Hi black, I wasn't saying that you wouldn't be welcome to enter, I have nothing to do with the tourney. I just know that this game (probably like dota) is not noob friendly especially when playing with/against experienced players. So a separate section would make it much more inviting in a tourney format and likely better all round for the community.
Actually that comment raises a good point. A separate part of the tourney for people with < say 200 games (smurfs excluded) would be of benefit to raise interest in the game. I know numbers are limited and this idea may have logistical problems but it seems pointless to have new ppl entering a tourney vs experienced players and seeing their citadel flattened in 20 minutes. I don't think that would endear new ppl to the game. Even if say 8 (2 player) teams comprising new players could be fo
[quote]There are so many awesome mods that require little to no thinking too! [/quote] Yeah the mods are great - the replay value of sc2 is very high due to the mods alone. Even if you don't like the (required) high apm of vanilla sc2 its still worth a look. Even better (for me) they recently let AU ppl start playing on NA bnet servers...
nah I don't take offense lol...I just thought the wording was funny. It was just a suggestion as then the familiarity stays with the team. As you say is very important and seems as though there is an emphasis for it to be over.
Suggestion.. (not sure if this has been raised already) I know this was a 3v3 tourney but if you are missing players and both teams agree can't you just play a 2v2 to finish these games up? Then no team requires a "shit" pug... I will now duck for cover whilst the abuse flies my way.
hey man just logged on - by my reckoning that's in about 15 minutes. PM me in dg.
[quote]cause them to quit to save their ear drums, lol.[/quote] yeah fair call pat. It's a shit thing to do to anyone, and to be on the receiving end of for that matter. Not going to make any excuses cos there really are none. Sorry.
[quote]After all, this is where the word 'troll' was born[/quote] bs
cheers. definitely worth the 500 imo...
Is the below correct then? (1) The upgrade effects both DG's and creeps. (2) And, the splash increase effects arrow towers and the direct damage increases effect the beam towers? (3) A query: Is this possibly where the misconception arose as the first beam tower that the creeps get to has no arrow tower and therefore you would not see any increased splash damage? thanks for the effort on this guys it would be great to sort it out..
[quote]I can't even beat the first stage without dying 100 times.[/quote] are you being sarcastic? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RULv6HbgEjY&feature=player_embedded
Man what a bunch of naysayers.. What's the harm in trying?? If you've quit the game then stop shouting it down from a distance. If you have nothing left to contribute then piss off. Why does someone's enthusiasm necessitate a negative response? Just give it a go pacov - you've got nothing to lose except your time which you seem to be very generous with. It would be great for existing players even if it doesn't cause an increase in new sales. Defin
ice tb with such a favor would be pretty difficult to deal with..
[quote]Here's a quick recap: * 8 min or so – I kill both cambokill/your_maker while they fight for 275 gold against the AI. * No sigil on cambo though he has 4k gold * At lev 8 your_maker has 2 levels of morale, but no spirits. * At lv 13 cambokill has 2 levels of bestial wrath * At lv 15, he opts for another level of bestial wrath instead of acclimation * 23 min in – cambo is killed running around without a sigil and focusing his attacks
[quote]You are better off with a gun and thats the bottom line.[/quote] Charlton Heston FTW!
the internet has a lot to answer for....
I haven't watched this replay and before I do is the point of this thread that someone had a bad game?
[quote]Question, do you expect world changing arguments on a forum for a video game? An argument about said video game seems quite appropriate to me. [/quote] Agreed, this is precisely the purpose of a dg forum. Beats the hell out of "you host dc'd!!" I will make 1 comment re min oak. I remember a specific success against a min oak was as erebus (myself) with ub and reg on my team. Note we didn't choose this as a counter and didn't know the strat
Am i missing something? How is mist erebus effective against oak min on cruc?? Even if you did sit in front of your citadel misting to kill the spirits how are you supposed to level and stop them taking the rest of the map??
lol i saw the host dc was just kidding...
http://pantheon.demigodthegame.com/game/1554165/player/90717/ lol it says you lost.. [e digicons]8(|[/e]
pacov can we close this thread. I see no point in giving this guy the limelight he so clearly wants. It is only going to deteriorate further...
Just curious but how do you know they are all the same people? Is that from IP traces or something?
Like i said. I did concede. I waited for him to feed a couple more pointless deaths then I left as I figured, even after repeated requests, he wasn't going to concede.
Didn't rq. I conceded and asked for him to. He refused to even though game was over. Seemed pointless to stick around.
Stardock Forums
Demigod Forums