I still don't see how saying somebody deliberately spread disinformation and deception is better than saying somebody lied. I think the average person would see those two things as being exactly the same. However, deliberate disinformation is the definition of some politics and also of the media because they know "Joe-si
From an article on CNN.com : "Kay told the senators that the intelligence he had seen before the war indicated Saddam had banned weapons and that France and Germany -- countries that had opposed the war -- had stated that the Iraqi dictator possessed such weapons."
There is a child out there who is undoubtedly the stupidest person ever to exist . He received a Power Mac G5 for Christmas, but decided that it would be prudent to rip out the G5 parts and replace them with a Dell. Considering that the cheapest G5 is $1,800, and that Dells can be bought for around $500, I think what he did is absolutely disgusting. Even if you hate Apple, I'm sure you'll agree that what he did was utterly retarded . Hopefully, his parents will beat him when t
Is Al Franken on the left, or do they see him as a fool that ruins their name? Also, isn't accusing somebody of deliberately spreading disinformation and deception the same thing as calling them a liar, or are liberals following Clinton's trend when he asked what the definition of "is" was. Also, one should remember that ninety percent is not one hundred percent. By the way, if the left acknowledges that Saddam Hussein was a devastating terrori
I did a quick search for France and Germany's interests in Iraq, and what I found opened my eyes to how little these so-called "freedom fighters for Iraqi people" care about the Iraqi people! When Saddam's in power, they act as though they're against the U.S. invasion for the welfare of Iraqis, despite the fact that everybody knows of their own interests in Iraq , and then when the U.N
Why is the corporation so sacrosanct? Is it as impersonal as the government? Does not the corporation bleed, does it not weep, does it not have the milk of human kindness? Corporations aren't charity organizations, and I personally have no problem with that. Can you imagine how the computing world would
I think the left takes its job too seriously, protecting pets (or in this case, just animals) at the cost of millions of lives. If they really wanted to protect people, they wouldn't take that which is protecting them from deadly diseases because I'm sure that if we were to ask an African if he or she would rather die from Malaria or have birds have thinner eggs, he or she would choose the latter.
Let's not forget to be very whiney and needy. Surely that'd scare anybody away!
New York city I believe is in the northeast and there are plenty of blacks there doing menial tasks to keep the white privilege alive. I don't live in New York, but I don't think it would be too crazy for me to assume that many white people are stuck performing those menial tasks as well.
I don't see how going into a war that was already happening justifies all the lies that brought us into the war the first place. US soldiers and innocent civilians still die for a lie, even if other nations start the war.
Maybe it's just me, but Kerry sounds like he can be easily manipulated when he claims he was tricked into voting in favor of the Iraqi war. And to think that Democrats criticized Bush for being a puppet without a clue. Not only that, but the phony medal act also shows that he's insincere. Surely the Democrats have better people in their arsenal.
That's why i enjoy polygamy. It's like eating at a buffet!
I just want to make it clear that it was the U.N that told Iraq to disarm all these years. I t was not only the U.S.
I guess it's clear as to why liberals are against capital punishment. They wouldn't have any leaders left!
How sweet of the left to save a few birds at the cost of millions of lives.
I'm sure if Evo Morales would have been elected president, there would have been some kind of coup with American influences in the years following; a bit like Hugo Chavez, the president of Venezuela, experienced in 2002 (and PLEASE, don't tell me the americans had nothing to do there). Hypothetical situ
I know that land was taken away to make Israel, but the rest is news to me. Of course, I guess people would like to pretend that the Arabians have offered the Israelites nothing but love. Whether it's anti-Semitism or just plain hatred for anything affiliated with the US, we will never know. Israel has blood on their hands, but I think everybody knows that there is blood on the hands of the Arabs as well. To deny this is silly and undermines all other
Cutting off foreign aid and closing its markets to a country is nothing to taking that country over. I don't see why people would have a problem with that, unless they expect the US to give them support without any expectations. The US isn't a charity.
Maybe it's me, but I think that the Arabs who have terrorized Israel are as guilty as Israel in spreading the terror in the Middle East. We have supported Israel but have we ever given them license to do what they desire in the Middle East? It also seems that people are criticizing the present US government for things in the past, such as supporting anti-Communist governments. My only advice to that is to get with the times, or let's judge all pres
We are discussing the past though, which is why we are discussing past events of the US.
Not once did I say that the US has not attacked and killed civilians, but if we're going to use the past to criticize the present US, then I can gladly say that anything the US has done does not compare to the evils of Europe. Therefore, rather than criticize the US, I think we should focus on ridding the world of the evil that is Europe.
I asked when has the US deliberately attacked innocent civilizans, which was answered with "when hasn't it?" I'm sure that many will agree with me when I say that it sounds as though that implies that hte US has deliberately attacked innocent civilians since its birth and continues to do so. As for Canada not being attaccked by terrorists, I'm sure it's the same reason as to why Mexico and some tiny insignificant nation in Africa hasn't been attack
How far into the past are we going because I'm not sure about the recent terrors of other world powers, although I do know that Vietnam was France's fault to begin with. To suggest that the US is constantly seeking to kill innocent civilians is ludicrous at best, unless other countries have simply condoned the actions of the US for decades, actions which have not made it into the news. Of course, I guess that to somebody who hates the US, any actio
WinCustomize Forums
Actually this thread was, well, meant to be taken lightly. It was sarcastic, not a "bash thread"... anyone with a sense of humor would find this funny, and then let it go. But people took it seriously, and it got out of hand. I don't think it's whether or not somebody has a sense of humor or not, but I think it's the fact that there are actually
WinCustomize Forums
I never knew that two people of the same family couldn't hold powerful offices at the same time. I hope somebody lynches them Kennedys for they are truly minions of Satan!
JoeUser Forums