Paladin77

Reply to Global Warming Conspiracy and Fraud Confirmed? Possibly. in Politics JoeUser Forums

[quote]Congrats on the publishing![/quote] Thanks, You don't have to read it just buy fifty copies. Each book has a different ending. lol [e digicons]}:)[/e] [quote]No Palladin global warming is true (remember the debate is over... Gore said so), just think how much COLDER it would be if we DIDN'T have global warming?????[/quote] Wow, when you put it like that it makes sense! its going to snow here in the next few hours according to the news, we have avoided a bl

Reply to Global Warming Conspiracy and Fraud Confirmed? Possibly. in Politics JoeUser Forums

[quote]Yea, my mom called from Vero Beach and was complaining about 29 last night. That is going to be the high for us over the weekend.[/quote] Look if I wanted cold I would have stayed in New York! I don't even keep my freezer that cold. Doc, on a personal note, if you don't mind I want you to buy my book and tell me what you think.

Reply to Global Warming Conspiracy and Fraud Confirmed? Possibly. in Politics JoeUser Forums

[quote]No, you cannot BBQ bears now! They are still endangered! [/quote] Why? I live in Orlando and it is so cold we are ready to give that global warming a try.

Reply to Global Warming Conspiracy and Fraud Confirmed? Possibly. in Politics JoeUser Forums

[quote]Global warming has occurred since the 'mini ice age.' Not for the past decade, but it has. So we (mostly) agree on that.[/quote] D, I have to disagree with you hear. The earth has been warming since the last BIG ice age. We are still one hundred degrees below what the earth was before the last big ice age. That was two million years ago. We warm and cool in cycles that get warmer each cycle. Since man has not been the dominant species until ten thousand years ago. I seriously d

Reply to Napolitano should be fired in Politics JoeUser Forums

[quote]With supporters like this, who needs enemies? [/quote] Hey, I stand behind my boss like a wall of feathers in a huricane!

Reply to Napolitano should be fired in Politics JoeUser Forums

[quote]To clarify, the failure was not in discovering the explosives, the failure was in allowing him to come to this country in the first place. Clearly they had ample justification for revoking his VISA and putting him on a no fly list. They failed. If they had done that, then we would not need anyone to screen him for explosives.[/quote] You are correct, the State Department did not revok the visa. The CIA did not pass on the danger of this man when they spoke to his father. Anyone

Reply to Rush recovering, first 9 comments on CNN in Politics JoeUser Forums

[quote]I don't listen to Rush, I have no party affiliation, and I don't associate myself with any particular group. However the very little I have seen or heard Rush, I saw a man that was deeply suffering. I feel compassion for his suffering and sickness, and hope he will awaken to the reality of life before he destroys himself from the inside out.[/quote] And this says it all. You don't listen to the man but you are willinhg to pin all sorts of incorrect assumptions on him to justify

Reply to Global Warming Conspiracy and Fraud Confirmed? Possibly. in Politics JoeUser Forums

[quote]Halliburton, Lockheed Martin, Raytheon are some of the biggest recipients of government handouts and they are most assuredly not liberal.[/quote] want a bet on that? I worked for lockheed Martan and i hnever met a larger bunch of liberals in my life. the execs are for green peace, pro abourtin ant the like on their bumper stickers. the company bought a butt load of hybrid cars. I don't see much in the way of hard core conservatism there. And just for the record they don't get h

Reply to Rush recovering, first 9 comments on CNN in Politics JoeUser Forums

Liberals like Nitro, Doc. and Rush give conservatives a bad name. to far left loonies.

Reply to Where is the utopia we were promised, and hoped for? in Politics JoeUser Forums

[quote]Second too much money involved (and this leads to too many "owed favors"). Limit the total amount of campaign funds to a set level (not talking about individual donations), anything over must be returned. All funds go through a non-partisan organization for transparency and accounting. A by product of this would be that campaigns would need to stay on message to conserve funds.[/quote] Set limits should be 100k per state and the money can only be spent in that state. With that

Reply to Napolitano should be fired in Politics JoeUser Forums

[quote]Janet was appointed to the position solely because of her history of favoring (some will say just 'actively ignoring') illegal immigration in a border state. She has always been a clever (some will say 'slippery') politician but had no qualifications for the job. Doesn't appear she's learned much on the job, either.[/quote] Yeah, most people in homland are demoralized by the appointment, It has not taken long for the cracks to start showitg up. [quote]I would say

Reply to Napolitano should be fired in Politics JoeUser Forums

[quote]Sorry Paladin you lost me right there. I agree that Incompitano needs to step down though. Almost a decade after 911 this terrorist raised every red flag imaginable, one way ticket, paid in cash, no baggage, pacing nervously, Islamic, denied Visa in UK, was on watchlists, father desperately trying to warn that he was radical... about the only thing this kid didnt do was wear a T-shirt that read "I luv Jihad." This is a catastrophic collapse and if Incompitano actually believed for at l

Reply to Napolitano should be fired in Politics JoeUser Forums

I doubt anyone will disagree with me on this but I had to vent. Sorry for preaching.

Napolitano should be fired in Politics JoeUser Forums

Not because she said that the system worked, she was correct on that point. She should be fired because she is incompetent. She has no clue how to run a Department and is too busy being PC that she fails to see the problems coming down the road. <span style="font-family: Book

Reply to Where is the utopia we were promised, and hoped for? in Politics JoeUser Forums

You are all correct we did not have a choice but that is because we allowed that to happen when we let the democrats vote in our primary elections. They chose our guy.

Reply to 'Stupid' Sarah - Right All Along in Politics JoeUser Forums

[quote]But what does irk me is for the liberals here to pretend that the biased view of foreigners is an affirmation of their opinions, when in actual fact itis just a reflection of their opinions. And of course it irks me when foreigners who have not done more than cursory research into the US try to tell americans, with some sort of self important authority, what is wrong with their country.[/quote] I got that alot in Syria, and Jordan.

Reply to Where is the utopia we were promised, and hoped for? in Politics JoeUser Forums

Admit it you were conned

Where is the utopia we were promised, and hoped for? in Politics JoeUser Forums

We elected an empty suit. The conservatives knew it, the optimistic liberals hoped it would be filled by someone, anyone behind the scenes. Unfortunately, there is no puppet master behind the screen. We are getting exactly what we voted for. A guy that looks good on camera, a man that wanted to be president and got his wish. The problem with the last three democrat presidents

Reply to 'Stupid' Sarah - Right All Along in Politics JoeUser Forums

[quote]She has a long way to go because she has to overcome that bigotry in the US. She can (after all Obama was elected). But one thing you have shown me is that no conservative will ever be favored abroad. The foreign opinion is based on the liberal media agenda, and is a direct reflection of it. Ignorant and a lie, but then foreigners have no incentive (and indeed no reason) to learn the real truth about Americans.[/quote] Here is what Gov. Palin said if that means anything to anyo

Reply to Global Warming Conspiracy and Fraud Confirmed? Possibly. in Politics JoeUser Forums

[quote]So first from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Spencer_(scientist). The wiki article lists his credentials and experience in the field all of which seems to directly qualify him as a legitimate expert within the field of global warming. However there are a couple of “red flags” brought out in his wiki article. For one he’s as much known as a proponent of intelligent design as he is as an AGW denier. I suppose how you take this will depend on your view

Reply to Global Warming Conspiracy and Fraud Confirmed? Possibly. in Politics JoeUser Forums

[quote]Blah, blah, blah. Who cares. It's not even worth my time looking him up. Let me grant him the benefit of the doubt and say OK he's legitimate. So what. I've already stipulated that credible and credentialed scientists that disagree do exist however there exists "no scientific body of national or international standing [that] has maintained a dissenting opinion."[/quote] Nice try in moving the goal post. Your above reply has noting to do with your statement that I rebutted

Reply to Global Warming Conspiracy and Fraud Confirmed? Possibly. in Politics JoeUser Forums

I stand corrected, the last two years of the Reagan administration, the first two years of the Bush administration, the last too years of the Clinton administration and the first two years of the Bush administration. so that is 8 out of 28.

Reply to Global Warming Conspiracy and Fraud Confirmed? Possibly. in Politics JoeUser Forums

[quote]What I and most other reasonable people believe is that there is no doubt that global warming is occurring and that man's activity is in at least some part responsible for it. In other words AGW is a real and present danger.[/quote] Okay, I have gone through this many times with this silly argument. I will try one more time. AGW as

Reply to What do US soldiers think of waterboarding terrorists? in Politics JoeUser Forums

[quote] essentially the rest of the world it seems lol except Europe and the US and Canada.[/quote] Known fact: the UK, France, Spain, and in two known cases even Germany does it. The Germans use sound waves that can explode a kidney if done incorrectly or correctly depending on who is using it. The French just beat the hell out of you, the UK uses chemicals, drugs that make you vomit, cause your blood pressure to rise to dangerous levels. All except for France leave no phisical

Reply to What do US soldiers think of waterboarding terrorists? in Politics JoeUser Forums

[quote]It generally makes me shudder how willing many people are to do violence unto others. There is no part of human culture where mankind has been so inventive as in coming up with methods to torture and/or execute others. [/quote] I think you miss the point. Waterboarding is not violent, or painful. it is startiling, shocking but not painful or dangerous, which is why it is used on our troops. [quote]It is a mark of civility and progress for me to surpass that barbar