davad70: As president of the Ingrate and Troublemaker's union Local: WC, I must inform you that unless you pay your dues and carry a union card you are not, actually, an ingrate and troublemaker. You may, of course, be an ingrate OR a troublemaker, but performing both tasks simulateously is strictly a unionized form of labor.
bakerstreet
Know what you are going to make *before* you make it; and never, ever go to a tutorials page for inspiration.
re: LS, wtf? rtfm. lol How many of Jafo's posts could be refined to that...
Life is difficult. Once you completely understand that... it becomes simple.
heya. anytime someone says 'greetings' I think of Marvin the Martian. I immediately attatch 'earthling' to the end of it. Overlook me...
no oops required, your link is a bit more to the point
My handle will remain Bakerstreet, which is not quite as colorful as my godgiven name "Funkolicious69", but I tend to understate things, as everyone knows... I like Aqua; pretty popular nick online I bet, though. "Cold" things tend to be popular in the techy nickname department as well, I never understood why.
There is a WMP developer SDK. When they first started 7 they had a lot of video you could download and watch from the developers themselves, I dunno if they offer it now. I dunno how the SDK will change with 9.0, either. here's a link to the MSDN page: ( http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnwmt/html/WMPlayer_9_SDK_Intro.asp ) I think you will find that there is no set way to make a skin for it. It is about as open-ended a format as you will find
Delicious: Of course I'm on the favorite list, and my farts smell like roses. I do want the code for that automatic, art-critic server script, though. I think it is often the australian program they use for spell checking.
You mean my opinion has no bearing unless it is a anonymous, numeric opinion, right? lol... reread my post. High download numbers mean nothing, only that people have downloaded it. And you as much as anyone should know how much number ratings mean. Come on, your conversation is up there for everyone to see. I would rather have a single appreciative email from a user than a 10 rating any day. I would give your reasoning [Rating: 4] I'll stick to replying to you with
quoted from a post I made on another string: "Downloads are meaningless as well. People can't judge a piece until they have used it. I would rather have ten downloads that stayed on the desktop for a month than a million that went straight to the recycle bin. Sure, I want people to use what I offer, but I would be silly to think that a tenth of the people who download what I make ever actually do. Anyone who thinks about their work, spends time on it, and is proud enough to upl
I think anyone that spends more than a glance pondering their 'ratings' is wasting their time. 10='I love it' 1='this sucks' If people can't string a few meaningful thoughts together about something, then the number they rate it at is meaningless. I kind of notice the first rating I get, because I know where that comes from. Ratings beyond that, I couldn't care less, since I also *know* where they come from. I'm really not gonna lose sleep if someone doesn't like something
lmao... you guys... look back to the root cause of the thread and ask yourselves if this really, really merits discussion. I think we know these two well enough now to take them with a huge grain of salt. Well, more of a boulder of salt. I mean come on; the outrage is over the fact that padding one another's rating isn't 'sticky'. This is not the perspective on which to base change at any level.
too cute
If you go by the general flow of the site, no. I'm 99% positive all the app icons here weren't made after receiving permission. I think the policy is that you are using whatever icon you make *for* that app, so it is 'fair use' (wink wink, nudge nudge). So if you are asking if it is okay to put app icons in your suites, i'd say *here* yes, but technically, no. You're still making derivative work from someone else's graphics without expressed permission. The icon sections of most sit
30,000 downloads of a 10k html file is 300,000k, or roughly 300 megs. What the real problem is, though, is thousands of useless hits every three minutes. Doesn't really matter if it is 1k or 100, paying for a pipe that would allow tens of thousands of people to connect to your site simulatenously isn't gonna make you happy, especially if many/most are never seeing your content or clicking your ads. It really makes a small-time webmaster think twice about opening up an rss feed. the slashdot
As far as I know all weather apps leech weather info from someone. It is possible that some of the payware weather apps pay for the priviledge, but I know how most of the freeware apps work, and they are solidly leeching; sometimes a 10k page just to parse our 5 or 6 characters. I know that some news/monotoring apps outside this community have been threatened. One, which shall remain nameless, had default settings to poll some news/weather sites every 3 minutes, and 20 or 30,000 peopl
re: skinz, etc., As with Jark, one never knows other's opinions til they are asked. I was told that skinz_org was fully aware of the situation in its 'brown' era; I can't answer for now. re: leeching. A leech wouldn't wait until the skinner sent a screenshot and a link. A leech would crawl the site for links periodically, and would most likely leech the screenshots as well. This isn't akin to mirroring the Talisman section. The links come from several different sites. Like
Mail bombing is certainly illegal. Mr. Sproat might, however, appreciate lots and lots of email referals to barnyard porn and multi-level business ventures. I mean, people who's emails are posted to newsgroups become very, very popular... or so I've heard. Mr. Sproat seems to be someone in dire need of popularity.
Sorry. I must've misinterpreted the line "If people didn't want people to break into their houses they'd put bars on their windows." If I put words in your mouth I apologize. No, I'm not saying your opinion is wrong; and I'm not really saying I would do what Lighttek is doing. On the other hand if I had been told it was okay in the past, and no one had bothered to tell be different since, I probably wouldn't feel the same. I don't think we differ on our view of the act itse
Frogboy: That would be a correct analogy only if breaking into houses was LEGAL. This is something that Google Image Search is doing every second of every day. Many major sites allow direct access to files on their servers. The precedent for direct downloading is clearly that it is legal. In those cases that it is not wanted, it is openly discouraged or prevented. Has either occurred here? This is something that Lighttek has been doing for at least three years,
1) Lighttek tells skinners to email them a screenshot and links to the themes *if* they want them shown on the Lighttek site. To my knowledge no themes are displayed, nor links posted, that weren't submitted to Lighttek by email directly from the skinner themselve. 2) I would assume if someone *didn't* want anything deep-linked they would inform the user therein not to go around doing so, at least in upload agreements. If people are heinously emailing Lighttek irresponsible links, the
If there isn't enough notification, perhaps WinCusomize/XPThemes should refer to Deviantart's submission agreement ( http://www.deviantart.com/policy/submission/ ), which has gone to great lengths to prepare the uploader for many, many unforseen options. Here is part of one section of their upload agreement, I have added line breaks for easier reading *cough*: 3. License to Use Artist Materials. Artist hereby grants to deviantART a worldwide, royalty-free non-exc
I would add that anyone who has a handgun properly prepared to defend themselves in the US is probably in violation of law, or at least putting themselves in danger of liability. In many places guns are required to be in a locked container, with ammunition stored in a separate container. I would suggest strongly to anyone sleeping with a loaded gun in the dresser drawer to check their local gun laws. If you 'make it available' to someone who is gonna use it, even if they take it without your