Just curious. Sure you are.
Tiddler
I'd like to be able to search posts and replies by another user with various sorts and filters (by date, by article). It'd be interesting to know what percentage of posts a user makes that are simply abusive towards others. In other words is it just me or is this guy just an across the board knuckle head? It'd also be nice to able to save a link to such a search (with params) so you could suggest the knuckle head go take a good long look at
I personally would like a feature that can reach out and bitch slap a troll when they are being over the top obnoxious. Well then in that case I'd like a bitch slap prevention shield.
Keep up the good work, you came in new (to me anyways) and your first order of the day was to make enemies. No my first order of the day was to post a comment on this article about what I thought and think is a totally irrational and disconnected "argument". So irrational in fact I think its very funn
No, dont need any allies, but knowing your lack of reading comprehension, I can see where you would fear that. Sorry, maybe next time I will write it in baby talk - more on your level so you understand. Given how many fights you pick Dr Guy, you really ought to learn how to throw a punch. Is this an ex
I guess it all depends on what makes who laugh. But then again, you don't really know if I'm laughing over here or not, with you or at you. Oh please, clearly you took it seriously. Besides its not so much a matter of not knowing as it is not caring. <TABLE cellpadding=8 width="95%" align=c
if this is the case, what did we achieve by voting NOTA? I think it was intended as a mildly sarcastic response to my two sides of the same coin moan. Somehow LW doesn't strike me as the type to throw away her vote.
Careful - he thinks he is a genius. Only relative to you Dr Guy..... much like the way an ordinary girl finds herself an ugly friend.
Ah yes, we can always count on the idiotic liberals to come out of the woodworks and make fools of themselves. And they wonder why people vote for Republicans. Nice job braniac, you make it so easy for the rest of use to show you liberals for the fools you really are it almost makes me feel like a lazy Democrats not having to do the hard work since others are willing to do it for me. ???
Would you like to join my NOTA Party? I quite like the idea of the German MMP system.
Thank you for proving my point. Seems like Little Whip is the only one with a sense of humor.
I suppose I'll be called a racist for pointing this out (sighs, what else is new? but i call 'em like i see 'em) but most of these slow-motion employees are black, so Simon and I have come up with our own terminology to describe them. As an "apparent" liberal I feel it my duty to inform you that we don
I believe that this is one of the most compelling reasons to do away with government welfare programs. Your reasoning is a riot. Do away with government welfare programs because someone with a job put steak in your chicken quesadilla "value meal". <img src="../images/smiles/smile.gif" border=0 ALIGN="
I should say here that I was a notorious sleep walker when I was small. Notorious sleepwalking kid grows up to become an on the move trucker. To this day I still have no idea what that loud voice said to me although I have always had the nagging feeling that it was somehow important. I remember (he spoke so loud
this is true in the usa because we actually vote for everyone. Yep. Those two sides of that same coin sure are democracy in action.
Wow. Finally a liberal who's not afraid to state that they believe being on a limited income amounts to a character defect. Except thats not what I said. People cannot,
Why fingerprints? I don't get it. I don't even get why they want to take fingerprints 'in case your child goes missing.' Because its not about fingerprinting for food. Its about conditioning entire generations into accepting the process of being biometrically audited. The same people who say its harmless are the same people who think they are winning a game of chess right up to the very moment their opponent says "Check Mate". Couple these kinds
"Oh well, I wasn't using my civil liberties anyway." lmfao.
i think that the whole point of this article is who is going to pay for the child. thus who will raise the child. the parent or the state. Well then you're wrong. Paying for a childs welfare is not the same as raising a child. You only have to look at child welfare payments to recognize that. Just because their parents receive money from the taxpayer doesn't mean the taxpayer is raising their kids. even a bad parent i
parents from the beginning of the world have been responsible for the children I think the whole point of this article (aside from handing out another good, hearty liberal bashing of course) is to suggest they aren't always and that when they aren't to question whether the rest of us should be.
i would suggest most of them weren't. but the way the enemy operates who knows for sure you. Sorry I dont get your point?
No wonder no one believes him when he says things are improving. They believed him when he said there was a threat. There wasn't. They believed when he said we'd won. We hadn't and we haven't. Is it really that the left are just Bush haters or that their just not blinded like the Bush lovers.
Yep. Like the beginning, middle and.... oh wait there is no end. And yet he's already declared victory at least once?
Even those of us who still support Prs. Bush don't claim to support everything about him. I support him in the war in Iraq, but I also admit he has botched parts of it. Yep. Like the beginning, middle and.... oh wait there is no end.
hate to burst your bubble but more civilians die in war than warriors because there are more civilians. My "bubble" doesn't rest of the idea that they were danielost. The quote you've taken from me doesn't suggest any of the 19,429 were civilians but rather than not all of them were terrorists