Jharii

Jharii

Joined Member # 2422701
1 Posts 103 Replies 9,840 Reputation

[quote who="thisisretarded" reply="252" id="2762093"]so did anyone else think that "labor day notes" meant we would have a new patch by labor day? [/quote] No. Otherwise it would have been "Labor Day Patch Notes."

265 Replies 686,314 Views

[quote who="cephalo" reply="83" id="2755860"]I recommend not working super hard on the AI right now beyond putting a few band-aids on the really bad stuff. Activating multiplayer might sound like a super bad idea right now, but multiplayer is the thing that will expose the game rules that will need to change. If you finalize the AI now, when multiplayer comes around it will be clear that major changes will need to be made, and you'll either be forced to make separate rule

265 Replies 686,314 Views

Is there a way to "fine tune" the X,Y,Z Offests so they increment at smaller intervals? Currently, the slider (and wheel) moves them in significant "jumps" along the coordinates that makes it difficult to align the pieces with precision. Also, is there any grouping functionality?

2 Replies 3,499 Views

[quote who="surlybob" reply="228" id="2755695"] I'm sorry, was there something that I said being referred to here, or is everyone now supposed to associate me with some random guy who PMed you a death threat? I'm not your enemy and I don't wish you harm, Mr. Frogboy. Please believe me! [/quote] You stated that you appreciated his frankness. Frogboy simply pointed out that frankness is not necessarily an actual quality, and it can be equally d

281 Replies 1,168,764 Views

[quote who="KingHobbit" reply="199" id="2754977"] Quoting Jharii, reply 192 Not really. Those "fanboys" as you call them have been defending Stardock. Most knew there were flaws and holes in the game. They are just getting rewarded by Stardock's persistence and dedication, which is what made them "fanboys" to begin with. They were just as right in defending Stardock as the detractors and antagonists by stating that Stardock would

281 Replies 1,168,764 Views

[quote]This is, frankly, one of the most impressive displays of personal responsibility I've seen in some time; a complete turnaround from your attitude a week ago. I'm sure you're aware this 180 kneecaps the fanboys who have been defending every version of the game since August 24th. That couldn't have been easy.[/quote] Not really. Those "fanboys" as you call them have been defending Stardock. Most knew there were flaws and holes in the game. They are ju

281 Replies 1,168,764 Views

Thanks for the continuous communication, effort, and patches, Stardock. It is all appreciated. [quote who="-Sorgan-" reply="118" id="2754520"]If they were truly working hard this would have never happened and they would have listened to and read the beta notes........ [/quote] But you would still be a douchebag, so there really is not any real difference as far as we're concerned.

186 Replies 347,385 Views

Modding Elemental was not some late addition to the game. It was a design-time decision. The game was meant to be moddable, from the ground up. No matter how "deep" Stardock makes the game, the community will successfully make it deeper. Once people start learning the ins and outs and all of the nuances, you will start seeing some amazing things in the modding community. Things that Stardock could not even imagine. So while I understand your sentiment, I

16 Replies 7,474 Views

[quote who="Morberis" reply="73" id="2749391"]It's clear you people have no reading comprehension. Angie/Unnammomer reviews laughably horrible books, it's part of what she does. She doesn't spit when she says his name and she's entirely reasonable.[/quote] Translation: in case you aren't prepared, I am going to flame everyone. "Everyone?" Yes, everyone. [quote]As for the size of the thread, I'm sorry but 4 pages is small potatoes. A thread that really gets going wi

124 Replies 407,941 Views

[quote who="Deleuzian" reply="308" id="2752237"] You've descended into self-parody here, perhaps without realising it. I suggest googling "Ford Pinto Memo" then... well. I'd suggest going outside for a walk for a bit. The precise is simple: the cost analysis of releasing a faulty product & some recall is offset by sales. Aka, they do it with full knowledge that they're releasing a faulty product, but the costs (even with lawsuits) are minimal compared to sales revenue. &nb

333 Replies 1,068,041 Views

[quote who="Wintersong" reply="330" id="2752232"] Negatives count double? [/quote] Damn, how could I have missed that Wintersong? Thanks for the clarification? :)

333 Replies 1,254,294 Views

[quote]I notice you manifestly failed to address / discuss / disagree with anything of content within my posts[/quote] Actually, I covered that quite well with my initial response to you, which you failed to reference: [quote]The only "head in the sand" mentality predominantly exhibited on these forums is by those that think everyone has their head in the sand. Everyone knows that there is some work to be done, including the majority of the fans of Elemental, and

333 Replies 1,068,041 Views

[quote who="shadowtongue" reply="326" id="2751929"] Not that many though, if the poll question is to be taken seriously. Barely more than half the respondents appear satisfied with the game, that's a bad sign. But like the other guy said, I also still have my $50, and none of the aggravation associated with playing what is clearly an unfinished game (from my pov). If you like the game then good on you, my guess is you are much clo

333 Replies 1,254,294 Views

[quote who="Deleuzian" reply="304" id="2752184"] Perspective: If I buy a car, and it has four square wheels because the ace-hot designer just doesn't understand physics, and the factory workers just put the wheels on anyway because they had a quota to meet, then I get to post at the obvious stupidity / lack of self-checking going on. And Yes, the % issue is just that damn obvious / stupid to anyone who actually makes games. [/quote] Persepective You did not buy

333 Replies 1,068,041 Views

[quote who="Deleuzian" reply="301" id="2752115"] which sums up the "head in the sand" mentality going on [/quote] The only "head in the sand" mentality predominantly exhibited on these forums is by those that think everyone has their head in the sand. Everyone knows that there is some work to be done, including the majority of the fans of Elemental, and especially Stardock. [quote]Someone around here needs to start calling this as self-delusion, and fast. Emplo

333 Replies 1,068,041 Views

[quote]Some of the bad mechanics in this game lie more in the STRUCTURE of the research tree rather than the functionality. People are arguing against a misnomer ... TECHS or technology. Researching Technology implies new invention and mechanical discoveries. The Devs really messed up here because part of the research tree IS about inventing or rediscovering technology, BUT some of the 'techs' have nothing to do with technology and more to do with Lore and Information.[/quote] "Techno

63 Replies 203,795 Views

This is a strategy game, not a simulation. If you want realism and things that make sense, then walk outside your front door, although it is debatable that you'll find it there. If you can't bridge the gap using your imagination, then I apologize for the short-sightedness. Heroes (for recruiting) do not have to "magically appear out of thin air." They are wandering the lands. Your researchers can make new contacts. These heroes could make themselves known

63 Replies 203,795 Views

[quote]Me likes. There will be dragonboobs too. [/quote] Take it to the Wizards forums, please. :) I'll be keeping an eye on this. Very nice intro, Winterspring. To yourself and Raven, I do DM 4E if you ever need to bend another ear. Hmmmm. Makes me wonder if skill challenges could be incorporated somehow.

50 Replies 48,144 Views

[quote]Hey, I resemble that remark! In all seriousness, I really did want this game to "be the one". The review is spot on, sorry.[/quote] It's just an opinion. Yours, theirs. Others have their own. Many disagree with you.

333 Replies 1,254,294 Views