Want want want want want . . . I'm only just a touch evil
10 Replies
14,441 Views
Serendipitous Zhao
0
Posts
0
Replies
436
Reputation
OK, I obviously can't use these forums . . . why won't this thread stay in the 'Off-Topic' section EDIT: Booyah! Working now EDIT: ..... or not
79 Replies
74,028 Views
Since this is a Sci-Fi based game, I was wondering if anyone had any suggestions regarding good Sci-Fi novels to read. I've managed to get addicted to Peter F. Hamilton's "Night's Dawn" trilogy and the Commonwealth Saga. I keep trying to figure out how to make the various races in GalCiv2 but I haven't made it that far yet. Wormholes between worlds would be awesome though <
79 Replies
74,028 Views
Terror Stars . . . would that be like . . Death Stars? :O I want a fleet of Death Stars
10 Replies
14,441 Views
Like certain Middle Eastern countries a while back . . .
8 Replies
5,918 Views
Maybe you don't actually kill all of the people on the planet ..... they just don't appear on the census list until they're happier with you ..... which would explain why 100,000,000 people can turn into one billion people in a matter of weeks. Just a thought
12 Replies
8,890 Views
The only bad thing I have to say about eToyChest is that they gave 94/100 for KOTOR II. While KOTOR was definitely in the realms of 90-100%, KOTOR II doesn't deserve a rating above 80. Why? Because they didn't finish the damn thing..... (HK-47 was awesome though . . if only they'd added the rest of his plotline and dialogue) My respect for the reviewers on that site just went down a notch....
33 Replies
24,135 Views
Reply to
Does designing faster freighters bring any advantages?
in Galactic Civilizations II
GalCiv2 Forums
GalCiv2 Forums
Sorry to hijack this thread, but with the economy starbases, do you only get the increased trade income whilst the trade ship is passing through the sphere of influence - and hence, should we be building economy starbases at the far end of the trade routes where they are supposed to make us more money? Thanks
27 Replies
21,061 Views
I don't seem to have dishes
15 Replies
9,698 Views
But if you haven't built your own yet, and you take over the *%*@*% Drengin's Class 4 planet with an economic capital and two factories . . . you are very sad
3 Replies
5,548 Views
I was ranked 326 or so . . . which is kinda odd since I suck
8 Replies
10,966 Views
My favourite event is getting a 'Lucky Ranger', which seems to happen all to often. Two dreadnoughts vs. Arcean escorts = two dreadnoughts.
11 Replies
10,012 Views
I noticed the bugged research centres last night . . .
13 Replies
14,884 Views
You don't have to pay maintainance on starbases . . so, maybe the tax they pay goes towards that? Or am I completely wrong about that :S . . .
19 Replies
13,906 Views
I found the best way to get the influence victory was to . . . remove . . . the planets from other civs which were still creating a barrier against the onslaught of dark blue I think I had an influence mining starbase but I can't remember the game.
8 Replies
10,520 Views
I've been having a lot of fun with the long ships as well... will post some pics later if my computer ever recovers from Alt-Tab
33 Replies
33,169 Views
I noticed the same thing, playing on normal (large galaxy) with common numbers of planets but uncommon habitable ones (?more realistic? anyway ). Found the Torians at the end of the game, stuck on their two original planets. I think the Altarians took the only other close planet to them. It was kind of amusing, descending on their pitiful little fleet with a squad of battleships <img src="http://i
22 Replies
18,458 Views
I've played two games, on on easy and one on normal - I won the easy game, lost the normal game but my rank was in the four hundreds last time I checked. Maybe I missed a digit . . .
3 Replies
4,384 Views
I'd really like to have the collectors edition. On some of the really great ship designs there are some awesome looking engines, but I can't find them anyway in my list. So I'll have to settle for my current designs But the game is great . . . . has made me late for work on numerous occasions now . . .
2 Replies
5,992 Views
I like the fact that I will be able to keep playing this game far into the future, without having to worry where I left the damned CD. . . I've had a lot of games which I can't play any more because their CDs have gone wandering in the number of moves I've had. If we were all communist there'd be no need to worry about copy protection. Maybe we should do that
28 Replies
32,139 Views
I just like how when you settle a gas giant, the "Class #" refers to it's moon, and then you get to build on it's moon. Could never settle the moons in MOO3 Don't really mind which way the moon goes, but I suppose it would be nice to have it going the right way.
31 Replies
15,407 Views
So can my flagship just go and find anomalies that I haven't actually visualised yet?
5 Replies
9,547 Views
I agree that the design options need to be streamlined a bit more. When I'm creating ship jewelery, there is a list of about 50-60 (or more) different objects I can put on, and it can be a bit tiresome trying to look through for them all. Maybe break it up into 'engines' (for those pieces of jewelery that look like engines), 'wings', 'antenna', 'lights', etc. It would make finding the specific piece you're after much easier. It would also be useful when there are hundreds of player created o
22 Replies
13,746 Views
I've just learnt the hard way why it's bad for the empire which you have over 75% of your trade routes decides to declare war on you . .. my poor poor money
16 Replies
23,014 Views
I'm just remembering how MOO3 had 'turns' and 'galactic cycles' (or something like) which were different periods of time! I think a turn was equal to 1.5 GC . . . I didn't know why they bothered. I don't mind the weekly thing . . although my population must breed like rabbits
81 Replies
38,307 Views