" If the vote were held today, do you believe it would pass? You bet your ass it would not." Obviously not. Not because they gave more of a damn one way or the other about Iraq, but because their pollsters and analysts would tell them to vote the other way. You're deluded if you think they give a damn about anything else.
nm again.
nm
nm... I'm done. I removed my article. Taking the high road...
Well, you aren't coming at this from the perspective of organized religion. You know, big buildings with big electric bills with lots of people to pay? The thing changes where people start making PAYCHECKS, feeding themselves and their families based upon the religion. Then, when the pews aren't full, neither are your pockets. When the church down the road, even if it is the same overall religion, starts to leech members away from you, you have to distinguish yourself. Heavens, too,
Yes, it pisses me off.
It makes me mad "and then the rednecks arrived". If you look closely at the people in the back of that truck there were women and kids. Those people hadn't been called there, it was a store, they were probably going for ice cream. I don't believe a single damn rock was ever really thrown. They don't show it. I've seen correspondents sit under fire and get film. It's too damned convenient that they couldn't get an ounce of anything on tape. The idiots at Digg are all up in
It's bullshit. You see one, maybe two people antagonizing them, and it appeared to be the business owner who didn't want to have them sitting there with the bullshit on their cars. The crap with the pointing the camera at the ground, going to "radio", etc., is smoke and mirrors. The piece of shit that did the article about it online talks about his cultured "california" Americans... well, I could suggest a few spots he could ride through LA or Oakland after *I* had painted
"They were afraid to be put into a position of either telling the truth or lying and risking jail time." With pissy, vindictive people who take advantage of any slip of the tongue to charge you with perjury? Who wouldn't take a pass on that. This "investigate a crime, prosecute misstatements during the investigation" garbage was boring with Clinton, and every time it gets more boring. Now I think they just fish hoping someone will forget some detail o
"Baker; These are heavy equipment, machinery, and heavy vehicle auctions, but the idea still applies." Yep, lol, they may not be metrosexual, but those manly, he-man construction worker types are just as anal about their toys. LOL
Not sure what kind of auction it was, but shipping auction items is a big insurance scam way too often. Delivery people have no way to verify condition when they pick it up, but they are definitely the ones always blamed if it doesn't GET THERE intact. God forbid the metrosexual fek on the other end gets his faux 18th century new england clawfoot PoS with a scratch on the bottom of the front left foot...
"ANSWER TO ALL THESE IS NEVER!!!!!!!!" So when you are shown that Bush's excuse for the war was shared by people you refuse to condemn, you shift. If I address, again, what you shift to, you'll shift to the economy and oil revenues. Then it will be his military service. Then it will be back to the reasons for the war. Te Nosce, Col. This isn't about what Bush does, this is about Bush.
The problem is that since the basics are often the same, they have to distinguish themselves with the tertiary ideas. They want to convert people to their flavor of religion, or sub-flavor, so they have to differentiate with the small stuff. This leads to the small stuff becoming all-important.
Clinton also hyped that threat, and used it as an excuse for Operation Desert Fox. They even said that Hussein's abilities in 1998 were so widespread that there was no hope of destroying it all.
It's the 'traitor' mentality, much the same reason that bin Laden hates the Saud family.
"And what about France? It is pretty close to have a birth rate of 2 and it is experiencing a many baby boom since year 2000 (between 700 000 and 8000 000 birth per year)" Thanks to the influx of immigrants who receive little respect or regard.
About a year ago the old Algerian terrorist group that used to attack France swore allegiance to al Qaeda. Rumor is they will resume attacking France in the near future.
MMkay. Evidently you only read the posts that are directed at you. I've grilled Lula a lot, but hey, whatever makes your persecution complex valid for you.
So gays that have been together for years should not recieve any benefit? Again, you seem to be saying the relationships aren't equal and somehow gay love stops at sex, so gays dont deserve rights. Should they? That would be up to the people of the state to decide. If a state wanted to stop licensing any marriage at all it would be within their rights. You seem to be saying that there is some written rule somewhere that relationships are equal. Could
You're serious. You don't see me being critical of Lula's arguments here at JU? Talk about a selective memory...
"If gay sex is not a problem for society how can you say it is not a valid practice to sanction?" Are you talking about sex or marriage? I thought we were talking about marriage. I said that people have the right to choose what their government licenses. "How can people say a homosexual relationship can be full of love, respect, and everything else in a heterosexual relationship, but when it comes to marriage all of
"It's not me that's skipping scripture and you know that. " She doesn't "skip" that scripture, she just interprets it as not applying to the situation. "Well your comment says you're an equal opportunity basher but I see you as only bashing me....maybe I'm missing something? " LOL, no, I don't bash Lula, heavens, who'd think that...
"Please tell me why this is... what non-religious reason do people have to vote against this?" Insurance, government benefits, divorce, adoption, etc., etc. Just because people don't think gay sex is a problem for society doesn't mean they think gay marriage is a valid practice for society to sanction. People don't have a religious problem with illegal immigration, but you'll find a lot of people have a problem with opening the floodgates in terms of
"When was the last time you saw a poor person with 2 computers, wireless broadband, satellite on 2 TV's, 3 TV's, 3 DVD players, a full fridge, gas in my tank?" In America it is common. That's because we judge what "poverty" is simply by tagging that word onto a big hunk of the bottom percent of our economy. It's a sliding scale. It's like saying "the idiots" in a room full of geniuses. Sure, there will be 20% that have the lowest IQs, but none of the
Where exactly do you have Christ's writings about anything? You have what your church fathers said that he said, but then they picked what they picked because they felt it bolstered the truth of their doctrine. What didn't, they left out.
JoeUser Forums