Haeso

Haeso

Joined Member # 3060302
2 Posts 95 Replies 645 Reputation

[quote]It strikes me as strange that in a game that is so incredibly easy to mod, and provides both an auto record/playback feature and an endless list of graphs at the end of the match, that the discussion is still revolving around vague references to 'math' and 'I'll fight ye!' chestbeating. If you have:a) notepadb) a second PC and/or someone willing to test a modification out with you on ICOWould you care to explain why you are wasting your time trying to lobby the developers for a change to

118 Replies 130,828 Views

Okay so it was the devs fault for listening to the whiny babies. But without the whiny babies I gaurantee it wouldn't have been changed was the point. People need to take some responsibility for themselves and not just blame the devs alone. I respect the devs and what they've done - up to this patch. For different reasons. But that's my stance. It's still a great game, but to many of us, this patch was a step backwards except for the AI (Though the save game AI and player controlling the same te

18 Replies 10,349 Views

I'm just angry at the amount of crying about something that isn't imbalanced. I'm not angry at one person in general. The amount of misinformation flying around is crazy. Flak will beat LRMs in a cost effective scenario. And as far as my "e-peen" I don't care what someone thinks of me. But the whole lrm thing just irritates me to no end. And I haven't used IRC in like 10 years. Maybe if I get it working again I will. And I don't like the idea of handicapping myself for a challe

118 Replies 130,828 Views

I'm not embarressed or bothered at all by this thread, what people think of others on an internet forum? Pointless. I'm very different in real life, and so are most of you. But as far as here goes. I play other games with people that if I was with in real life, I would probably start a fight with them - but I respect their knowledge and skill to the point where regardless of how much we might bicker argue and disagree. We work together. Because we realize that for everyone involved including our

190 Replies 205,813 Views

For all you whiny little babies that think LRMs are overpowered and will cause more damage than their cost against flak and buildings. play me 1v1 and lets test our your solid mathcraft and theorycraft. Lets see how your on paper experience goes against my in game experience. I've got over 150 games on all my accounts to back up my side of this argument. How about you? Little pissants probably won't even accept the challenge. 12 pm est after that I can play, not sure how long I'll be up

118 Replies 130,828 Views

[quote]Illums can be good, in close range, the LRM missles spin around your ship a few times before finally getting hit, while illums can get close and the three guns (front and one on each side) will definetly hit. So bring your illums in close range to the LRMs. try something like that, make your illums fly over the LRMs and the back again, they will spend all there time turning around while your side guns take them out.Illuminators only deal 75% damage to other LRMs, they are less cost effici

12 Replies 18,055 Views

[quote]Perhaps a thread stating suggestions with a disclaimer at the top stating all non useful post will be deleted. That way we won't have to read all the rest of the garbage posts going on.There is good feedback and bad. Lately. It just seems like the forums are being attacked by 15 year olds with nothing better to do.In the end. We all want this game to be great. I think people have forgotten that and are only wanting their way. Ironclad and Stardock are game designers who are trying t

18 Replies 10,349 Views

[quote]since that competitive elite possibly represents less than 0.1%[/quote] The competitive elite that identifies problems before they become widespread and the non competitive players start to lose against other non competitive players with more or less skill just because they've figured out these broken strategies. Or are you suggesting we just sweep these imbalances under the rug and agree not to use them (If you have much experience with the internet I'm sure if you thin

118 Replies 130,828 Views

[quote]After playing Sins for a solid few days on patch 1.03, I feel finally able to judge some of the implications of the patch. The unit balance kicks big butts! Well I'm not American or even African American so that probably is the wrong phrase lol. Suffice to say, the there are no real cheese units that I can find and everything seems to have a counter (unit wise). That isn't to say some units still aren't great (or better) but everything seems to have its place. I even use the siege frigate

118 Replies 130,828 Views

[quote]Hee hee...This is funny....What it boils down to is that people are upset that the Vasari are no longer overpowered and are now losing to people playing other races ( including the TEC...which were a little wimpy)Sounds like they are trying to balance the races...I play TEC ( I always play Humans ...even in Starcraft I always played humans)I haven't played MP yet to due the fact of TEC defiencies and all those stupid LRM spams....and mostly because I don't like people as a whole...Hee hee

190 Replies 205,813 Views

[quote]Anyone who's been with us since the Galactic Civilizations days knows that we take feedback responsible. Heck, the starbases in GalCiv came from player feedback! Can anyone whose played GalCiv imagine GalCiv without the starbases now? But the people who suggested starbases didn't start out by saying "This game sucks, only adding starbases will save it."Rock on. Now starbases are not only an integral feature of the game, with the famous 24 Military Starbase Array being some kind of achiev

118 Replies 130,828 Views

[quote]@ bonerfest > Thanks for your correction. I am not visually impaired : I had focused on the official 1.03 changelog, not paying any attention to the homepage.My hypothesis, then, is that a marketing-oriented author, on the homepage, got carried away.As far as I'm concerned, the official changelog is the most correct & precise, reliable technical info ... and I do not see any « vastly improved » A.I. there. Marketing ...[/quote] I'd just like to say, that the changelog, didn't eve

29 Replies 49,565 Views

[quote]@ bonerfest > Thanks for your correction. I am not visually impaired : I had focused on the official 1.03 changelog, not paying any attention to the homepage.My hypothesis, then, is that a marketing-oriented author, on the homepage, got carried away.As far as I'm concerned, the official changelog is the most correct & precise, reliable technical info ... and I do not see any « vastly improved » A.I. there. Marketing ...[/quote] I'd just like to say, that the changelog, didn't eve

29 Replies 49,565 Views

more repeating of what's already been said, hopefully someone listens to you or innociv, they're certainly not listening to me, at least I got the ball rolling even if people hate me. Glad other people are starting to realize I wasn't just having a kneejerk. Carry on here :|

29 Replies 61,283 Views

[quote]Ahem....I would just like to point out Haeso, that before you even posted this thread very, very, very many inflamatory choice words were in fact being used by you in the ICO chat! Anyone having had to listen to you on ICO would have gotten a terrible impression of you.....just my take.the Monk[/quote] And I'd totally buy a new sim city game astatine. I like them. It just felt accurate to me, I've never seen so many trade ports compared to this patch. And monk the point

190 Replies 205,813 Views

[quote]From (Stardock CEO) Frogboy's reply #15 : Some people have explicitly said that the hard core multiplayer players are the heart of the community and must be made top priority. And that's something I can't accept. Our goal has to remain to make sure as many people as possible enjoy the game. To the tiny 0.1% « competitive elite » : Is that clear enough for you non-noob, non-moron, non-stupid guys ?![/quote] We like variety :( Why are you guys so hostile when we mention imbalance,

118 Replies 130,828 Views

[quote]Stick to your guns, Frogboy. We SP (and casual MP) gamers love what you're saying. If the "elite" think one race has an advantage, they can either mod it themselves or all play as the same "advantaged" race. Some people would complain even if you hung them with a new rope.[/quote] We like variety :( Why are you guys so hostile when we mention imbalance, are you so affected by fanboyism that you cannot see very glaring issues? I can't stress enough, we like the game, we support

118 Replies 130,828 Views

[quote]Nobody is suggesting that it should: simply that players like that look at the stats and optimise more than friendly games or single player, and they will find the problems first. That's important for multiplayer, simply because once found, they're easily communicated, and now the small flaws in the unit balance mean 80% of all games play the same way, x faction is never used, y unit is never used, etc. We agree. The problem is that it's hard for us to seperate the signal and the noi

118 Replies 130,828 Views

[quote]What would you have me say to that. You and I disagree. I don't know how many times in how many different ways we can say that we look at the posts, play through the game, and make recommendations on balancing changes based on player feedback? But at the same time, I don't agree that elite level multiplayer issues are going to take precedence over, for instance, improving the computer AI or getting AI players to replace dropped players or making it easier to join multiplayer ga

118 Replies 130,828 Views

[quote]What I am saying though is that the belief that the "competetive" MP crowd is doing the rest of the community a favor is a fallacy that has been statistically proven incorrect over countless of studies. (1)Because competitive players play differently than the rest of the community, they will discover issues that the rest of the community does not see(2), are not affected by(3), and in many cases don't even understand(4). Competitive MP players are the smallest denomination of any IP. (5)O

190 Replies 205,813 Views