The US has deliberately targeted innocent civilians? When was this? As for supporting dictators, when was the last time they did that, and if it happened during the Cold War, then I feel it is justified, as the dictators were seen as necessary evils to contain the spread of communism. Of course, many people might have preferred that the Soviet Union be the ultimate world power. I know that America has intervened against the wish of others, but
messybuu
Tech Cat is right on the money, unless Linux supporters are saying that vinyl is far superior to leather, or that plastic bumpers are far superior to metal ones. Each kind of entity mentioned is notorious for taking inferior alternatives to save money. Not that it doesn't make Linux less mainstream, but it's only mainstream for its price tag, not for its features.
I think what Brad's pointing out is that those who are criticizing America as if it is the only country guilty of such actions are acting like hypocrites. Sure, America does worse than any other country in the world, but it also does better. It might be better if we were a country that did nothing for the world like Switzerland, but maybe we're a double-edged sword that countries take for granted.
What country out there treats other countries as well as it treats its citizens? And is the US deliberately murdering innocent people as the terrorists did or are people only saying that because they think of terrorists as innocent people?
That's totally turned me off from pre-ordering from companies that have delays.
I've always wondered from where that tab in the properties dialog originated! IconPackager is great, and it's even greater now that I know that it could even change the icons of programs, which are often terrible.
Next thing we'll know they'll ask the zoos to rename the animals to something else than jaguar. Or hey, maybe they'll get the car sompany to change its name... Apple wouldn't bother demanding that zoos change the name of jaguars to something else! They'll be focusing on getting the name of panthers changed! <A HREF="https://www.
I don't feel any sympathy for the kid, although I do hope Microsoft doesn't try to sue him out of house and home. After all, he's just a kid who needs some humility.
Maybe it's me, but I think that a corporation should have the right to decide what to pay its employees as opposed to having a government decide what the corporation should pay its employees. Of course, we could always have the government step in and demand that the wages of employees be raised to a "humane" amount, which would either result in higher prices, which would place those who rose above the poverty line by the government's actions right back
Perhaps Americans vote conservatively because liberalism is in the Media too much. It's like when one eats cake everyday that don't want anymore cake on their birthday, except the cake is liberals and the birthday is election day.
Why would somebody pay $500 extra for a Mac? Honestly, I did it because I've always wanted a Mac. It's like buying a more expensive car that's nicer than one that's just as good. And let's face it, Macs are totally hot!
I love my sexy iBook, but it does annoy me that it only has one mouse button on it. You'd think that with the extra five-hundred dollars I pay for a Mac computer, that they'd add an extra button, especially when context menus are quite common.
I think it's pretty obvious on which side of the fence Frodo is when you look at those pictures all over the Internet.
You admit that Saddam needed to be removed, and the US did something to remove him. I highly doubt this means that the US will start going after presidents who have not been threats for over a decade. Personally, I think Saddam's past as well as his continued sandbagging was evidence enough for his removal.
Yup. I think that's why it looks as though we have a lower quality of life, because we want more, but I don't think that's a bad thing. I'm a material girl and I'm living in a material world and I love it!
It wouldn't bother me at all if the government were to force businesses to pay me handsomely for handing out flyers in front of the store, or working fast food, and even if that resulted in the layoff of millions, the government could always create new jobs for the unemployed.
I like the Dock. I'm making an assumption here, but it seems that those who prefer it are those new to Macs while those who've used them don't like them as much. Still, I do agree with some of those issues, especially the last one.
The segregation that Linux users advocate does work against them. Although they might enjoy it, I'm sure that many will agree with me when I say that one should be able to reliably copy and paste from one application to another. It's simply better when things work well together even if it means a little bloat, which Linux has as well except without the benefit.
I'm happy that the XBOX Next isn't going to be released too soon. I don't know about others, but I feel that the current offering by MSN (Microsoft, Sony, and Nintendo) are adequate for a few more years.
Are entitled to equal footing in the pursuit of their goals. I wonder how this would be applied in the real world. How would we ensure that children from families that live in the ghetto have the same footing as one from one of those sleazy clothing designers? <TABLE cellpadding=8 width="95%" a
Since when did the freedom of speech forbid people from criticizing others? I also don't know about the ad that was pulled, but I do know that most television stations are not government entities and are not obligated to allow everything on their broadcasts. I do agree though that perhaps the USA should not have aided Europe after the war. As for being reluctant to fight in a war that was primarily European, I seem to remember that we felt it b
Maybe it's not just a European POV, but it's clearly a POV of the left. After all, who else would criticize a freedom simply because that freedom benefits corporations as well as individuals? Also, how could we take it seriously when if we strike first, we're criticized for being bullies, but if we strike after, we're criticized for not helping in time. The world wants America's resources, but at the same time, they want nothing to do with America, in
I'm sure you've all heard somebody on the Left say "You can never stop terrorism, so don't even try," or "You can never stop piracy, so don't even try," or "You can never stop abortions, so keep it legalized," (not saying abortion is good or bad, but this is a stupid reason to defend keeping abortions legal) or "You can never stop drug use, so don't even try." Is it just me, or is this the attitude of quitters? They might be right that these things won't ever cease to exist, but does that mean t
From what I heard, "Frighteners" (the one with M.J. Fox right?) was a flop because people really didn't know what kind of movie it was, which means it's not so much the movie that sucked as was the ads for it.
In the case of GIMP and OpenOffice, it costs time in the fact that things can be done quicker in their commercial counterparts. True, nobody needs all the features of Office 2003, but small things such as being able to see the word count without going to the menu makes it worth the cost. As for GIMP, I personally feel that it's just one of the ugliest programs in the entire world.