putzing around! What time constraints? They don't have to wait for the judge to rule before they act, they just have to go back and show probable cause to get the warrant after the fact. That's one of
And btw....the guys info is incorrect. Except for the part where he denies that it says probable cause; QUESTION: But does it not say probable -- GEN. HAYDEN: No . The amendment says -- <TABLE cellpadding=8 width="95%" align=center bgColor=#FFF394 class="mb-Body-Q
Could you please explain how Leahy's resolution exhibits a lack of knowledge of the Constitution?
Check out General Hayden, head of the NSA display his vast knowledge of the 4th Amendment; QUESTION: Jonathan Landay with Knight Ridder. I'd like to stay on the same issue, and that had to do with the standard by which you use to target your wiretaps. I'm no lawyer, but my understanding is that the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution specifies that you must have probable cause to be able to do a search that does not violate an American's ri
On MSNBC's Countdown show on Wednesday night, while host Keith Olbermann attacked Atlanta-based syndicated conservative radio talk show host Neal Boortz, a photograph of former Democratic Senator Max Cleland of Georgia was mistakenly displayed on-screen. Link Neal Boortz is rude, insensitive, and will probably offend you at some point during the show; and his listeners wouldn't have it any other way! We're not sure if it's h
You called him a conservative which even "you" admit he's not! Where did I admit that he's not? Are you saying that a Libertarian cannot be a conservative?
You choked on this one. I listen to Neal and he is not a conservative. I didn't "choke" on anything. I didn't say he was a Republican, he's a proclaimed Libertarian, although he falls in closer with Republicans than Democrats on most issues. I used him as an example that it's not only Liberals/Democra
Here is another relevant story; Bush administration eliminating 19-year-old international terrorism report By Jonathan S. Landay Knight Ridder Newspapers WASHINGTON - The State Department decided to stop publishing an annual report on international terrorism after the government's top terrorism center concluded that there were more terrorist attacks in 2004 than in any year since 1985, the first year the publicatio
Any credentials on that? Nope, no credentials on that other than common sense. What would you say the point of the war on terror should be?
If democracy spreads throughout that region of the world, everyone will be a winner I don't know that families of the 6,872 people who died last year would agree with you.
I'm pleased that there hasn't been another attack like 9/11 too. However, I don't think it can really be shown that this is the result of anything that the administration has done. Well, there was a crackpot they caught who thought he was going to take down the Brooklyn Bridge with a jackhammer. Thank God they caught him!
A few days ago, Karl Rove offered a preview Link of what will be the GOP's primary issue of focus in the 2006 elections; National Security. Bush and his cabal insist that the way the administration has prosecuted the War on Terrorism has made the world is a safer place. The whole point of "winning" the war is to decrease the number of terrorism
Can you please post the entire quote with a link? You are not very credible otherwise. Here is the quote from Newt, it's from the Washington Post on 10/20/94. Feel free to search through their archives to find it. “I clearly fascinate them,” Gingrich said of the Democrats. “I’m much more intense, much more persistent, much more willi
I'd be really interested to see all this pontificating you claim that I do without links. I very rarely tell you that you are wrong, mistaken, or lying without showing you evidence of such. You slammed me for posting a link and then commenting on the link. Are you talking about this thread? I
The offer of take my governor does not extend to Parated! I'd trade you any day. You can have Bush's lackey Mitch Daniels. The only thing in Indiana he's seemed especially concerned with so far is our time zone.
But before his inauguration, he did something very stupid! About the same brain power and the same mouth to boot.! So I started to think "Is this guy stupid ?". Well, I did not have to think long. He confirmed it! So I can safely say that Tim Kaine is a freaking idiot. A real dolt , and in the vein of Jery Gerry Baliles Kaine is more like Curly! Yep! A real stooge! He is wors
I'm not defending Jefferson, he's obviously a crook just like Delay. My point is that the story was not buried at all. The alleged charges against Delay are far more sweeping than the ones against Jefferson's aide. There's also the fact that Delay is a much higher profile Congressman than Jefferson. Therefore, it's understandable that there has been much more coverage of Delay. There are also other corruption stories with GOP Congressman that ha
Did it get anywhere near the coverage like Delay did? It did not, for a lot of reasons.
JoeUser Forums