Borg999

Borg999

Joined Member # 2363158
40 Posts 499 Replies 1,898 Reputation

[quote who="Borg999" reply="63" id="3386056"] Quoting Kantok, reply 61 Edit: Brad nailed her point more succinctly than I have only it's not between the lines. It's stated openly in much of the dialog. One of the main characters gives a 25 page speech on it. Quoting Kantok, reply 61 Brad and others have repeately used this forum to complain about

78 Replies 280,706 Views

[quote who="Frogboy" reply="59" id="3386025"] Quoting Borg999, reply 57 A lot of analysis of the "true meaning" of the book going on, but if you read between the lines, the true meaning of the whole thread is: The rich are worthy, the poor (and middle class) are not worthy. This is just another veiled argument for providing the wealthy with corporate welfare at the expense of education, infrastruture, tempoarary unemployme

78 Replies 280,706 Views

A lot of analysis of the "true meaning" of the book going on, but if you read between the lines, the true meaning of the whole thread is: The rich are worthy, the poor (and middle class) are not worthy. This is just another veiled argument for providing the wealthy with corporate welfare at the expense of education, infrastruture, tempoarary unemployment benefits, etc, etc.

78 Replies 280,706 Views

When I steal the soul of a champ that has a school of magic that I don't have, I gain that school of magic. But if I cast that spell on a champ that has a school that I already have, it appears I gain no benefit of any kind. For example, I would think if the champ had say, +2 attack from the general skills (that I didn't have), I would gain that. Is this correct, or a bug?

5 Replies 7,821 Views

[quote who="N1ghthavvk" reply="12" id="3383358"] Wel Borg999 that is a question.. The harsh reality hm? In my opinion even if there would be no more support I would still "occasionally" play this game, but that is just me. Of course I would really like further support and really the newest addition in our version numbers the 1.3 does hint that here will be more polishing (at least)[/quote] Yea, I think I'll be playing this game for a whil

15 Replies 57,465 Views

[quote who="TLamming" reply="22" id="3382047"] hmm, I always thought they could build the towers but not do the final spell of creation; I've never lost a game that way. Am I wrong?[/quote] Yes it can cast the som. An ai ally did it to me last game

47 Replies 183,602 Views

[quote who="mmorley" reply="2" id="3381542"] You didn't develop the technology (magic) to end the war, your ally did, so they win the game. [/quote] I understand what you're saying, but if I can't attack my allies to prevent them from contructing the towers, then that's a good reason not to form allegiances.

5 Replies 5,846 Views

[quote who="parrottmath" reply="3" id="3382017"]The idea is too exploitive and they might feel it is not worth the effort to produce such a feature. Of course with Call of the Titans you have a teleport artifact, by warping your entire champion army next to your other champion army. That means they have the ability to transfer a lot of items for a low, low price of 100 mana (50 mana there, 50 mana back). Hence, don't trade items until you have 4 and then the cost is down to 25

12 Replies 12,898 Views

So the $64,000 question... Brad, is FE/LH profitable enough to justify allocating resources to its continued support/development/expansion? Or has it just about completed it's life cycle, and you're ready to move on to other games?

15 Replies 57,465 Views

Hopefully these will be fixed with 1.3: When I defeated a city, the dead enemy units remained in the city, and I wasn't able to occupy it. My ally won by spell of making. Since he's my ally and I can't attack him, shouldn't I also win? I received the Steam achievement "A leader of men" at the end of the game, yet I didn't defeat all of my opponents. It seems that the AI is able to cast multiple tornado spells in rapid succession without a co

5 Replies 5,846 Views