This story, that has been buried , is a clear case of a Congressman out actively strong arming a company for cold hard cash. In what sense has this story been "buried"? It's been reported on CNN, MSNBC, Washington Post, New York Times, Louisville Courier-Journal, Cleveland Plain Dealer, R
davad70
Fast-forward a 140 years and we have Mrs. Clinton trying to argue that Republicans are like the slave holding planation owners because...they don't agree with the opinions of Democrats in congress? Point: First part -- "Fast-forward a 140 years..."; Second part -- "because... they don't agree...". The first par
"You love being wrong. The second part is fact, She said it. Or are you denying that? Are you now arguing they do agree? Let me make it easy for you. Prove it! Prove it as not fact." 1. Go to CNN. Read the article. Watch the video. 2. If the second part is fact, why isn't the "statement" quoted
I guess I will have to google the opinions, but I do agree with the ruling. As it was 6-3, I think (dont know) that it was more a finesse part of applying the law. Not a left right one, but again, not having read the ruling, I do not know. Majority Opinion <a href="http://scotus.ap.org/scotus/04-623p.
Yes, I have...they were surprisingly.....not bad. I also remember one of the performers (Marty Casey) on that reality show Rockstar INXS covering "Hit Me Baby One More Time", and it was great.
He isn't sorry he said it, he is just sorry that he is getting backlash over it. Ugh! I'm curious...can you read everyone's heart and mind or just his? His statements were ridiculous and irresponsible, but he did apologize and seemed sincerely apologetic to me.
Or Marilyn Manson singing "Islands in the Stream" Yuck! Dolly singing "Stairway to Heaven" would be like Nine Inch Nails covering "My Favorite Things".
I'm not sure if you'd consider Lugar a RINO, but surely not Graham and Brownback.
Col, how does that somehow validate your point? So what. Who is it? McCain or some other RINO? How about Sam Brownback? STEPHANOPOULOS: Are you confident that the administration has acted lawfully in this case? BROWNBACK: I think we need to hold hearings on it and we’re goin
Sorry Teddy, you are not going to get away with it here. As you can clearly see...Teddy is not my name. I've not resorted to your childish games of giving people nicknames. I could think of some cute ones for you if you want though. <TABLE cellpadding=8 width="95%" align=center bgColor=#FFF39
In a recent interview in the Washington Times, First Lady Laura Bush talked briefly about what she's currently listening to on her iPod; "One of the songs on my IPod that I love is Dolly Parton singing 'Stairway to Heaven.' So that's sort of a combination, country and pop." That's just wrong in so many ways!
I will admit that I've gotten testy and a little belligerent at times to a couple of them, but that's after being on the receiving end of insult after insult from them. I try to be nice to them, but it's oh so difficult.
By the way....the article quoted the text of the poll regarding making abortion illegal. The question asked in the poll is; "If you thought that Judge Alito, if confirmed, would vote to make abortions illegal, would you favor or oppose his confirmation?" So why fault them for that and not the pollsters? <a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB113631602732036724-NVQeq6nAnyaEKCswYTou97u4GzU_20070104.html?mod=blo
Just keep running your mouth and see how fast you get b/l accross the board. And if you say you don't really care, then by al means leave. What you've just said would be considered a personal attack! I was responding to the comment he made about me but, if anyone would know a "personal attack", it would
You like being wrong. You are as wrong, as the NY times! I will leave you to pick which one of the 3 you are. He cannot cast a vote to make it illegal. PERIOD. Play word games all you want, but someone would have to be mentally challenged to not be able to see the intent of what they were sa
You're seeing things that are not there. They weren't saying that he could, on his own, make abortion illegal. They're saying he would cast a vote to make it illegal. I think the average reader gets the gist of what they're saying. If they were implying that he could do it on his own they probably would have phrased it as "he would make it illegal".
You are just too much dm! You provide us with greatly needed comic relief.
"A person is guilty of an offense if he engages in a sexual act with another person, not his spouse, and: (1) compels the other person to participate: (A) by force; or (B) by threatening or placing the other person in fear that any person will imminently be subjected to death, serious bodily injury, or kidnapping; (2) has substan
Yeah I found it. So we're supposed to take his word as gospel when he has been shown to have a proclivity to stretch the truth? Well, if you could show any evidence to the contrary I'd be more than happy to take a look. It might take me 3 times reading it to comprehend it, but I'll give it a shot. <img src="http://images.stardock.com/JU/smiles/
but don't let me interfere with your determination to morph yourself into your own worst enemy by continuing to spread the big lie. Come on kb, you know truth and reality have no standing with him and his ilk. Why bother with silly old concepts like those when you can rely on smears and lies?
I read it 2 times and could find no references about that. Did you find it yet drmiler?
What would that be? New post-reunification German coin? A German you don't like? Or just a German douchebag, maybe? How'd you know he was German, anyway? That's the funniest thing I've read here in a while. Good one Daiwa! <img src="http://images.stardock.com/JU/smiles/Laugh.gif" bo
Thanks Def.
Actually that's not what I asked. Is there any evidence that their actions and words have caused anyone harm? It's "EXACTLY" what you asked for. Causing an American soldiers death with his words by inciting violence comes directly under the heading of causing harm to someone. Do you really
Well if your all about truth and the reporting of it....please refer to your link and "show" me where it says that Echelon went through the FISA court? I read it 2 times and could find no references about that. We do not collect against US persons unless they are agents of a foreign power, as that te