[quote]The community has been informed well in advance of these things and yet you keep crying. Therefore you really have no ground for crying about being ripped off, no matter what you think you know about the issue.[/quote] Maybe it's exactly this kind of patronizing tone that puts me off reading what the "well informed community" for which you appear to be the elected spea
@ spylord The only clear trend that I see here is that a small company is experimenting with a buisness model which is supposed to create revenue during development and not AFTER development. Sure, that can have also it's merrits (such as feedback from the customers to be taken into account), but at the end of the day
Look, I like SoaSE and spend some nice hours playing it and - let's put things in proportion - since a tenner is really not worth getting worked up about, I have no real harsh feelings about this entrenchment beta-gig. Let Ironclad get this fixed fast and let's forget this. Having said this, I'm still quite amazed to what length fanboys go to find excuses for bad buisness policy. I normally play this kind of computer game nonsense off and on to unwind from my real jo
Alright, let me put it this way: I got quite some fun out of SoaSE and had so far not a complaint about Ironclad/Stardock. Although curious about the expansion, I was aware of some balancing problems in the beta version (in particular issues with mines), which were supposed to be fixed in the final version. Anyway, I bought entrenchment on Jan 1st, the nominal release date. Before I did so, a casual glance confirmed that this WAS still the release dat
Stardock Forums