You really aren't playing dumb are you? You really are that obtuse. I suggest a course in reading threads 101. ENough playing with children. Amuse yourself if you want. Hold your breath until you turn blue if you want. makes no difference to me. My job is done here. Unless you need a class in google 101.
Tiddler
I read somewhere once, or maybe it was on some current affairs program, that rich people are better at telling lies. Primarily because they tell so many of them. The suggestion being that white lies move you forward, strict adherence to honesty doesn't. Basic schmoozing bullshit, "you look good", " your kids are great", that kinda crap. So I dunno if the rich are greedy pigs but it seems they tell more porkers.
Typical sheep-shagging lefty. Leave GrandDad out of this. He's not been well for years.
If the statement had been made - Madam X said....... you would be correct. However the statement was made that "how is the left..." which is not a person, but a political persuasion. The proof was provided. Since you did not ask for a person, no person need be attributed, only the statement shown as being made. it was made.
This was my fav part. Not only do they deny it . Deny what? I see 5 statements in the link Dr Guy offered none of which excuses his tyranny. By all means Charles point out which of those statement excuses his tyranny. Once you're done heckling of course. <TABLE cellpadding=8 width="95%" ali
It totally cracked me up when he said there are no homosexuals in Iran.I kept waiting for the punch line..... Any country that needs to kill off its queers, is clearly more fagotty than the rest. Otherwise why would you be so threatened by them?
Amadinejad in 2008 is not? You have a strange standard. Yup o.k missed that "one" verifiable source. And you mispoke. The source is verifiable since it was written do
Let me count the ways https://www.joeuser.com/index.asp?aid=163463 None of those are attributed a verifiable source and even if they were none of those are excusing tyranny.
Yikes. Scary. 10 weeks. Too bad he wasn't a blond celebrity in the United States. Yup. I'd stuff a wig in your glovebox just in case. You never know when you might need to put on a little "hotness" to get you out of a drivi
What is the most entertaining to me is all the ways the left are excusing his tyrrany. In how many ways are the left excusing his tyranny?
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/09/24/speed_sentence/ One of your friends perhaps??
You're a funny one. You get a new 2008 Porsche, you park it in the drive and take photos of it so you can put them online and then you LEAVE IT parked in the driveway while you spend all weekend ONLINE banging on about how you hate the poor and their apologists. Get off the computer and go for a fucking drive man. At 200 mph everyone looks the same anyway. Jeez. Maybe they should cap wealth because clearly some people dont know how to e
Absolutely not. I didnt say we should forget that in the sense you understood it. I agree with all what you said. However, it does us no good now to talk about it. it is too little too late for that No what you said was: let's forget about the phony reasons that we were given as a reason for this war.Also let's forget all of the reasons that were introduced to justify this war after the original ones proved false. Let'
If we, all of us Ameicans, to honestly discuss this war we should start by asking the following question: let's forget about the phony reasons that we were given as a reason for this war.Also let's forget all of the reasons that were introduced to justify this war after the original ones proved false. Interesting so in your mind the best way for Americans to begin "honestly" discussing this war is by ignoring all the lies, de
when arguing the current war to reference ancient history—WWII, Korea and Vietnam Ancient history?? World War II started in '37 or '39 depending on which of the primary conflicts you happen to be referencing. That's 70 years maximum. What terms would you use to describe the Ming Dynasty i wonder? protect the Soviet menace in Eastern Europe Don't you mean protect "against". A typo im sure but it completel