davad70

The Truth About FISA & Zacarias Moussaoui in War on Terror JoeUser Forums

There have been many people writing and talking recently regarding the the case of Zacarias Moussaoui. As a refresher; Zacarias Moussaoui (born May 30, 1968) is a French terrorist of Moroccan descent involved in the conspiracy that resulted in the September 11, 2001 attacks. He was taken into custody by the Federal Bureau of Investigation in on August 16, 2001 after attending a flight school in Minnesota where an instructor expressed con

Reply to Constitutional Scholars, please reply in Politics JoeUser Forums

Now why dont you post that over there? I did post that over there. And then you called me a liar. Which you did not back up. Again showing that you do not know how to deb

Reply to Constitutional Scholars, please reply in Politics JoeUser Forums

Then why dont you repost it so that Little whip can see? As the others? You dont remember do you? That is ok. I do remember very well what I posted. I did post it after all. You're MO tells me that you would just claim that's not what I wrote originally anyways, so why bother? <TABLE cellp

Reply to Constitutional Scholars, please reply in Politics JoeUser Forums

Why not let us see the comments of the person you are slamming here and accusing of being a liar, DrG? That's not gonna happen.

Reply to Constitutional Scholars, please reply in Politics JoeUser Forums

I deleted the rest of your response because it was insulting and off point, as I explained. I quoted the only printable part. Clean up you act, or honor your promise your choice. What exactly did I lie about? If I had done anything inflammatory or more insulting than the part you quoted you certainly

Reply to Constitutional Scholars, please reply in Politics JoeUser Forums

Why not let us see the comments of the person you are slamming here and accusing of being a liar, DrG? Basically he's referring to me making a comment a while ago that I would ignore him in the future and then not doing so. Oh, the shame...the horror! I'm the worst kind of liar! <img src="ht

Reply to Constitutional Scholars, please reply in Politics JoeUser Forums

It's pretty distasteful to delete my reply, but then quote part of it. In effect, you've edited my own post. Therefore I asked you to remove reference to me on your blog.

Reply to Once Burned, Twice Warned in Current Events JoeUser Forums

And you lied. You told me over a month ago you were going to ignore my blog. Yet like a gadfly you persist in trying to tell me how to write and what to write. So I can only conclude that you are a liar. I don't tell you how to write, and as far as what to write all I have asked is that you write thi

Reply to Constitutional Scholars, please reply in Politics JoeUser Forums

You have proved no such thing. I did reply to this...that's the part you deleted. Since you asked me to reply and then deleted it then please take my name off your blog.

Reply to Thanks in advance Charles Schumer... in Politics JoeUser Forums

I watched the interview myself. Schumer did not say that the abortion issue in and of itself would cause a filibuster. He clearly said that if Alito refuses to answer questions on several issues then filibuster would be considered.

Reply to Once Burned, Twice Warned in Current Events JoeUser Forums

It isn't "my opinion" that the FISA Court never rejected a warrant in theis case, it is fact. The FBI presented the case to DOJ and they decided not to seek a warrant from FISA. So how exactly can you say that the court rejected the request when one was never made? That's clearly a lie. You imply that perhaps the judge resigned in shame. Shame for what? If there was a problem in this case, it lies with DOJ and not with the court, as you state. Y

Reply to The Media Lied? in Current Events JoeUser Forums

Well, since you just lied in your response to me, I can only feel that I have a lot more credibility than you. And since your book is on the level of "Dick and Jane", I guess I will have to learn to live with that disappointment. Very typical...rhetoric instead of facts. I'm not surprised.

Reply to Abramoff: A 'Republican' Fund Raiser? in Politics JoeUser Forums

Ted... What that article doesn't tell you is whether those contributions came from Abramoff personally or his clients. If you dig a little deeper you find that all that money was from clients, not from him personally...just as KB stated.

Reply to Are Members of Congress guilty of TREASON? in Politics JoeUser Forums

I guess we'll know for sure when he's up for re-election.

Reply to Are Members of Congress guilty of TREASON? in Politics JoeUser Forums

25 protest lawmaker's stance on troop withdrawal ** They also object to Fitzpatrick's vote to cut social programs. [SECOND Edition] Morning Call - Allentown, Pa. Author: Hal Marcovitz Of The Morning Call Date: Dec 15, 2005 Start Page: B.1 Section: LOCAL Document Types: LOCAL Text Word Count: 537 Abstract (Document Summary) The anti-war protest was organized by a group of Bu

Reply to Are Members of Congress guilty of TREASON? in Politics JoeUser Forums

No, I'm not a resident of PA, but that does not preclude me from being able to read newspapers from Pennsylvania. Are you saying the letters the newspapers have received have been from themselves and not from the residents of his district? While more than 80 percent of phone calls, faxes, letters, and e-mails to Murtha's office support his stance, the flood of letters at the Tribune-Democrat newspaper in Johnstown, is more evenly split. "T

Reply to Are Members of Congress guilty of TREASON? in Politics JoeUser Forums

not to pick nits but he speaks for the people of his district , he was speaking not as John Murtha private citizen but as John Murtha CONGRESSMAN,and that is what makes it WRONG. That's exactly my point. He IS speaking for the people of his district. The majority of his district apparently supports hi

Reply to Are Members of Congress guilty of TREASON? in Politics JoeUser Forums

I think what Murtha did undermines the war on teror only because he is an elected representative and speaks for thousands of people. Members of Congress (and We the People) o

Reply to The Media Lied? in Current Events JoeUser Forums

Davad, try using something other than a blog for your idiocy! geez, why dont you use my blog? it is as reputable! And with more documentation! The blog is a summary of 6 articles...which are all linked within the blog. Just as reputable? Surely you jest! This blog is written by accomplished writers, not a person like you who needs t

Reply to Conservatives Fight Illegal Bush Action in Politics JoeUser Forums

One more Republican conservative Sam Brownback speaks out regarding the wiretapping issue; From ABC's This Week; STEPHANOPOULOS: Are you confident that the administration has acted lawfully in this case? BROWNBACK: I think we need to hold hearings on it and we’re going to. Both in the intelligence committee, there will be closed hearings and then the judiciary committee will have open hearings. I think we need to look at this case and this issue. I am troubled

Reply to The Media Lied? in Current Events JoeUser Forums

You guys are always complaining about how liberals and the media blame Bush for everything. It was singrdave who chose to bring Bush into this, no one else.

Reply to The Media Lied? in Current Events JoeUser Forums

If President Bush, when discussing the war in Iraq, relied on sources of information that were inaccurate, but no one knew at the time were inaccurate Actually there is pretty considerable evidence that Bush knew some of the intel was bad. There's no evidence that the media knew what they were reporting was false. Murray Waas, writing in the National Journal, breaks new information regarding the level of knowled

Reply to Poll Favoring Dems Means Little in Politics JoeUser Forums

This was uncalled for! "If" you "read" the entire post you would have seen him asking if anyone had any details. Lighten up, it was a joke.

Reply to Secret Court unaware of Bush Eavesdropping in Politics JoeUser Forums

You're very clearly twisting the intent of the 72 hour window. Since we "are" dealing with US security it "should" be the NSA doing it. Evidently you can't read either! Show me where it says court orders are required for roving taps. The court can demand all it wants. Between FISA and it's amendments and the patriot act, GW is required to tell them nothing unless