Ashbery76

Reply to Game Mechanics Work Really Really Well If You Increase Maintenance and Research Costs in Galactic Civilizations III GalCiv3 Forums

When you get so much money that building never ending ships number make the game feel like a RTS and not a 4x..At the moment is it just about how fast you build ships rather than how many you can afford.Economy is not balanced.

Reply to The GalCiv III wishlist thread in Galactic Civilizations III GalCiv3 Forums

1.Tech brokering 2.Fleet list instead on ships. 3.UI improvements. 4.A.I 5.More political options.

Reply to Goodbye super Sensor wagons.... in Galactic Civilizations III GalCiv3 Forums

It was common sense and why the devs ignored it before release is a mystery.Maybe just stubborn.

Reply to Disable surrendering? in Galactic Civilizations III GalCiv3 Forums

I think this hurts the game narrative.Why would anybody surrender whole planets to the Drengin when they eat and enslave you.

Reply to Why don't missle ships stay out of range. in Galactic Civilizations III GalCiv3 Forums

[quote who="TS22" reply="62" id="3552378"] I don't really need or care for tactical battles. I just would like the current system to make sense. With range and speed being featured aspects of a ship and weapon type, it is illogical for combat ships to not fully utilize their range/speed advantage. As others have mentioned above, perhaps range should be taken out until it is fully fleshed out by the developers. Combat speed (ie thrusters) could

Reply to GalCiv III: Interesting stats in Galactic Civilizations III GalCiv3 Forums

I think players do not like cheat buffed A.I's.

Reply to Sabotage Stealthy Race like the Romulans?? in Galactic Civilizations III GalCiv3 Forums

No.

Reply to Why don't missle ships stay out of range. in Galactic Civilizations III GalCiv3 Forums

It seem this system was just thrown in half baked and I'm not sure ever the devs know what is going on.Many games have hands off tactical combat that allows for many viable designs,GBS,Dominions and even EndlessSpace made more sense than what I am seeing here. Luckily for them the reviewers gave them a pass on this.

Reply to Abusing minor races? in Galactic Civilizations III GalCiv3 Forums

I don't think they add anything to the game apart from being something to screw over.Another thing from GC2 that have not been developed at all.

Reply to Modder Wishlist in GalCiv III Modding GalCiv3 Forums

I would like to be able to flag some techs to be untradeable.

Reply to Galactic Civilizations firsts in PC Gaming GalCiv3 Forums

[quote who="Frogboy" reply="11" id="3550498"] Quoting TheRealWarpstorm, reply 6 Not true, Brad. CK2 had every count in Europe as an individual player trying to succeed. (More if you count the other nobles scheming or waiting for their liege to die) -- I don't remember how many could play in MP, but it was less.

Reply to Bug - Forcing Tech Specializations Through Gifting in GalCiv III Support GalCiv3 Forums

[quote who="sweatyboatman" reply="8" id="3550442"] Trading for "specializations" doesn't make sense (and, like full galaxy sensor boats, I see it as cheating and I don't do it in my games). What they should do, IMO, is make specializations a tradeable resource . You can trade for the specialization buff for 50 turns (or until war is declared) and after the time runs out it needs to be renewed or the buff goes away. [/quote]

Reply to Why don't missle ships stay out of range. in Galactic Civilizations III GalCiv3 Forums

[quote who="Lightbanee" reply="1" id="3550439"] thrusters do have a purpose, they allow the ships to turn more quickly when they pass each other. [/quote] And what difference does that make.The ships fire at any angle an all stay in rail gun range.

Why don't missle ships stay out of range. in Galactic Civilizations III GalCiv3 Forums

They run straight towards the enemy at close range.What is point of thrusters if all ships just head towards point blank range, It's not logical Jim.

Reply to Sensor Range in Galactic Civilizations III GalCiv3 Forums

it's is pretty ridiculous to be honest and breaks the game.What is the point of station sensors,etc.

Reply to Krynn Are Now Completely Out Of Control in GalCiv Beta Feedback GalCiv3 Forums

They dominated my first game.The problem is they are possibly the least developed race in theme.I get no sense in what they are about.

Reply to Disappointed at the lack of female portraits in Galactic Civilizations III GalCiv3 Forums

Do not care.Women are making the leaders tea.

Reply to Not all weapons being used in GalCiv Beta Feedback GalCiv3 Forums

I am finding escorts do not fire at stations.

Reply to Galactic Civilizations firsts in PC Gaming GalCiv3 Forums

The EU games have over 100 tags for nations that could be in any game.

Reply to Galactic Civilizations firsts in PC Gaming GalCiv3 Forums

Paradox would not agree with 12.

Reply to Large empires & micromanagement hell in GalCiv Beta Feedback GalCiv3 Forums

I do not think planet building games suit large star counts and I'm a bit surprised they are putting resources into immense sizes.You need a different design ala DistantWorlds mechanics.

Reply to A.I Warning me to stay out of his ZOC when it is the one with a bunch of stuff in my ZOC. in Galactic Civilizations III GalCiv3 Forums

It is very annoying that the A.I has political options the player does not have.

Reply to some more Custom Game options on game start in GalCiv Beta Feedback GalCiv3 Forums

Agreed.No tech brokering is very missed.

Reply to Sensor ships and concerns about the AI not using them in Galactic Civilizations III GalCiv3 Forums

The A.I building them and actually using them for their purpose is not the same.

Reply to What's the word on the ship battles? in GalCiv Beta Feedback GalCiv3 Forums

The early beta battles looked MUCH better as the ships were at much longer range.It looked epic Now they start too close together.It looks stupid like in GC2..